Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Jerry Freeman, Joe Simmons and 32 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 200445 times)

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4782
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4400 on: May 11, 2019, 12:33:53 AM »
Also, it's a wee bit rich throwing quotes out from someone you already think is a teller of non truths, loner, wife beater and #1 scumbag of all time for killing your hero(no offence).

Yeah...."Oswald was a l-i-a-r....except when he wasn't".
« Last Edit: May 11, 2019, 12:35:22 AM by John Iacoletti »

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4782
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4401 on: May 11, 2019, 12:34:46 AM »
Oswald shot Kennedy.  Get over it, folks.  Bang, Bang, Bang.  His lucky day.  Sigh+

And you'll never be able to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.  Get over it, folks.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4401 on: May 11, 2019, 12:34:46 AM »


Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 913
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4402 on: May 11, 2019, 09:41:32 AM »
And now, some 55+ years later, there is still not any eyewitness testimony/statement placing LeeHarveyOswald on the TSBD Bldg Elm St Entrance Landing at 12:30pm CST on 11/22/'63, and/or at the time of the Assassination of JFK Sr and Wounding of JBC Jr. And, among potential eyewitnesses were many co-workers, including BuellWesleyFrazier that LHO rode to work with that very morning, who would have recognized the soon to be, arguably, the most famous accused LoneGunmanAssassin of all time.

Indeed.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 913
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4403 on: May 11, 2019, 09:41:58 AM »
Depends on which account of the interrogations you want to go with.

That's my point.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4403 on: May 11, 2019, 09:41:58 AM »


Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4404 on: May 11, 2019, 02:02:34 PM »
That's my point.

Ah, but there's a difference, Mr Brown!

That the official published interrogation reports would say nothing about Mr Oswald's claim to have gone outside to watch the Presidential parade makes perfect sense to me. I don't run away from it. Mr Oswald's claim was suppressed because it was too dangerous for the Oswald-Acted-Alone investigation.

You, on the other hand. Well... Let's see. You are shown this in the unofficial handwritten interrogation notes of Agent Hosty:



"Then went outside to watch P. parade."

This is clearly something that you cannot explain (unless you wish to press the absurd case that an FBI agent would misunderstand the claimed whereabouts of the suspect in the assassination of President Kennedy?).

So what do you do? Simple! You pretend it doesn't exist. Too inconvenient. Best ignored.  :)

But hey, Mr Brown, that's okay. We understand where you're coming from: the very same Warren Gullibility comfort zone where your fellow propagandists like Mr von Pein and Prof McAdams reside. If ignoring uncongenial evidence keeps you happy, then we're happy for you!  Thumb1:

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 913
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4405 on: May 12, 2019, 07:52:53 AM »
On film....

Oswald: I work in that building.

Reporter: Were you in that building at the time?

Oswald: Naturally if I work in that building, yes sir.


Therefore, Oswald was not out on the front steps or on the landing.

If Oswald was not out on the front steps or the landing, then he is not Prayer Man/Prayer Woman.

So, who cares who that person was?
« Last Edit: May 12, 2019, 07:54:20 AM by Bill Brown »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4405 on: May 12, 2019, 07:52:53 AM »


Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 649
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4406 on: May 12, 2019, 09:13:54 AM »
On film....

Oswald: I work in that building.

Reporter: Were you in that building at the time?

Oswald: Naturally if I work in that building, yes sir.


Therefore, Oswald was not out on the front steps or on the landing.

If Oswald was not out on the front steps or the landing, then he is not Prayer Man/Prayer Woman.

So, who cares who that person was?

Define "at that time", Bill.

Online Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 940
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4407 on: May 12, 2019, 10:03:43 AM »
Define "at that time", Bill.

Ray,

He obviously was asking him if he was in the building when the I Love Lucy rerun came on.

-- MWT   ;)

« Last Edit: May 12, 2019, 10:39:20 AM by Thomas Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4407 on: May 12, 2019, 10:03:43 AM »


Offline Michael Walton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 182
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4408 on: May 12, 2019, 11:49:59 AM »
Ray - Tom Graves recently revealed on a post his Despise List. It was taken down by the admin because it also included some other stuff in it and whoever reported it, the post was removed and Graves was suspended here for a while.

The reason why I'm bringing this up is because when folks on this board say Oswald did it all by himself, they're pretty much Kennedy haters. Graves is one of them based on what he revealed. Therefore, you're never going to get incisive and objective analysis from the likes of Graves and others. Put another way, it's like a police detective who has a hatred of prostitutes - and when one is found dead on the street, the detective's work trying to solve her crime is clouded by, "Nahh, she deserved it..." or whatever other bias this cop would have toward her.

The same with the Kennedy case. So it's fruitless to keep arguing this over and over again because hate is very, very strong emotion. We simply can't expect a hater to become all Grinch like, see the light, and open his mind to fair analysis on this case.

NOTE - I know this is probably an unpopular thing to discuss or bring up here but it really does make a difference in how someone perceives the merits of the JFK case.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2019, 11:58:22 AM by Michael Walton »

Online Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 940
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4409 on: May 12, 2019, 04:15:15 PM »
Ray - Tom Graves recently revealed on a post his Despise List. It was taken down by the admin because it also included some other stuff in it and whoever reported it, the post was removed and Graves was suspended here for a while.

The reason why I'm bringing this up is because when folks on this board say Oswald did it all by himself, they're pretty much Kennedy haters. Graves is one of them based on what he revealed. Therefore, you're never going to get incisive and objective analysis from the likes of Graves and others. Put another way, it's like a police detective who has a hatred of prostitutes - and when one is found dead on the street, the detective's work trying to solve her crime is clouded by, "Nahh, she deserved it..." or whatever other bias this cop would have toward her.

The same with the Kennedy case. So it's fruitless to keep arguing this over and over again because hate is very, very strong emotion. We simply can't expect a hater to become all Grinch like, see the light, and open his mind to fair analysis on this case.

NOTE - I know this is probably an unpopular thing to discuss or bring up here but it really does make a difference in how someone perceives the merits of the JFK case.

Walton,

As regards the JFK assassination, WTF is wrong with my despising "researchers" and wannabe pundits (such as yourself) whom I consider to be witting or unwitting purveyors of Ruskie active measures (since 1921) and strategic deceptions (since 1959)-based propaganda?

Should I love you (plural), instead?

Show you compassion (that's what you want, isn't it -- that and respect?)?

Accept your mistake-laden arguments, theories, and self-righteous, oh-so-indignant pronouncements?

(Dramatic pause ...)

(Sigh ...)

Yeah, I guess you're right, Michael.

I no longer despise you and your ilk.

Now I'm just weeping for all of the brainwashed-by-KGB-via-Rush-and-Alex Trump supporters out there.

-- MWT  :)

PS  Carry on, Michael Walton. Commissar James "Jumbo Duh" DiEugenio and his deputies have great hopes for you!

PPS  Yes, I've already read State Secret. Have you read Spy Wars and Chapter 10 of Wedge, yet? Get back to me when you have.

PPPS Here's a mouth-watering morsel for you: I now believe Bagley's "help" in interviewing Nosenko in Geneva in 1962, "expert handler" George Kisevalter, was a mole may have been a mole. He was King Midas In Reverse in that all the gold he touched turned to you-know what.

Popov, Penkovsky.  And the clincher: He adamantly asserted until the end that Yuri Nosenko was a true defector!

LOL

« Last Edit: May 13, 2019, 08:00:42 PM by Thomas Graves »

 

Mobile View