Buell Wesley Frazier

[John Mytton]

Lame.
He would know well enough Blakeley(sic) was talking about HIS bullet by any reference that was given

OK, let's assume that Blakey was talking about the Walker bullet and they showed the already well established CE 573, and Walker remembered another bullet, what would Walker complain about and how would he structure his letter to get his point across??

1) CE 573 is already mutilated so why would an angry Walker complain about that? Wouldn't he elaborate and say, my bullet was more/less mutilated?
2) If Walker remembered a steel FMJ, why wasn't this mentioned, because that is the biggest differentiator and would surely get attention.
3) Why even mention an "unfired bullet", how does that help Walker's argument?

Therefore my original analysis is the only logical explanation, Blakey showed CE 399 and narcissistic Walker thought it was his bullet.



JohnM

[Michael Capasse]

OK, let's assume that Blakey was talking about the Walker bullet and they showed the already well established CE 573, and Walker remembered another bullet, what would Walker complain about and how would he structure his letter to get his point across??

1) CE 573 is already mutilated so why would an angry Walker complain about that? Wouldn't he elaborate and say, my bullet was more/less mutilated?
2) If Walker remembered a steel FMJ, why wasn't this mentioned, because that is the biggest differentiator and would surely get attention.
3) Why even mention an "unfired bullet", how does that help Walker's argument?

Therefore my original analysis is the only logical explanation, Blakey showed CE 399 and narcissistic Walker thought it was his bullet.
JohnM

While watching, why does Walker care about any other bullet but his own?
I know, I would make sure they were talking about MY bullet or not.

[John Mytton]

While watching, why does Walker care about any other bullet but his own?
I know, I would make sure they were talking about MY bullet or not.

Just answer 1 question, why would Walker compare his mutilated bullet to an "unfired bullet"?

JohnM

[Michael Capasse]

Just answer 1 question, why would Walker compare his mutilated bullet to an "unfired bullet"?

JohnM

CE 573 doesn't look like a bullet unfired or otherwise, much less the bullet that came out of my wall.
He doesn't care about any other bullet, and will make sure they are talking about his or not.
You're just making it up as you go

[Richard Smith]

So many words but again no responses.

I kept it to a minimum so even you should be able to follow along; what responses are you missing?

Again, can you tells us what Marina lied about?

Unknown to me, but I doubt that Norman would come forward with that claim without something to back it up. Are you losing confidence in the WC?

And it's not a logical inference that someone who buys a rifle will use it to shoot?   

It would require someone to be in possession of matching ammo.

HA HA HA HA. 

Is that some kind of argument?

Can you tell us what someone would do with a rifle?

Um, not without asking. WTF are you rambling about?

It appears to have a singular purpose,

Appears. Who cares what it appears to you?

but do you think Oswald intended to so something other than fire it like using it as a hockey stick to gain entry into the NHL?

I already answered that question, which is further supported by the fact that he didn't buy ammo, although Klein's had a package deal including a clip and ammo.

It's embarrassing to see the lengths that you will go to avoid admitting the obvious.

Tsk-tsk, all your wild speculation has been taken care of.

More words.   Let me try again. 

1)  Give us an example of Marina lying.  If you have none, just admit that. To my knowledge the only possible known instances of Marina "lying" involve her trying to protect Oswald rather than incriminate him.  I assume that is the source of frustration being expressed in the source that you cite.  You would seemingly agree with that conclusion since I assume you believe the authorities were trying to frame Oswald.  In which case, they would be supportive instead of critical of any lies Marina might tell to incriminate Oswald.

2)  Tell us what someone would do with a rifle other than use it to shoot at something (e.g. practice). 

3)  Provide your evidence to prove that Oswald never bought ammo for the rifle from any of the large number of gun stores in the Dallas area.   Are you saying the only source of such ammo was from Klein's?

[John Mytton]

CE 573 doesn't look like a bullet unfired or otherwise, much less the bullet that came out of my wall.
He doesn't care about any other bullet, and will make sure they are talking about his or not.
You're just making it up as you go

CE 573 doesn't look like a bullet unfired...

Exactly. Walker differentiates his mutilated bullet with the one he says he saw on TV, an "unfired bullet", therefore Walker wasn't looking at CE 573 but one that appeared to be "pristine". Hint CE 399.

much less the bullet that came out of my wall.

For the reasons I outlined above, if Walker saw CE 573 he would say how his bullet was different to CE 573, but Walker did make a comparison, he compared his bullet to an "unfired bullet" Hint CE 399

He doesn't care about any other bullet,

Precisely

and will make sure they are talking about his or not.

Yes, Walker was under the impression that the "unfired bullet" he saw on TV was his bullet, hence his aggravation.

You're just making it up as you go

My argument hasn't deviated since I started.

JohnM

[Michael Capasse]

These documents from the Weisberg collection raise serious doubts that the Carcano was the rifle used in the Walker shooting.
http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/W%20Disk/Walker%20Shooting/Item%2005.pdf

A streel jacket bullet was recorded multiple times.
Evidence against Oswald continues to fail.