Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Peter Kleinschmidt and 27 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 247110 times)

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 425
  • PrayerWoman it is to see..PrayerMan is not to be..
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4760 on: July 23, 2019, 07:47:52 AM »
As previously posted:

"Notably, research has now developed evidence indicative of SarahStanton as being the person represented by PrayerPersonImage aka PrayerWomanImage."

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
This is not true, no matter how many times you post it.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
The burden of proof for JohnIacoletti's statement is on Mr Iacoletti, no matter how many times he wishes to claim another poster is being untruthful.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
No, the burden of proof is on you to demonstrate that "research has now developed evidence indicative of SarahStanton as being the person represented by Prayer PersonImage".  What research?  What evidence?  Are you going to avoid the question again?

Research(noun):diligent and systematic inquiry into a subject in order to discover or revise facts, theories, etc.
Evidence(noun):the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
Indicating(verb):to be a sign of;betoken;evidence;show:
Indicative(adjective):serving as a sign or indication of something.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

As noted, a partial rendering of research developed indicative evidence that  indicates SarahStanton is the person represented by PrayerPersonImage aka PrayerWomanImage.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2019, 05:20:53 PM by Larry Trotter »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4760 on: July 23, 2019, 07:47:52 AM »

Offline Mark A. Oblazney

  • Full Member
  • ***

  • This Member Has Made
    A Forum Donation!
  • Posts: 147
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4761 on: July 24, 2019, 09:52:57 AM »
I still think it was a dude taking pictures with a camera.  Couldn't that be possible?  Just from looking at that brief film footage/stills of him holding up what I believe is a camera?

Offline Rick Plant

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4762 on: July 25, 2019, 01:59:11 AM »
To me there is a figure holding an object but it's not clear what that object is. It's interesting to read everybody's take on this subject  but there is no way somebody can 100% conclusively determine who a figure is when the figure is a blob or a heavily distorted image.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4762 on: July 25, 2019, 01:59:11 AM »

Online Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1317
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4763 on: July 25, 2019, 09:46:55 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I still think it was a dude taking pictures with a camera.  Couldn't that be possible?  Just from looking at that brief film footage/stills of him holding up what I believe is a camera?

Mark,

Do you think a camera lens in the shade like that would have reflected that much light?

-- MWT  ;)


Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 937
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4764 on: July 26, 2019, 01:31:22 AM »
On film....

Oswald: I work in that building.

Reporter: Were you in that building at the time?

Oswald: Naturally if I work in that building, yes sir.


Therefore, Oswald was not out on the front steps or on the landing.

If Oswald was not out on the front steps or the landing, then he is not Prayer Man/Prayer Woman.

So, who cares who that person was?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4764 on: July 26, 2019, 01:31:22 AM »

Offline Tom Scully

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 502
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4765 on: July 26, 2019, 04:02:46 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
On film....

Oswald: I work in that building.

Reporter: Were you in that building at the time?

Oswald: Naturally if I work in that building, yes sir.


Therefore, Oswald was not out on the front steps or on the landing.

If Oswald was not out on the front steps or the landing, then he is not Prayer Man/Prayer Woman.

So, who cares who that person was?

Bill Brown, not many years ago, you visited Ruth Paine. I am reposting this quote here.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Question for Bill Brown.:

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Removing your Sandinista (sourced from Carol Hewett as retold by DiEugenio or perhaps Bill Kelly?  ) suspicions,
This is what remains. (quoted below):

....I shared the following details with Jim DiEugenio on November 15, 2015. It appears since then DiEugenio preferred to keep you from awareness of these facts.
Could it be because these facts are less prejudicial to Ruth Paine's rep?....
Kindly respond there, especially if you are familiar with past suspicions of Ruth's work in Nicaragua. Thank you.
« Last Edit: July 26, 2019, 04:03:56 AM by Tom Scully »

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 606
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4766 on: July 28, 2019, 12:47:32 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As I do not recall ever affording any EvidentiaryValue to the as presented PrayerPersonImage FacialFeatureEnhancement, often attributed to ChrisDavidson, perhaps BarryPollard can provide any documented posting as confirmation for my having done so(?)

Larry you haven't any experience in image manipulation, so your opinion in this field isn't really worth reading let alone remembering but here's the point.  Brian produced taped evidence that the face he likes as Stanton was dismissed by two people that actually knew her and here was your only contribution when I focused on it;

Quote
I thought the "not her" comment attributed to Wanda and/or Rosa... was in reference to ScarfLadyImage

You never corrected your mistake or commented on it again.  Would you care to do so now or talk on it's significance to Brian's overall agenda?  I've already guessed it's a no, so there you go, a chance to prove me wrong, a first.
I can think of no other significant evidence that Brian produced in that "interview" and that's what you call research?  A diligent and systematic inquiry, it was not.  It was agenda driven but that's something else you rather conveniently failed to pick up on right?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4766 on: July 28, 2019, 12:47:32 PM »

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 606
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4767 on: July 28, 2019, 01:29:12 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As noted, a partial rendering of research developed indicative evidence that  indicates SarahStanton is the person represented by PrayerPersonImage aka PrayerWomanImage.

That junk has been around for almost six decades and everyone that you'd call even half a researcher has been over it three or four times at least, so are you saying that it has only "recently developed" IN YOUR MIND?  Ahh, I see.  Welcome to the case.  May I ask what you were doing all these years before PM became an issue?

Witness testimony doesn't mean as much as it used to.  You're stuck in the past and you won't even begin to look for a way out of that nasty little hole you are caught in.  Even if the prosectution wasn't biased as it was, you'd still be playing a dangerous game by throwing the word "evidence" around when referring to testimony.  Circumstantial is what it is, at best.  We have far better stuff pointing us all to the Grassy Knoll.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4767 on: July 28, 2019, 01:29:12 PM »

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 606
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4768 on: July 28, 2019, 01:47:06 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Mark,

Do you think a camera lens in the shade like that would have reflected that much light?

-- MWT  ;)

It's a good question.  From the options put forward, white enamel makes the most sense for me at this time, despite the procimity of that discarded pop bottle found near, what would have been, Oswald's right foot.  "Camera" seems to be lifted toward his mouth too.

Offline Mark A. Oblazney

  • Full Member
  • ***

  • This Member Has Made
    A Forum Donation!
  • Posts: 147
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4769 on: July 30, 2019, 12:05:30 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It's a good question.  From the options put forward, white enamel makes the most sense for me at this time, despite the procimity of that discarded pop bottle found near, what would have been, Oswald's right foot.  "Camera" seems to be lifted toward his mouth too.

In my humble opinion, it WAS a camera.  I believe this was someone that came off the street, not a TSBD employee at all, but just a dude that wanted a better resolution of the prez' a-goin' by..... and then...... bye-bye.  The Crime of the Century.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4769 on: July 30, 2019, 12:05:30 PM »

 

Mobile View