When Was JFK Hit?

[Dan O'meara]

How does one "completely discredit" a professional photographic panel's analysis of the same film that everyone is still looking at today? John Orr doesn't seem to think it's been "completely discredited." Or are you in John C mode, whereby anything that doesn't fit your preferred narrative has been "completely discredited"?

It's incredibly easy to "completely discredit" a professional photographic panels analysis.
You simply look at the evidence yourself. It's called research.
Rather than just swallow down every lie you are spoon-fed, it would serve you better to actually look for yourself.
The HSCA panel stated that JFK's "head moves rapidly from right to his left in the direction of his wife" by z207. This is the main part of their argument for a reaction before JFK passes behind the Stemmons sign.
It is easily disprovable:

Look at the hairline of JFK in the following frames:



In the top pic (z207, just before he passes behind Stemmons sign) the parting in his hair on the left side of his head is clearly visible.
In the second pic (z225, first full frame of JFK emerging from behind Stemmons) his parting is not so visible but the sweep of his hair up to it is.
In the bottom pic (z230, JFK facing straight ahead) the part of his forehead revealed by the sweep of his hairline up to the parting is no longer visible.
Far from turning to his left, JFK is still looking to his right as he passes behind the Stemmons sign (z207).
There is no head-snap to the left and, therefore, no reason to suspect JFK is reacting to anything.

Here is the photographic evidence disproving the HSCA's assertions.
Will you accept what you see with your own eyes?

I'm disappointed. I would have assumed you had memorized CE 1381 by now.

Gloria Calvery: "The car he was in was almost directly in front of where I was standing when I heard the first shot."

Karan Hicks: "The car he was in was almost directly in front of where I was standing when I heard the first explosion."

Karen Westbrook: "The car he was in was almost directly in front of where I was standing when I heard the first explosion."

Carol Reed: ""At the time President Kennedy was shot I was standing on the curb of Elm Street about mid-way between the Texas School Book Depository Building and the Elm Street Railroad overpass. I was with Mrs . Karen Hicks ... Miss Karen Westbrook ... and Mrs. Gloria Calvary ... at the time the President was shot."

Feeling enlightened, Grasshopper? I didn't think so.

I knew exactly who you were referring to which is why I made the point.
I knew they stated "almost directly in front".
ALMOST DIRECTLY IN FROINT.
Not - RIGHT IN FRONT, as you misremembered.
ALMOST DIRECTLY IN FRONT can, in no way, be thought of as RIGHT IN FRONT.
They are two completely different things. Two completely different positions.
Your truly sad attempt to pass them off as the same thing is yet another example of the dumbness that plagues your every post.

Are you feeling enlightened?
Are you beginning to see how wrong you constantly are?

[Zeon Mason]

I see Jackie turning her head quickly to look at JFK at that Z190 frame and that’s JFK with hand fully up and his head turned sharply. It’s this point where Harold Norman describes as hearing the shot WHEN he saw JFKs hand up so IDK for sure if he’s just been hit there. You would think some % of momentum transfer of the bullet would cause some instantaneous movement forward from Z190-Z207 but I’m really not seeing anything to indicate that. I think Andrew suggested because it’s such a short path thru the neck and throat of JFK and no bone struck that the bullet was in and out so quickly that there was no momentum transfer enough to move the mass of the body. Don’t know for certain because nobody’s done a really good experiment with total body replicas including the arms and legs and hands.

[Andrew Mason]

It's incredibly easy to "completely discredit" a professional photographic panels analysis.
You simply look at the evidence yourself. It's called research.
Rather than just swallow down every lie you are spoon-fed, it would serve you better to actually look for yourself.
The HSCA panel stated that JFK's "head moves rapidly from right to his left in the direction of his wife" by z207. This is the main part of their argument for a reaction before JFK passes behind the Stemmons sign.
…

Here is the photographic evidence disproving the HSCA's assertions.
Will you accept what you see with your own eyes?

What is the difference between z224 and z225 that convinces you that JFK is not reacting in z224 but is in z225?
What evidence is telling you that his contorted face in z225 is not part of his reaction?
 
As far as the position of the car as described by the withesses, you need to look at all the evidence. Almost directly in front suggests the car had not yet passed by where she was standing.  But you don’t neetd to guess. Look at other witnesses. At z225 the VP security car is well past the turn. JFK is no longer b
in Linda Willis’ sightline to the Stemmons sign.  The limo is well past the west edge of the TSBD(Greer).  And it is more than a second after Phil Willis’ photo taken at z202 just before the first shot.