Author Topic: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?  (Read 12860 times)

0 Members and Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4396
  • Yuri Nosenko and his beautiful American wife
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #35 on: August 11, 2026, 12:13:25 AM »
Unfortunately, there are still CIA officials who apparently don't want all the JFKA files released... It is very possible there are agents out there - active or retired - tasked to keep the issues confused with a flood of "this or that," and "he said, she said," along with a boatload of ad hominems to keep the matter from being rationally discussed and settled...

Dear Jake "Mr. Magoo" Maxwell,

Have you always been paranoiac?

-- Tom

Online Brian Doyle

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 365
Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #36 on: August 11, 2026, 03:03:53 PM »
I hate to burst your bubble, [not really] but you haven't discovered anything of importance. Nothing you post here will ever see the light of day outside this forum. It's only make believe.


My discovery of our generation, of Sarah Stanton hearing Oswald say he was going to go back in to the 2nd Floor Lunch Room to eat lunch and not going down to watch the motorcade, was published in Vince Palamara's book around 2018 (Can't remember the title)...

Richard Gilbride also published this discovery in his book "JFK Inside Job"...

In my postings about the assassination on Deep Politics I mentioned the JFK Assassination being like the "Devil's Chessboard"...Shortly after Talbot came out with a book with the same title...

It is pathetic that the reason this discovery is not being accepted and promoted by the JFK research community is so they can cater to the punk researcher Bart Kamp and flatter the ego of Jim DiEugenio - while maintaining the clique's pecking order for whom the replies are now closed...

« Last Edit: August 11, 2026, 03:41:22 PM by Brian Doyle »

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2710
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #37 on: August 11, 2026, 03:34:23 PM »

My discovery of our generation, of Sarah Stanton hearing Oswald say he was going to go back in to the 2nd Floor Lunch Room to eat lunch and not going down to watch the motorcade, was published in Vince Palamara's book around 2018 (Can't remember the title)...

Richard Gilbride also published this discovery in his book "JFK Inside Job"...

In my postings about the assassination on Deep Politics I mentioned the JFK Assassination being like the "Devil's Chessboard"...Shortly after Talbot came out with a book with the same title...

It is pathetic that the reason this discovery is not being accepted and promoted by the JFK research community is so they can cater to the punk researcher Bart Kamp and flatter the ego of Jim DiEugenio - while maintaining the clique's pecking order for whom the replies are now closed...

I don't doubt you can find disciples within the kook-sphere. You are preaching to the choir. Nobody outside that realm is ever going to take you seriously. Why the hell would they?

Online Brian Doyle

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 365
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #38 on: August 11, 2026, 03:47:55 PM »
I don't doubt you can find disciples within the kook-sphere. You are preaching to the choir. Nobody outside that realm is ever going to take you seriously. Why the hell would they?

Because I left David Von Pein unable to answer why the authorities allowed Lovelady to not answer why he never told the original 1963 investigation he saw Oswald leave through the front door?...The HSCA stayed miles away from that lest they provoke investigation in to it that asked why the authorities avoided identifying the cop who stopped Oswald in the Lobby...You can tell when you've scored good points when the opposition changes the subject from the material and the evidence to yourself and reduces the thread to name-calling...

When Bart Kamp was let back on The Education Forum he did not open with his claim to fame the Prayer Man theory...If the Prayer Man theory were valid it would break the back of the Warren Commission and solve the assassination...So you would think the researcher whose name was connected to it the most would stand behind such an important discovery on his return to the forum...The reason Kamp posted Oswald In Finland as his return to The Education Forum is because he doesn't believe in the Prayer Man theory...He knows I've proven it is BS...This is what the clique does...Under "Replies are closed to further comments" Andrew Iler the membership stays quiet and helps Kamp along with his shedding of the Prayer Man snake skin and using Oswald In Finland as a distraction from Kamp's now infamous self-destruction with a garbage theory...Kamp has the personal servants Iler and DiEugenio to help him along and the membership stays quiet lest it also be punished for challenging these site-dominating bullies...This is how they roll...They quietly drop their embarrassing bogus theory while keeping the vicious censorship and banning of the guy who disproved it...They have warm memories of James Gordon and his intellectual assassination of those who disproved them...

Online David Von Pein

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 659
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #39 on: August 11, 2026, 04:18:13 PM »
...the authorities avoided identifying the cop who stopped Oswald in the Lobby...

They "avoided" it because they knew it never happened. No cop ever "stopped Oswald in the Lobby" of the Depository. Oswald was stopped only one time in the TSBD by a policeman on 11/22, and that was by Marrion Baker, of course, and that occurred in the second-floor lunchroom. That fact was verified for all time by Roy Truly (and by Baker too).

More here:
https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2019/02/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-1308.html#DMN-11-23-63
« Last Edit: August 11, 2026, 04:20:48 PM by David Von Pein »

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2710
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #40 on: August 11, 2026, 07:08:51 PM »
Because I left David Von Pein unable to answer why the authorities allowed Lovelady to not answer why he never told the original 1963 investigation he saw Oswald leave through the front door?...The HSCA stayed miles away from that lest they provoke investigation in to it that asked why the authorities avoided identifying the cop who stopped Oswald in the Lobby...You can tell when you've scored good points when the opposition changes the subject from the material and the evidence to yourself and reduces the thread to name-calling...

Why would they bother having Lovelady testify to something that was already known. Robert McNeil and an AP report whose name I can't remember off hand both encountered Oswald as they entered the building to find a phone.
Quote

When Bart Kamp was let back on The Education Forum he did not open with his claim to fame the Prayer Man theory...If the Prayer Man theory were valid it would break the back of the Warren Commission and solve the assassination...So you would think the researcher whose name was connected to it the most would stand behind such an important discovery on his return to the forum...The reason Kamp posted Oswald In Finland as his return to The Education Forum is because he doesn't believe in the Prayer Man theory...He knows I've proven it is BS...This is what the clique does...Under "Replies are closed to further comments" Andrew Iler the membership stays quiet and helps Kamp along with his shedding of the Prayer Man snake skin and using Oswald In Finland as a distraction from Kamp's now infamous self-destruction with a garbage theory...Kamp has the personal servants Iler and DiEugenio to help him along and the membership stays quiet lest it also be punished for challenging these site-dominating bullies...This is how they roll...They quietly drop their embarrassing bogus theory while keeping the vicious censorship and banning of the guy who disproved it...They have warm memories of James Gordon and his intellectual assassination of those who disproved them...

i don't know, nor do I care, who Prayer Man was. He/she had nothing to do with the assassination. Nobody who watched the motorcade from in front of the TSBD had any involvement. The only thing that puzzles me is why anybody else cares.

Offline Jake Maxwell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 814
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #41 on: August 11, 2026, 08:03:56 PM »
Dear Jake "Mr. Magoo" Maxwell,

Have you always been paranoiac?

-- Tom

You might be proving my point here....