Again Ray...You are making an extremely dumb point there because Wiegman is the exact same scene a few seconds earlier and therefore possesses the same shadow...
Maybe but we are discussing Stancak's posting not your ramblings.
You seem to have difficulty comprehending what is being argued here...My point is that you have no right to demand we only look at the Darnell image because the Wiegman image is a credible comparison seeing how it is the exact same scene taken a few seconds earlier...
Why are you talking about Weigman, stupid? We are talking about the Darnell photo. the shadows on each are
different. but then I wouldn't expect you to be able to see that.
It is YOU who is not answering the question here and YOU have failed to answer why the Wiegman frame showing the same shadow line on Lovelady can't be used as a scientific comparison? In effect you are ignoring valid evidence and arguments and not answering for it...You are offering a fallacious argument...Just because Stancak used Darnell doesn't mean I can't refute it using Wiegman...Also, Stancak posted that he used a sun angle app to determine the shadow line...So you are not even right about that either...
You can't refute Stancak by using a different photo. You are just showing everybody how stupid you are.
As it happens Stancak has used the correct sun angle, but then if you disagree, tell us what you think the angle of the sun should be, or maybe people will think you are too stupid to answer,