Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Buell Wesley Frazier  (Read 17058 times)

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 983
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #280 on: October 11, 2018, 10:32:33 AM »
There is no verbatim record of what Oswald said!
>>>He said the bag he was carrying contained his lunch. Buell says different. You can't have it both ways. Either Buell or Oswald lied about that. Again, who do you think was lying about curtain rods: Buell or Oswald?

Why would that raise eyebrows for an investigator?
>>> Did I say would, or could? You need to stop misrepresenting what I said.

No, I didn't ignore that at all. A 19 year old kid who knows he hasn't done anything wrong, has no reason to lie to police.
>>> This particular 19yo 'kid' was sharp enough to recognize a fist being raised by an apparently irate officer who seemed intent on getting Buell's signature on a confession.

An innocent indivual doesn't usually lie to try and get out of trouble
>>> An innocent individual who is physically threatened by police?

Besides, if he was going to lie, why not tell investigators what they wanted to hear; i.e. that the bag they had was indeed the bag he saw Oswald carry?
>>> It would be folly to admit that. He would then have to explain why he never considered the package seemed big enough to carry a broken down rifle, on a day when the POTUS would be driving right past their workplace.

I disagree. The move would have been just as stupid as you standing by that point!
>>> So because you disagree with me I'm stupid, huh. You must have all the answers. Can't wait for your press conference.

He said the bag he was carrying contained his lunch.

Did you hear Oswald say that? Since there is no verbatim record of what Oswald said, you must have heard him say that yourself, right?

Did I say would, or could? You need to stop misrepresenting what I said.

There was no misrepresentation. You said; "That oft-repeated statement alone could raise investigator eyebrows" and I asked you why it would. In other words, I was asking you why you feel it "could raise investigator eyebrows" It is not my problem if you don't comprehend what is written.

But let's see if you understand this; by saying "could raise" you implicitely leave the possibility open that it could also be "couldn't raise", which in turn makes your entire argument completely invalid and useless.

This particular 19yo 'kid' was sharp enough to recognize a fist being raised by an apparently irate officer who seemed intent on getting Buell's signature on a confession.

First of all, as far as I can recall, nowhere in Frazier's story is there a fist being raised, so I have no idea where you got that bit of information from. Secondly, Frazier claims that when Fritz presented him with a written confession for him to sign, he stood up to Fritz and said "no", which clearly shows he was not letting Fritz intimidate him.

And yet you basically say that Frazier would have felt intimidated and that's why he lied and told them what they did not want to hear?  BS: Do you see the flaw in this "logic"?

It would be folly to admit that. He would then have to explain why he never considered the package seemed big enough to carry a broken down rifle, on a day when the POTUS would be driving right past their workplace.

This is just plain stupid. You've got two guys driving to work on a regular basis and just because the President comes to town, one of those guys is supposed to suspect the other of carrying a concealed weapon for the purpose of killing Kennedy? Are you for real?

So because you disagree with me I'm stupid, huh.

Nope. Where did I say that? Do you have a comprehension problem? The fact that I disagree with you has nothing to do with you being stupid. Your argument being stupid has to do with your argument being stupid.
« Last Edit: October 11, 2018, 12:29:27 PM by Martin Weidmann »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #280 on: October 11, 2018, 10:32:33 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3236
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #281 on: October 11, 2018, 04:48:40 PM »
Just because their alleged accounts differ, that doesn't necessarily mean that one of them is lying.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 914
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #282 on: October 12, 2018, 01:09:41 AM »
Blah Blah
Why suck up a bunch of web space quoting the affidavit that the police wrote?
I provided the link and we've all read it.
Now it is/or is it? obvious that BWF was grilled before Fritz [according to his notes] asked Oswald about curtain rods...
I can't find a better photo of RATher holding the curtain rods----

Again---
Quote
Mr. BALL - Did he come in with anybody?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - No.
Mr. BALL - He was alone?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Yes; he was alone.
Mr. BALL - Do you recall him having anything in his hand?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Well, I didn't see anything, if he did.
Mr. BALL - Did you pay enough attention to him, you think, that you would remember whether he did or didn't?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Well, I believe I can---yes, sir---I'll put it this way; I didn't see anything in his hands at the time.
Mr. BALL - In other words, your memory is definite on that is it?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL - In other words, you would say positively he had nothing in his hands?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - I would say that---yes, sir.
In other words, there was no package ;)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1314
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #283 on: October 14, 2018, 05:10:02 AM »
Why suck up a bunch of web space quoting the affidavit that the police wrote?
I provided the link and we've all read it.
Now it is/or is it? obvious that BWF was grilled before Fritz [according to his notes] asked Oswald about curtain rods...
I can't find a better photo of RATher holding the curtain rods----

Again--- In other words, there was no package ;)

Tell us why Rather showing that the 34.8" bag cannot be held in the palm and under the armpit is the only aspect of the Rather bag demo you seem interested in.
« Last Edit: October 14, 2018, 05:29:50 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1314
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #284 on: October 14, 2018, 05:12:26 AM »
Just because their alleged accounts differ, that doesn't necessarily mean that one of them is lying.

Yes it does

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #284 on: October 14, 2018, 05:12:26 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1314
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #285 on: October 14, 2018, 05:25:46 AM »

First of all, as far as I can recall, nowhere in Frazier's story is there a fist being raised, so I have no idea where you got that bit of information from.

Buell Wesley Frazier and his interrogation by Will Fritz


« Last Edit: October 14, 2018, 09:44:33 PM by Bill Chapman »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 983
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #286 on: October 14, 2018, 02:19:16 PM »
Buell Wesley Frazier and his interrogation by Will Fritz


Hang on a minute. You claimed;


People say a lot of things. Especially a person who drove the eventual prime suspect to the eventual murder scene. And was the person who apparently underwent a lengthy interrogation in which he was threatened with fisticuffs unless he 'fessed up.


The video shows that Fritz presented Frazier with a written confession to sign early on and got angry when Frazier stood up to him and refused to sign it.

Only after Fritz left (and Frazier said he never saw him again) was Frazier being interrogated for hours!

What I don't understand and you likely can not explain is why would Frazier feel so intimidated during the later interrogation that he lied about the bag, when he had already shown no sign of being intimidated by Fritz?

Online Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1673
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #287 on: October 14, 2018, 07:10:09 PM »
Hang on a minute. You claimed;

The video shows that Fritz presented Frazier with a written confession to sign early on and got angry when Frazier stood up to him and refused to sign it.

Only after Fritz left (and Frazier said he never saw him again) was Frazier being interrogated for hours!

What I don't understand and you likely can not explain is why would Frazier feel so intimidated during the later interrogation that he lied about the bag, when he had already shown no sign of being intimidated by Fritz?

The video shows that Fritz presented Frazier with a written confession to sign early on and got angry when Frazier stood up to him and refused to sign it.


Yes, that's right.... Unfortunately Frazier's later statement cast a pall over his veracity.....I'm referring to Frazier saying " they would have a "hell of a fight" if Fritz struck him....  That's pure unadulterated Bull stuff.....

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #287 on: October 14, 2018, 07:10:09 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1314
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #288 on: October 14, 2018, 09:42:53 PM »


Quote from: Martin Weidmann on October 11, 2018, 03:32:33 PM

First of all, as far as I can recall, nowhere in Frazier's story is there a fist being raised, so I have no idea where you got that bit of information from.


WELL?

« Last Edit: October 15, 2018, 01:06:16 AM by Bill Chapman »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 983
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #289 on: October 14, 2018, 10:08:56 PM »
Quote from: Martin Weidmann on October 11, 2018, 03:32:33 PM

First of all, as far as I can recall, nowhere in Frazier's story is there a fist being raised, so I have no idea where you got that bit of information from.


WELL?


Well nothing, Now I recall.

How about you addressing the points I have raised?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #289 on: October 14, 2018, 10:08:56 PM »


Support The Forum - Make A Small Donation