Prayer Woman

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 1114097 times)

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #861 on: September 05, 2018, 01:18:57 AM »
There's no such thing in testimony, if it proved anything at all there would be no point to this forum.
Avoiding this giant cowpat in your logic proves to me that you're just not being honest.

Give yourself a week and try coming back with some kind of defence of your archaic attitude.

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #862 on: September 05, 2018, 01:38:17 AM »
To me it's obvious it's the young reporter but proving it is another thing.
Hand on hip, someone like Carl Edward Jones still in position on steps, some cop leaning over to speak with Sawyer, that's what I see in the footage so...

Offline Anthony Clayden

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 77
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #863 on: September 05, 2018, 01:41:41 AM »
Can't help feel that this thread reminds of Douglas Adams, description of the philosophers objection to Deep Thought. To paraphase from memory, "What is point of us spending all night argueing over whether God does or does not exist, only for this computer to give us his address in the morning"

What is the point of 188 pages argueing over blurry images, when someone could go back to the more original versions of the films, get a cleares image and make the whole 188 pages worthless. The real question is why hasn't anyone been able to make any real advance in getting clearer images in the last 5 years, surely it is both sides interest to do so.

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #864 on: September 05, 2018, 01:50:55 AM »
Other things I noticed when looking for that timeframe.
HB needed a bodyguard.


Here's the two of them heading for Sawyer's vehicle(with Don Cook talking to reporter).


Crowd is disspersed(including Phil Willis) and witnesses ferried to DPD sometime before the Brennan/Sawyer/Euins conference is over.


For the record.

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #865 on: September 05, 2018, 02:24:55 AM »
Can't help feel that this thread reminds of Douglas Adams, description of the philosophers objection to Deep Thought. To paraphase from memory, "What is point of us spending all night argueing over whether God does or does not exist, only for this computer to give us his address in the morning"

What is the point of 188 pages argueing over blurry images, when someone could go back to the more original versions of the films, get a cleares image and make the whole 188 pages worthless. The real question is why hasn't anyone been able to make any real advance in getting clearer images in the last 5 years, surely it is both sides interest to do so.

What is the point of playing/watching sports when we could just flip a coin to decide who wins?  "How do you get to Carnegie hall?"
There's more than just blurry images in here but seeing things in that record has always been a major part of this case, I doubt it will ever go away and it is after all, something anyone can do.  Also if a decent image proves it's Oswald then it would hardly be worthless but inspirational.

Offline Anthony Clayden

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 77
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #866 on: September 05, 2018, 03:10:40 AM »
So why has no one managed to get a better copy of the image, it seems the obvious first thing that should be done.
Why not redirect everyone's efforts into getting a better image, set up a "gofundme", pick both a well known CT and LN to oversea the image acquisition and raise some serious money to make it reality.

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #867 on: September 05, 2018, 04:03:25 AM »
Google "the search for Wiegman and Darnell films" Anthony.
Funding idea is good but first you have to find something worth buying.

Gary Mack told me via Email that not only do they have it, they have THE film(Darnell) but to keep quite because there's problems with the rights to it.  I wasn't even asking/concerned about PM I just was blown away by the unique footage for itself, first shared here by Robin Unger I believe.  I didn't really have a relationship with him but I assume he could tell my interest was genuine.  I have no reason to believe he would take me into his confidence either, so he may have been spinning me a line but he was pretty straight with me previously.

Ask yourself and I know for most everyone it's a longshot but if it does look even more like Oswald in "quality footage" would you expect the SFM to part with it?
Personally no, if that was the case I don't think we'll ever see it from them but I don't think they'd kill both Murphy and Mack to keep it safe either.
So secrets and coincidence perhaps but you know, it's interesting.