Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Ray Mitcham, Dale Nason and 45 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 197329 times)

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 508
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #280 on: June 15, 2018, 08:50:09 PM »
The comment about what SarahStanton reportedly said was actually a reference to her being labeled a teller of non truths.

I don't understand. What I asked you was, where and when did Stanton say she saw Oswald?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #280 on: June 15, 2018, 08:50:09 PM »


Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 438
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #281 on: June 15, 2018, 09:01:25 PM »
I have no desire, or intent, to promote, or embrace any false assertion(s) as evidence as to the identity of PrayerPersonImage.

Promotion of a VirtualEntrancePortal at the TexasSchoolBookDepository, along with VirtualOccupants of the VirtualStairs/Landing, is a promoter's perception, not reality. And, said perception appears to promote a viewpoint, without regard for for authentic persons, nor accurate placement.

Unfortunately, there also appears to be ImageInsertions "added" to a photo/film still, that is not seen in other versions. So, I suppose the question is,at least for me, are the ImageInsertions based on VirtualImages? Or, are the VirtualImages based on ImageInsertions?


Although some references made here, the VirtualImages and ImageInsertions appear to be promoted on another forum(s), for the most part.

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 508
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #282 on: June 15, 2018, 09:13:52 PM »
This is over guys...In this video Buell Frazier clearly describes "Standing in the shadows up on the 'landing' " (Buell calls it a space) after Calvery ran up shouting...He says that he and Sarah were standing in the shadows talking about what Calvery had said...Prayer Man is in the shadows and Frazier is seen facing and talking to "him"...
...

He also describes going down to the first step before this crying woman came by, anyway let's not focus on that, he also said they were both standing in the shadows, so let's assume his memory is that good after all this time(which I actually cannot do), then the unidentified person to his left could be her and since they are much closer to each other...

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #282 on: June 15, 2018, 09:13:52 PM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1310
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #283 on: June 15, 2018, 09:31:13 PM »

In his cheap defamation of me Jim ignores that my e-mail that was posted by Hargrove possessed a serious new witnessing of Oswald being seen by Stanton drinking a Coke by the lunch room...

LOL!

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 438
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #284 on: June 15, 2018, 09:32:31 PM »
I don't understand. What I asked you was, where and when did Stanton say she saw Oswald?

Actually, Mr Pollard, I do not know where she was nor when she reportedly made the comment. ???

If you need additional information about said subject, I refer you to your own post/reply from June 9, 2018, where you quoted Mr Doyle, and appeared to dispute the report of said comment.
::)

In any event, I see no need for additional space for said subject, therefor our discussion of this issue is now complete. >:(
« Last Edit: April 24, 2019, 07:44:19 PM by Larry Trotter »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #284 on: June 15, 2018, 09:32:31 PM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1310
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #285 on: June 15, 2018, 09:38:14 PM »

"I did not see Lee Harvey Oswald at that time or at any time during that day". -- Sarah Stanton, 3/18/64

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62312&relPageId=20

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 508
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #286 on: June 15, 2018, 09:44:33 PM »
I have no desire, or intent, to promote, or embrace any false assertion(s) as evidence as to the identity of PrayerPersonImage.

Promotion of a VirtualEntrancePortal at the TexasSchoolBookDepository, along with VirtualOccupants of the VirtualStairs/Landing, is a promoter's perception, not reality. And, said perception appears to promote a viewpoint, without regard for for authentic persons, nor accurate placement.

Unfortunately, there also appears to be ImageInsertions "added" to a photo/film still, that is not seen in other versions. So, I suppose the question is,at least for me, are the ImageInsertions based on VirtualImages? Or, are the VirtualImages based on ImageInsertions?.

Are you aware that you are promoting it just by referring to it?
It's his interpretaion of the evidence and even though it matches it in almost every way, I doubt anyone is confusing it with reality but your concern is noted.
If you are referring to the "small figure" on the east in Darnell, which I couldn't see in the moving footage then yes, that is one insertion based on his interpretation, now what other insertion have you noticed yourself?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #286 on: June 15, 2018, 09:44:33 PM »


Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 438
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #287 on: June 15, 2018, 09:56:24 PM »
"I did not see Lee Harvey Oswald at that time or at any time during that day". -- Sarah Stanton, 3/18/64

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62312&relPageId=20

Duly noted, Mr Nickerson. I think I understand some reasoning for "opposing statements", but it requires more study. In any event, I repeat, the comment was primarily due to my reading a comment referring to SarahStanton as a teller of non truths.

Having a statement, and an "opposing reported comment" indicates a possible error, not worthy of referring to a now deceased person as a teller of non truths.

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 508
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #288 on: June 15, 2018, 10:04:36 PM »
Brian,
As surely evident, again without reliable evidence supporting the LeeHarveyOswald/PrayerManTheory, the presented evidence indicating PrayerPersonImage to be a female, then employed at the TexasSchoolBookDepository building, continues to be "discounted", and disputed.

Sadly, now even SarahDeanStanton has been labeled as a "teller of non truths", simply because she indicated herself to have seen LHO on the second floor, just before her going down to the first floor, and onto the entrance landing.


Edited:For RayMitcham.

Quoted in full. Speaks for itself, actually no it doesn't.
Above you were promoting thirdhand hearsay from Brian as evidence and were apparently upset how others didn't take it for granted as a fact.
This is exactly what I am getting at, your perception of what constitutes real evidence/proof.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #288 on: June 15, 2018, 10:04:36 PM »


Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 508
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #289 on: June 15, 2018, 10:21:14 PM »
Larry, do us all a favour,
when you refer to people calling witnesses liars, be specific, name them or where they are saying it, "other there" or initials work.
Now grab something tight.
Witnesses get it wrong all the time and yes it's been proven, witnesses lie, in fact we all do, everyday, with all manner of people and the only way to avoid it is stop talking and remain perfectly still.