Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Buell Wesley Frazier  (Read 106366 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #216 on: October 05, 2018, 11:58:41 PM »
Advertisement
::)

Only in WallyWorld is 10 inches 'nearly touching' the ground.

On a dark and rainy morning who can say what Mrs Randle saw..... I'll grant you that 10 inches would be the extreme, but I'd hasten to point out that many boots are 10 inches tall...... 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #216 on: October 05, 2018, 11:58:41 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #217 on: October 06, 2018, 12:17:00 AM »
No, I don't think it will.  Linnie Mae always maintained that the bag he saw was shorter.  During her testimony they measured how long she estimated it to be with a mockup and came up with 27 inches one time and 28 1/2 inches the other time.  FBI agents would conduct their interviews and not take contemporaneous notes.  They would finish the interview and then go off and transcribe what they heard.  The WC should have asked her about this discrepancy because it very possible that Bookhout misunderstood her or didn't transcribe what she said properly.  We also don't know if she gave Bookhout a length herself or if Bookhout estimated it himself from her holding her hands apart or whatever.

Show us where the FBI didn't have Randle read over her 11.22.63 statement to confirm her statement as being accurate. And do you have a later denial of that initial bag length? And her later---conveniently, one might argue--- somewhat shrunken bag size appeared after the situation had grown rather onerous for the 'bro.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #218 on: October 06, 2018, 12:39:46 AM »
No, I don't think it will.  Linnie Mae always maintained that the bag he saw was shorter.  During her testimony they measured how long she estimated it to be with a mockup and came up with 27 inches one time and 28 1/2 inches the other time.  FBI agents would conduct their interviews and not take contemporaneous notes.  They would finish the interview and then go off and transcribe what they heard.  The WC should have asked her about this discrepancy because it very possible that Bookhout misunderstood her or didn't transcribe what she said properly.  We also don't know if she gave Bookhout a length herself or if Bookhout estimated it himself from her holding her hands apart or whatever.


The WC should have asked her about this discrepancy because it very possible that Bookhout misunderstood her or didn't transcribe what she said properly.  We also don't know if she gave Bookhout a length herself or if Bookhout estimated it himself from her holding her hands apart or whatever.

it very possible that Bookhout misunderstood her or didn't transcribe what she said properly.

You're being waaaaay too magnanimous ......  Bookhout is one of Hoover's agents who created a "replica bag" and then took it to the Randle residence in a transparent attempt to confuse Linnie Mae and her brother BWF and get them on record as confirming the "replica bag"  was exactly like the bag that Lee carried that morning.

We also don't know if she gave Bookhout a length herself or if Bookhout estimated it himself from her holding her hands apart

THINK about that.....Linnie held up her hands and indicated a length of about two feet.....  Three feet is considerably greater than two feet.  Bookhout could not have thought the distance between her hands was thee feet 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #218 on: October 06, 2018, 12:39:46 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #219 on: October 06, 2018, 01:20:31 AM »
Show us where the FBI didn't have Randle read over her 11.22.63 statement to confirm her statement as being accurate.

Really, Bill?

Show us where they did.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7407
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #220 on: October 06, 2018, 03:13:18 AM »
Really, Bill?

Show us where they did.

I wonder if Bill even knows what a FD 302 is, so perhaps this is useful?.


What is a 302?

FBI form FD-302 has space to list the name of the agents, the date of the interview, the name of the interviewee, the place of the interview and so forth. Then it allows the agent to draft a memo?in paragraph form?of what the witness said. It can be one page long or twenty pages long, depending on the length of the interview.
The memo section of a 302 is the key part. This is a combination of what the agent was able to write down during the interview and his recollection. It may list the questions and the answers or simply be a narrative of what the witness said.
The witness generally doesn?t see the 302 or get a chance to correct any mistakes he thinks are in it before it is finalized.

https://grandjurytarget.com/2017/05/18/what-is-an-fbi-302-the-problematic-nature-of-fbi-agents-interview-memos/


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #220 on: October 06, 2018, 03:13:18 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #221 on: October 06, 2018, 08:19:17 AM »
Does the package that Danny The Rat is holding look like CE 142??



LBJ's "Special Blue Ribbon Committee "    Told us that CE 142 was the sack that Lee used to carry the rifle .......( of course there wasn't a iota of physical evidence that any rifle had ever been in CE 142 , (but what hell.....They didn't need no stinkin physical evidence) 

Danny obviously ignores the WC theory (twisted though it be) and presents the viewers with his idea of the paper sack...

Try to follow along. Rather is demonstrating the 34.8" size, not the exact look of the bag.

I maintain that at that size, the bag wouldn't be all that difficult to fool someone who thinks it contained curtain rods, and another who saw Oswald only out of the corner of his eye... especially wearing a baggy-sleeved jacket, allowing for extra concealment.
« Last Edit: October 06, 2018, 08:35:46 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #222 on: October 06, 2018, 08:42:42 AM »
Really, Bill?

Show us where they did.

Seems Randle stated the size was 3ft long, given that Bookout didn't say anything about her physically indicating the size of the bag.
« Last Edit: October 06, 2018, 08:47:45 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #222 on: October 06, 2018, 08:42:42 AM »


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7407
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #223 on: October 06, 2018, 09:17:43 AM »

Seems Randle stated the size was 3ft long, given that Bookout didn't say anything about her physically indicating the size of the bag.


No. It seems that Bookhout wrote in his FD 302 that Randle had stated that. There is a difference!