Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Steve Smith

Author Topic: Why Altgens 6 Refutes the Lone-Gunman Theory  (Read 8059 times)

Online Brian Doyle

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Why Altgens 6 Refutes the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #70 on: Today at 04:54:04 PM »
Just what evidence would that be that establishes Oswald was in the 2nd floor lunchroom during the assassination?

Literally ALL the evidence...

Every single witness to Oswald's whereabouts puts him in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room...Truly & Baker, new witness Sarah Stanton, Dougherty, Carolyn Arnold, Oswald himself, Buell Frazier (who said Oswald's partly-eaten cheese sandwich and apple were seen on the 2nd Floor Lunch Room table), and James Hosty who said Oswald admitted he was alone in the Lunch Room during the assassination...

There are no witnesses to Oswald being outside on the front steps top platform during the assassination...Frazier said Oswald wasn't there...Yet the dysfunctional CT community keeps insisting Oswald was there out front in order to indulge lunatic fringe researchers and their pet theories...

JFK Assassination Forum

Why Altgens 6 Refutes the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #70 on: Today at 04:54:04 PM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5490
Re: Why Altgens 6 Refutes the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #71 on: Today at 05:05:46 PM »
Because under The Education Forum and Jim DiEugenio the CT community has taken a serious wrong turn and ran the credibility of JFK research on to the rocks via Greg Parker and Bart Kamp...This single issue and the corruption around it has railroaded and paralyzed good JFK research and made the JFK internet a trench warfare battle zone of no progress and confusion...It isn't the Lone Nutters who are doing this it is that idiot Jim DiEugenio and his tendency towards generating gangs and cliques of favorites over good research...Jim is in it for the ego satisfaction and he has a whole internet of sycophants that take that bargain and help him along with it...That group just succeeded in putting a prime DiEugenio ass-kisser, Andrew Iler, in dictatorial control of The Education Forum and its "Moderator Team" (All DiEugenio suck-ups)...

The reason it is an issue is because the good evidence DiEugenio has helped railroad out of view with his corrupted methods is clearly establishing that Oswald was in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room during the assassination...The Education Forum makes itself the welcomed home of unlimited bullsh*t that fills its annals with years of detailed fodder yet carefully stays away from the important necessary conclusions this evidence leads to...And they do it under the implied premise that they are the ultimate researchers with the best methods - all kept safe by wicked censorship and banning controlled by a core group of favored members (The Moderator Team)...They have the balls to suggest this assumption of superior status to the degree of giving instruction on how to put people on ignore...The whole time protecting the bogus Prayer Man theory with some of the worst corruption and dishonesty in research history and allowing no counter evidence...All headed off by false accusations of rules violations...

Why is it an issue?...Because the Prayer Man subject has successfully prevented a solving of the conspiracy single handedly...And it has been done by a creep researcher, Bart Kamp, who is protected from fair playing field adversarial debate by a group of dominating hacks, bullies, frauds, and suck ups who see the Prayer Man theory as a short route to insider status in the research community...

  So you were rejected. So what? This Forum does Not carry crying towels. 

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1853
Re: Why Altgens 6 Refutes the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #72 on: Today at 05:30:45 PM »
Literally ALL the evidence...

WOW. You've really zeroed in on it.
Quote

Every single witness to Oswald's whereabouts puts him in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room

Just who might that be?
Quote

...Truly & Baker, new witness

Baker was on his motorcycle on Houston St. when the shots were fired. Truly was watching the motorcade from in front of the TSBD. They would have needed x-ray vision to see Oswald in the lunchroom. Try again.
Quote


Sarah Stanton, Dougherty, Carolyn Arnold,

Are you saying these people saw Oswald in the lunchroom when the shots were fired.
Quote


Oswald himself

Well I guess that settles it. Oswald said he was in the lunchroom when the shots were fired? Why would we doubt his word about that?
Quote

Buell Frazier (who said Oswald's partly-eaten cheese sandwich and apple were seen on the 2nd Floor Lunch Room table),

Did Frazier see Oswald at the table with his cheese sandwich and apple?
Quote


James Hosty who said Oswald admitted he was alone in the Lunch Room during the assassination...

And of course, we have no reason to doubt that. <chuckle>
Quote

There are no witnesses to Oswald being outside on the front steps top platform during the assassination...Frazier said Oswald wasn't there...Yet the dysfunctional CT community keeps insisting Oswald was there out front in order to indulge lunatic fringe researchers and their pet theories...

You are correct. No witness said Oswald was on the front steps during the shooting and no witness saw Oswald in the second floor lunch room during the shooting. No one provides Oswald with an alibi. From my perspective, the people who claim Oswald was on the front steps during the shooting are no more or less loony than those who insist he was in the second-floor lunchroom during the shooting.

The only witness who said he saw Oswald during the shooting was Howard Brennan. He said Oswald was in the 6th floor sniper's nest firing the rifle. He is corroborated by Oswald's fingerprints on the boxes in the sniper's nest, his palm print on the murder weapon, his shirt fibers on the butt plate of the rifle, and his palm print on the bag that contained fibers matching the blanket Oswald used to store his rifle. There's also a paper trail establishing Oswald ordered the murder weapon from Klein's and pictures of him holding the rifle. I guess all that is no reason to believe Oswald was the assassin.

As for all the other people you mentioned, not one of them saw Oswald in the lunch room when the shots were fired and thus do not establish his presence there when the shots were fired.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Why Altgens 6 Refutes the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #72 on: Today at 05:30:45 PM »