Prayer Woman

[Larry Trotter]

     So exactly how does a person "WATCH" a Pre Parade?  There is Nothing going on for Oswald to WATCH. Also, Bear in mind the word WATCH is being notated by a Trained G-Man = his knowing the Importance of the nomenclature he is employing.  Plus, why would anyone Abbreviate the word PRE? Jotting down the letter P followed by that Period = 2 symbols vs PRE = 3. Who uses an abbreviation to save themselves from having to write a mere 1 extra letter?  In my opinion at the 3:15 Oswald Interrogation he did say he went outside to watch the presidential parade, though this was a lie. I believe Oswald used the term "Presidential Parade" to avoid specifically naming Kennedy and Immediately attaching himself to JFK.  This was written down due to the LBJ/J Edgar LN Theory not having been distributed down the Law Enforcement Food Chain at that time. These Notes being written on the Back Side of a DPD Affidavit Form were Lost and buried in the National Archives. Otherwise, they would have been Destroyed.   

I don't recall ever indicating anything regarding any Pre Parade, if you can produce said comment I will acknowledge your effort.

[John Iacoletti]

Reliable provable indicative e-v-i-d-e-n-t-i-a-r-y information is not required to support said conclusion. And, as I work on my spellin', maybe you can work on your readin'...

Ah, is that how it works?  Your conclusions require no evidence, but people require evidence to question your conclusions?  Nice double standard.

[Royell Storing]

Probably because mowing over a group of spectators isn't a good career move...

     Baker did Not have to mow anybody over.   Based on the Wiegman/Darnell films, there were More people streaming Down Elm + Baker on foot having to weave his way through people between his parked motorcycle and the TSBD vs the number of people Directly in front of the TSBD.

[Larry Trotter]

Ah, is that how it works?  Your conclusions require no evidence, but people require evidence to question your conclusions?  Nice double standard.

No double standard sir, read my post, and you are welcome to your own conclusion, as I stated, but any claim that my conclusion is wrong, requires evidence to be credible. Otherwise, simply a conclusion.

[John Iacoletti]

No double standard sir, read my post, and you are welcome to your own conclusion, as I stated, but any claim that my conclusion is wrong, requires evidence to be credible. Otherwise, simply a conclusion.

I claim that your conclusion is unsubstantiated.

"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence" -- Hitchens' razor

[Royell Storing]

When the conspirators "re-enacted" the imaginary scenario ...they started the stopwatch at the sound of the first shot when Baker had just turned right onto Houston from Main .....  ( incidentally ----Baker looked up toward the TSBD upper floors at the sound of the shot...and he saw NOTHING that drew his attention to the SE corner sixth floor window)  They stopped the watch when Baker reached the top step of the stairs on the second floor .....The first try was timed at 90 seconds...the second try 75 seconds....  So there were still two more shots to be fired when Baker started for the Roof of the TSBD.....I must have taken him at least 30 seconds to reach the curb near the front of the TSBD and park his bike.

     When you have a Witness doing multiple dress rehearsals with the Prosecuting Attorney they are getting their story straight.  This is why believing the Officer Baker testimony is hard to do. The WC Lawyer and Baker were doing their own version of Edgar Bergen & Charlie McCarthy.

[Alan Ford]

As I recall first seeing the posted "P Parade" quoted reference to the "noted comments" supposedly made by LeeOswald, I felt then, as I do now, quite possibly "P Parade" was an ad libitum by the note taker's interpretation regarding the stated activities during and/or about the time of the Motorcade passing the TSBD Bldg.
Admittedly, of course, a conclusion, and should anyone wish to conclude disagreement, that is beyond question their prerogative to do so and express such. However, any credible claim that my conclusion is totally wrong should be accompanied by reliable provable indicative evidentiary information

Edit:Spelling correction...

You want reliable provable indicative evidentiary information?

Coming right up!

Going outside to watch the Presidential Parade means going outside to watch the Presidential Parade.

You're welcome!