Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 1230642 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #742 on: July 27, 2018, 09:50:42 PM »
Like I said, nice try.
Oh, you said well that changes everything.

JohnM



« Last Edit: July 27, 2018, 09:57:51 PM by John Mytton »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #743 on: July 27, 2018, 10:05:55 PM »
Oh, you said well that changes everything.

Shut up, "Mytton", the grownups are talking.  You don't believe that PP is Oswald, so you're just in this thread to troll me.

Very badly.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #744 on: July 27, 2018, 10:13:31 PM »
Shut up, "Mytton", the grownups are talking.  You don't believe that PP is Oswald, so you're just in this thread to troll me.

Very badly.



Quote
Shut up, "Mytton", the grownups are talking.

grownups. LOL!

Quote
You don't believe that PP is Oswald

How do you know what I believe?

Quote
so you're just in this thread to troll me.

No, I just came across more of your inconsistencies.

Quote
Very badly.

If I was in fact trolling I would seek to get a response and upset my victim so in other words I'm doing Very Good!



JohnM

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #745 on: July 27, 2018, 10:25:50 PM »
Hmmm "I've read it" vs "I tend to gloss over"



Quote
Wow, our Forum No.1 Liar strikes again, Oops!

..and yet you can't point to a single thing I've lied about.  Hmmm....

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #746 on: July 27, 2018, 10:28:37 PM »
How do you know what I believe?

Because you're a nutter.  You think that Oswald was up in the sixth floor firing a rifle.  Not that you have any evidence of that either...

Quote
No, I just came across more of your inconsistencies.

That's not an inconsistency.  That's just more of your ineptitude in the construction of a logical argument.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #747 on: July 27, 2018, 11:42:30 PM »
Frazier. He has repeatedly been asked about the PP figure. Not once has he suggested it is a female, still less that it is Stanton. Go figure.

Frazier said that Stanton remained to his left?  Please cite.

Quote
No offence, John, but you're arguing like a LNer.

I don't like unfounded assumptions and handwaving from any side.

Quote
Why would we distrust the shared memory of Stanton's daughter-in-law and granddaughter as to what she many times talked about?

Versus a first-hand account from Stanton herself?

Quote
Exactly. Who knows? So let's stop dismissing PP=LHO as though we already know where LHO was. Let's leave that to the LNers.

The right thing to do is to dismiss any claim that can't be demonstrated to be true.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #748 on: July 28, 2018, 08:28:29 AM »
Frazier said that Stanton remained to his left?  Please cite.

You misunderstand (wilfully, I suspect): Frazier has many, many times identified Stanton as standing beside him on the landing. He obviously has a strong memory/association of her being there. Yet when shown PP, and pressed as to who it might be, she has not even entered into his head as a candidate. All he has been 'able' to offer is: Well, it's not Billy Lovelady or Bill Shelley, coz they'd already left the steps.

What does this tell us? Simply this: Stanton was to his left, she didn't do a cartwheel way over to his right between JFK turning onto Elm and Wiegman starting to film, and PP looks nothing like her.

This is not complicated, John. The Stanton theory is dead. It's not pining. It's dead. Your refusal to acknowledge this speaks only to your bias, your glib approach to the topic, and your glaring inability to come up with a credible non-LHO candidate.

Quote
Versus a first-hand account from Stanton herself?

That would have been ideal, but if Stanton made the understandable decision to opt for a quiet life and not tell the 'investigators' about LHO by the second-floor lunchroom, then who are we to judge? Besides, the FBI would only have done a Carolyn Arnold on her statement.

Luckily, however, she told a consistent story to her family over the years of seeing LHO by the second-floor lunchroom before the assassination. With a coke in his hand. I see no good reason to accuse her-----or Rose and Wanda-----of lying. Do you?

Quote
The right thing to do is to dismiss any claim that can't be demonstrated to be true.

And yet you refuse to dismiss a claim that has been demonstrated to be untrue (Stanton=LHO). Ho hum.