Prayer Woman

[Barry Pollard]

Reminder for sidekick Larry.
Listen to the interview again yet?
The "Davidson enhancement" is what you should be hearing(or denying), that's what the above image represents according to Brian.

[Barry Pollard]

You tell us that Wanda said that the monkeyface is "too pretty to be Sarah" but you then get Rosa to look it at, she then does so.  Without even being asked she immeadiately and without hesitation says "no, that's not",  Wanda then asks her the question "does it even look like her?" the response again is "no".   Both you and SL seem to be denying this.

It then continues, you say "but it's definetly a woman" and Wanda agrees, Rosa says "my daughter[meaning Sarah] looks something like a ..[unintelligible](did you catch it?).
You then, right in their faces, tell them with relief in your voice "thank you"  and that's all you need from her because that means it's not LHO, like it's some seal from the pope, then you switched topics to height and then the call ends.

No change of mind detected, so give us a timestamp where she says "maybe".

Sidekicks, pay attention (KEYWORDS: "Davidson enhancement" ie, Monkeyface).
https://youtu.be/QNI8z2SlV8Q?t=21m



Does Wanda have experience in the photographical interpretation field or was this her maiden voyage?

[Larry Trotter]

So why has no one managed to get a better copy of the image, it seems the obvious first thing that should be done.
Why not redirect everyone's efforts into getting a better image, set up a "gofundme", pick both a well known CT and LN to oversea the image acquisition and raise some serious money to make it reality.

I do not see any relative connection for any reason to "pick both a well known CT and LN to oversea(sp) the image acquisition and raise some serious money to make it reality".

Maybe those that wish to pursue the LeeHarveyOswald/PrayerManTheory would care to be involved, but those that study the evidence indicating that PrayerPersonImage represents a female then employed at the TexasSchoolBookDepository, Ms SarahJuanitaDeanStanton, most likely see no need to do so.

[Barry Pollard]

"My daughter looks something like this" okay that's on it's own seems possible but since you didn't ask, how do you know what image was she looking at right then?
Certainly not the monkey because she already said "no, that's not her" then "no" again and then "she[in the "enhancement"] looks too young".
If she could change her mind that quickly you may as well dismiss everything she said.

What other images apart from the CD enhancement did she have in front her?
I'll bet she was looking at a fuller Wiegman and pointing at Reece.

[Barry Pollard]

You going to tell me you never noticed?

[Anthony Clayden]

Gary Mack told me via Email that not only do they have it, they have THE film(Darnell) but to keep quite because there's problems with the rights to it. 

Film was shot in 1963, wouldn't only be covered for copyright laws at the time it was created. In the US, that was 28 years plus an additional 28 years that could be applied for. So even with the extension it would be out of copyright in 2019. Or is he concerned that the family will move for ownership of the original and sell it off?

[Barry Pollard]

Film was shot in 1963, wouldn't only be covered for copyright laws at the time it was created. In the US, that was 28 years plus an additional 28 years that could be applied for. So even with the extension it would be out of copyright in 2019. Or is he concerned that the family will move for ownership of the original and sell it off?

I didn't question or pursue it Anthony, IIRC I got the impression that, they had it but couldn't use/sell/rent/hire/display it until the rights were properly established.
If it were down to Gary alone I get the feeling that he would want Darnell to benefit at least a little(Jimmy was still alive then too 2014/15 IIRC).