At least 1 of the actual Dan Rather CBS broadcasts done that weekend is posted on You Tube. This is no secret.
Ok that's great. If we can get the youtube link in here to bolster CIA employee Dino Brugioni's testimony that the film has been tampered with then this supports that fact.
So where do we stand at the moment?
We have arguments in the thread concerning where heads were facing on a film which CIA operative Dino Brugioni who worked on it on November 24th 1963 says is not admissible because it has been tampered with.
Now, Dino Brugioni testified that the fatal head shot has a lot of frames missing and that the spread of brain matter was much more on the original and he says the original was a much clearer copy. If there are frames missing and the spread of brain matter has been altered I think its safe to say not only are there frames missing, its safe to say the film has undergone editing of the frames.
If this is the case, not one single frame of the film is admissible no matter where you go in the sequence from the first until last frame.