Video: Dan Rather and Gerald Posner analyze the shots that killed JFK

[Jarrett Smith]

       I give you the gold standard Trask and Stolley. Yet, you insist on sticking with Dan Rather? This in the face of Rather being rewarded with Cronkite's CBS News Anchor chair? Which is right in line with the Current News Media now admitting to promoting Phony Polling? What's it take to open your eyes?   

Take notice Posner pointed at the top of his back not where the actual entry was. Plus, they ignored the brain material blowing towards the left rear that hit Hargis. Typical Posner nothing but an Bahookie kissing shill.

[Tom Graves]

Take notice Posner pointed at the top of his back not where the actual entry was. Plus, they ignored the brain material blowing towards the left rear that hit Hargis. Typical Posner nothing but a Bahookie kissing shill.

I guess you missed the frames where JFK's brains and blood are being propelled forward, as are at least two skull fragments.

PS The only thing Posner got wrong in Case Closed was befriending false-defector-in-place in Geneva in June 1962 / false (or perhaps rogue) physical defector to the U.S. in February 1964 -- Yuri "The KGB Had Absolutely Nothing To Do With Former U-2 Radar Operator Oswald During The Two-And-A-Half Years He Lived In The USSR" Nosenko because he was telling him exactly what he (as had a very grateful J. Edgar Hoover!) wanted to hear.

LOL!

[John Corbett]

Take notice Posner pointed at the top of his back not where the actual entry was. Plus, they ignored the brain material blowing towards the left rear that hit Hargis. Typical Posner nothing but an Bahookie kissing shill.

The brain matter did not blow back toward Hargis. It blew forward and upward and Hargis drove through that cloud. Frame Z313 clearly shows the splatter is forward and upward from the upper right side of JFK's head which had just exploded.

[Steve M. Galbraith]

Take notice Posner pointed at the top of his back not where the actual entry was. Plus, they ignored the brain material blowing towards the left rear that hit Hargis. Typical Posner nothing but an Bahookie kissing shill.

Hargis explained the brain/blood matter/material striking him below.

Question: You were sprayed with matter, and you were behind the limousine, and yet you say you initially ran to the Book Depository because of the suggestion of the direction of the shot.
Hargis: Right.
Question: But the actual - the fact that you were behind the car suggests that the shot in fact came from the front and right of the car.
Hargis: Well, that right there is what I've wondered about all along, but see there's ah -- you've got to take into consideration we were moving at the time, and when he got hit all that stuff went like this, and of course I run through it.

And

Question: Left shoulder. Could you see what part of his head got hit?
Hargis: No I couldn't see what part of it got hit.
Oser: Would you say that he was hit in the rear of the head, the side of the head, or the front of his head?
Hargis: If he'd got hit in the rear, I'd of been able to see it. All I saw was just a splash come out on the other side.

So he says he "run through" the blood/brain matter and that he didn't see a "hit" in the back of JFK's head but a "splash" on the side. If it blew out the back of JFK's head I would think he would have seen that? And he wouldn't have "run through" the matter; it would have blown into his windshield/face?

He's not a good witness for a rear exit wound. Could he have been wrong? Of course. That's why they had an autopsy.

Link/source: https://www.jfk-assassination.net/hargis.htm

And James Chaney, the motorcycle officer right next to JFK (below right), said all of the shots came from behind him, from the rear.

"Chaney said he was positive that all the noises he heard were coming from behind his motorcycle and none of these noises came from the side or the front of the position in which Chaney was located. Chaney said the noises were fairly evenly spaced."

https://www.maryferrell.org/xdoc/9965#relPageId=12&search=Chaney

Here's the Moorman photo with Hargis on the near left and Chaney on the farther right.

[Royell Storing]

Here is Hargis on the brain/blood matter/material:

Question: You were sprayed with matter, and you were behind the limousine, and yet you say you initially ran to the Book Depository because of the suggestion of the direction of the shot.
Hargis: Right.
Question: But the actual - the fact that you were behind the car suggests that the shot in fact came from the front and right of the car.
Hargis: Well, that right there is what I've wondered about all along, but see there's ah -- you've got to take into consideration we were moving at the time, and when he got hit all that stuff went like this, and of course I run through it.

And

Question: Left shoulder. Could you see what part of his head got hit?
Hargis: No I couldn't see what part of it got hit.
Oser: Would you say that he was hit in the rear of the head, the side of the head, or the front of his head?
Hargis: If he'd got hit in the rear, I'd of been able to see it. All I saw was just a splash come out on the other side.

So he says he "run through" the blood/brain matter and that he didn't see a "hit" in the back of JFK's head but a "splash" on the side. If it blew out the back of JFK's head I would think he would have seen that? And he wouldn't have "run through" the matter; it would have blown into his windshield/face?

He's not a good witness for a rear exit wound. Could he have been wrong? Of course. That's why they had an autopsy.

Link/source: https://www.jfk-assassination.net/hargis.htm

And James Chaney, the motorcycle officer right next to JFK (below right), said all of the shots came from behind him, from the rear.

"Chaney said he was positive that all the noises he heard were coming from behind his motorcycle and none of these noises came from the side or the front of the position in which Chaney was located. Chaney said the noises were fairly evenly spaced."

https://www.maryferrell.org/xdoc/9965#relPageId=12&search=Chaney

   Non of the above is sworn testimony. It carries No Weight what-so-ever. Mary Farrell, Mary Todd Lincoln, Mary, Mary, Quite Contrary. Doesn't matter unless the quoted source is looking at Perjury for whatever he/she is saying. This includes Fauci.