Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 528953 times)

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #432 on: July 03, 2018, 10:12:15 AM »
Advertisement
Oswald

Wow, you now believe it is Oswald in the doorway.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #432 on: July 03, 2018, 10:12:15 AM »


Offline Duncan MacRae

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 455
    • JFK Assassination Photographs
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #433 on: July 03, 2018, 10:34:28 AM »
Wow, you now believe it is Oswald in the doorway.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #434 on: July 03, 2018, 10:40:26 AM »
Wow, you now believe it is Oswald in the doorway.

No good reason why this can't be LHO.
No good reason to think it can be any other TSBD employee, and every good reason to think it can't!



The elimination of Sarah Stanton and the fine probative work of Stancak et al, have moved this into the territory of Beyond Reasonable Doubt IMO. The AnybodyButOswald crew are sounding more and more desperate. They're out of alternative candidates!  :'(


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #434 on: July 03, 2018, 10:40:26 AM »


Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #435 on: July 03, 2018, 10:52:52 AM »
The elephant in the room is the preposterous idea that these conspirators would have been so incredibly inept as to let Our Boy Oswald be on the front steps at that time in full view (potentially) of cameras.

Why would that have been incredibly inept of them, James?

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #436 on: July 03, 2018, 11:07:42 AM »
Seems obvious to me.
They are plotting to set him up as a shooter on the 6th floor and it doesn't occur to them they need to control his movement to be damn sure he isn't placed elsewhere by cameras?
What am I missing?

That they may not have been plotting to set him up as a shooter on the 6th floor. Get it now?  Thumb1:

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #436 on: July 03, 2018, 11:07:42 AM »


Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #437 on: July 03, 2018, 11:47:56 AM »
Comic relief time, part two!

18:27-18:54:

Wanda: Do you think she dyed her hair when she was working?
Rosa: Maybe?
Wanda: Do you think she dyed it darker?
Rosa: No. Maybe she had light hair.
Wanda: Do you ever remember with her hair dark?
Rosa: No.
Brian: But.. it? I can save you all this trouble because, uh, just recently I found an interview with a co-worker, Buell Frazier, who worked at the Book Depository?


Quite a nifty segue there, Brian! Frazier, in the interview you go on to cite, says precisely NOTHING about Sarah's hair. Well played, sir! Thumb1:

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #438 on: July 03, 2018, 12:13:43 PM »
No! Please help?

Let's have another go!
LHO being Prayer Man would challenge the longstanding assumption of many CTs that the conspirators wanted to set him up as the sixth-floor shooter.
The fact that LHO being Prayer Man would challenge a longstanding CT assumption has no bearing whatsoever on whether or not Prayer Man is LHO.


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #438 on: July 03, 2018, 12:13:43 PM »


Offline Duncan MacRae

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 455
    • JFK Assassination Photographs
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #439 on: July 03, 2018, 12:23:13 PM »
The elimination of Sarah Stanton and the fine probative work of Stancak et al, have moved this into the territory of Beyond Reasonable Doubt IMO. The AnybodyButOswald crew are sounding more and more desperate. They're out of alternative candidates!  :'(

Sarah Stanton has not been eliminated

What The "It's Gotta Be Oswald At The Entrance At All Costs" crew have to say doesn't count in the real world where facts are King.