Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Steve Howsley, Nicholas Turner, Alan J. Ford and 82 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 81917 times)

Online Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 550
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2050 on: November 08, 2018, 05:29:20 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
No attempt to answer the evidence from Valenti...I personally would be embarrassed to enter such a statement in front of facts I was clearly unable to answer...

Seems you must  be embarrassed then, Brian. :D

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2050 on: November 08, 2018, 05:29:20 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3210
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2051 on: November 08, 2018, 05:30:43 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
One look at the Couch/Darnell clip shows Frazier and Prayer Man looking at each other for the entire length of the clip...I believe you failed to respond to this Duncan when I posted it...

The entire length of the clip?  You mean the ENTIRE half second?   :D

Given that you can't see either Frazier's or PM's face in Darnell, I think the claim that they are looking at each other is just more Doyle BS.

Quote
And don't forget Lovelady placed Stanton to Frazier's right when listing those closest to him in order from his left to his right...

What do you mean "don't forget"?  Lovelady never said that he was listing those closest to him in order from his left to his right.  That's just another Doyle lie.

Online Mark Valenti

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2052 on: November 08, 2018, 08:47:49 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
No attempt to answer the evidence from Valenti...I personally would be embarrassed to enter such a statement in front of facts I was clearly unable to answer...

Baloney. You have proven yourself incapable of embarrassment.

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 387
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2053 on: November 11, 2018, 06:50:40 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Mr Doyle doesn't want to talk about 18:24 of this video.....  :(


If Prayer Person only showed up in Darnell, then the Stanton=PrayerPerson theory wouldn't be utterly-utterly ridiculous. It would merely be utterly ridiculous, for all Mr Doyle would have to do would be to convince us that Ms Stanton wore a dark wig to work that day!  :D

It is my quite well studied developed conclusion, that any claim that PrayerPersonImage represents LeeHarveyOswald is totally ridiculous. Simply put, said claim means that the accused LoneGunmanAssassin is on the landing during the assassination, among other occupants, but somehow went unnoticed for some half century.

In any event, should you, poster known as AlanFord, wish to declare that SarahStanton as PrayerPersonImage to be an utterly ridiculous theory, perhaps you can indicate your choice for the person represented by PrayerPersonImage, and as well, indicate your choice for where SarahStanton might be, if not in the PrayerPersonImage space on the somewhat small landing.
« Last Edit: November 11, 2018, 06:52:13 PM by Larry Trotter »

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 387
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2054 on: November 11, 2018, 07:58:27 PM »
It is my somewhat well studied developed conclusion that BuellWesleyFrazier's statements and/or comments are indicative of SarahDeanStanton, above all other landing/stairs occupants, as being the person represented by PrayerPersonImage, as filmed/pictured at 12:30pm CST, 11/22/'63.

Any request for evidentiary information for a declaration that literally, BuellWesleyFrazier literally declared PrayerPersonImage to represent SarahDeanStanton, does have merit in my opinion.

However, in my opinion, any literal declaration that BuellWesleyFrazier never literally declared PrayerPersonImage to represent SarahDeanStanton, is hopefully afforded the same evidentiary information stipulation.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2054 on: November 11, 2018, 07:58:27 PM »


Online Alan J. Ford

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
    • JFK Q & A
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2055 on: November 14, 2018, 05:34:19 PM »
To avoid any further confusion with Sarah Stanton as the indvidual behind Lovelady, let's highlight  a definitive portion of Billy Nolan Lovelady's testimony, where he makes it crystal clear that Mrs. Stanton stood With him, not Behind him ---->

Mr. BALL - You ate your lunch on the steps?
Mr. LOVELADY - Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL - Who was with you?
Mr. LOVELADY - Bill Shelley and Sarah Stanton, and right behind me


Of course Warren Commission counsel quickly redirects Lovelady before he could elaborate further about the individual behind him ---->

Mr. BALL - What was that last name?
Mr. LOVELADY - Stanton.
Mr. BALL - What is the first name?
Mr. LOVELADY - Bill Shelley.
Mr. BALL - And Stanton's first name?
Mr. LOVELADY - Miss Sarah Stanton.
Mr. BALL - Did you stay on the steps
Mr. LOVELADY - Yes.


We can all agree there's a major difference between standing with our family and/or friends at a sporting event, or at a favourite outdoor concert as oppose to saying I attended a sporting event and/or favourite music concert, but my family and friends stood behind me.

Now with that point made (really the reason I signed in), please let me wish all a safe & happy holiday season ahead right into the new year--Alan Ford LINK DELETED: Links To websites which contain materials or links to materials which are unsuitable for viewing by minors is forbidden
« Last Edit: November 14, 2018, 05:48:04 PM by Alan J. Ford »

Offline Mark A. Oblazney

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2056 on: November 14, 2018, 09:26:59 PM »
It was a dude taking pictures with a camera, possibly came off the street for a better shadowesque view in lieu of the sun-plane.  Where have I heard that before?

 

Offline Alan Ford

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 438
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2057 on: November 14, 2018, 09:58:26 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It was a dude taking pictures with a camera, possibly came off the street for a better shadowesque view in lieu of the sun-plane.  Where have I heard that before?

If you accept that it's a dude (and you're right!), then it's but a tiny step to accepting that it might be a dude named Lee Harvey Oswald. He would have been much less conspicuous amidst all those Depository employees than a randomer off the street!



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2057 on: November 14, 2018, 09:58:26 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3210
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2058 on: November 14, 2018, 10:34:23 PM »
It's a blob of undifferentiated pixels.  Anybody who tells you different is engaging in wishful thinking.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 438
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2059 on: November 14, 2018, 10:54:21 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It's a blob of undifferentiated pixels.  Anybody who tells you different is engaging in wishful thinking.

Okay, so it's a blob of undifferentiated pixels.
Therefore you would be unwilling, based on the undifferentiated-pixel character of the blobby image, to rule out the possibility that it might be a bald black man?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2059 on: November 14, 2018, 10:54:21 PM »