Determining a Timestamp for Darnell

[Royell Storing]

You make sh!t up and believe it's a fact.
You are an incredibly tiring person to deal with.
Why not post an actual fact you can back up. It's all your fantastical opinion. Your constant insistence that Weigman can be seen running across the knoll in the Bell footage DQ's you from this discussion.

    You're frustrated because I refer to Facts that You are Not familiar with. Remember, I had to tell you which figure was Wiegman on the Bell Film.
    Again, you're very good with the Prayer Man stuff. But when we move away from that, you get lost due to your limited knowledge. You need to bone up on the Assassination Films, the 11/22/63 layout of the Knoll, and the position of those on the knoll relative to each other and the Knoll landmarks. Such as the Z Perch, Stemmons Sign, Street Light Pole, & Thornton Sign. 
    And, from the point we see Wiegman on the Bell Film, he had to move (W) across the knoll in order to arrive (W) of the street light pole where he filmed the Newman Family.   

[Dan O'meara]

     I said "CLEARER" Darnell Film frames. You have only posted the 1st frame. There are "CLEARER" frames than the 1st frame. If for whatever reason you have Not been able to examine frames other than the 1st frame, just say so.
     If you believe that Wiegman is Not moving across the Knoll on the Bell Film,  just how long do you believe he stood stock still there on the Knoll? Remember that Wiegman standing still impacts the TICK/TOCK of his film footage afterward. Like his filming Officer Haygood coming down Elm Street. Changing the Haygood timeline further calls into question his 5 minute window.

You are literally unbelievable.
I have posted a frame (which is not the first frame of the Darnell footage) that clearly shows the Thornton sign.
Everyone can see it.
It's crystal clear.
I would like to see you post a clearer frame...but you can't...you're too old to understand how the technology works that would allow you to post a frame...that's why you never post any images.

If you believe that Wiegman is Not moving across the Knoll on the Bell Film,

You need to really focus here.
Don't just assume anything.
OK...here goes...
WEIGMAN DOES NOT MOVE ACROSS THE KNOLL.
He does not move one centimetre across the knoll in the Bell footage.
It does not happen.
It's not a question of belief.
It simply does not happen.
That is a fact.
WEIGMAN DOES NOT MOVE ONE CENTIMETRE ACROSS THE KNOLL IN THE BELL FILM.

That is literally the end of that discussion as far as I'm concerned. It does not happen.
That you keep insisting it does is so weird I don't know what to think.
You clearly have mental health issues.
Or...you are so old you have nom idea what's real and what's just in your mind.

[Royell Storing]

 All you have to do is look at the clearer Darnell Film frames after that 1st frame.



Like this frame.
Like this frame that clearly shows, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that the Thornton sign is covering where Zapruder and Sitzman are?
Does it matter that I've shown you this frame?
Does it make any difference?

Use your eyes and a tiny portion of your brain.
Use intelligence.

Once again, for the third time, we have your claim that Weigman can be seen moving across the knoll. This is a lie. This is a deliberate falsehood. Why are you lying about this? Time and time again I have to show that you are lying about this but you carry on saying it.
Unfortunately, it appears you are a pathological liar and fantasist.
It really is a shame..

     You do see the Z Perch on this still frame, correct? We are seeing several feet to the (R) of the pedestal. There is No Sitzman, and No Zapruder. And at this point, Wiegman is running DOWN the knoll.

[Dan O'meara]

    You're frustrated because I refer to Facts that You are Not familiar with. Remember, I had to tell you which figure was Wiegman on the Bell Film.
    Again, you're very good with the Prayer Man stuff. But when we move away from that, you get lost due to your limited knowledge. You need to bone up on the Assassination Films, the 11/22/63 layout of the Knoll, and the position of those on the knoll relative to each other and the Knoll landmarks. Such as the Z Perch, Stemmons Sign, Street Light Pole, & Thornton Sign. 
    And, from the point we see Wiegman on the Bell Film, he had to move (W) across the knoll in order to arrive (W) of the street light pole where he filmed the Newman Family.

Remember, I had to tell you which figure was Wiegman on the Bell Film.

This is a lie.
You have now moved into new territory.
I thought you were just a doddering old fool but this is a little more sinister.
You name the post where you showed me who Weigman was.
I'm not going to let this go Royell because you really have crossed a line.

List the number of the REPLY in this thread where you told me who Weigman was in the Bell footage.

[Royell Storing]

You are literally unbelievable.
I have posted a frame (which is not the first frame of the Darnell footage) that clearly shows the Thornton sign.
Everyone can see it.
It's crystal clear.
I would like to see you post a clearer frame...but you can't...you're too old to understand how the technology works that would allow you to post a frame...that's why you never post any images.

If you believe that Wiegman is Not moving across the Knoll on the Bell Film,

You need to really focus here.
Don't just assume anything.
OK...here goes...
WEIGMAN DOES NOT MOVE ACROSS THE KNOLL.
He does not move one centimetre across the knoll in the Bell footage.
It does not happen.
It's not a question of belief.
It simply does not happen.
That is a fact.
WEIGMAN DOES NOT MOVE ONE CENTIMETRE ACROSS THE KNOLL IN THE BELL FILM.

That is literally the end of that discussion as far as I'm concerned. It does not happen.
That you keep insisting it does is so weird I don't know what to think.
You clearly have mental health issues.
Or...you are so old you have nom idea what's real and what's just in your mind.

      Again, if you want to have Wiegman standing stock still and filming nothing, you are expanding his timeline. Not to mention after filming the Hester's, why would he just stand stock still? And exactly who other than Groucho Marx "stands" like we see Wiegman doing on the Bell Film?

[Dan O'meara]

     You do see the Z Perch on this still frame, correct? We are seeing several feet to the (R) of the pedestal. There is No Sitzman, and No Zapruder. And at this point, Wiegman is running DOWN the knoll.

More lies.
This is not the part of Darnell where Weigman is running down the hill.
This is the opening of Darnell. The guy in the hat is stood outside the vehicle. The camera then pans across to the front steps of the TSBD building where we see Baker running towards the steps. After this the camera pans back towards this vehicle but the man in the hat has now re-entered the vehicle. It is at this point we see Weigman running down the knoll.

I don't understand why you have decided to start constantly lying. It's really weird.
Are you confused or are you lying?

[Dan O'meara]

      Again, if you want to have Wiegman standing stock still and filming nothing, you are expanding his timeline. Not to mention after filming the Hester's, why would he just stand stock still? And exactly who other than Groucho Marx "stands" like we see Wiegman doing on the Bell Film?

In the Bell footage we do not see Weigman running or moving anywhere.
You are a liar to keep insisting he does.
Post an image of Weigman running in the Bell film.
You won't be able to.
Your constant lying has really diminished my view of you.

And state the REPLY in this thread where you told me who the Weigman figure was.
You can't.
You're just a liar.