The Brown Paper Bag

[Royell Storing]

Answers do indeed destroy narratives. That's why LNs don't answer critical questions.

In the past 20 years I have met only one LN who had the cojones to agree that certain claims in the WC reports were not supported by evidence and that certain parts of the narrative were extremely problematic. He died a few years ago but I still miss our open and honest discussions. Too bad there are not more LNs like him. Instead I'm dealing with a bunch of lying, dishonest weasels who are desperately trying to defend the indefensible.

   These LN's are stuck now. All they can do is make stuff up whenever they are forced into the jackpot. I got a card carrying LN now claiming Officer Haygood made 2 separate trips into the railroad yard. I got another claiming Amos Euins was Not loaded into Inspector Sawyer's car until 1:00 PM. Jam 'em up and they immediately rewrite 62+ yr old history on-the-spot. They rely on people Not knowing to begin with or having forgotten over the course of time. Not happening with some of us still ready to get in their grill. 

[Martin Weidmann]

   These LN's are stuck now. All they can do is make stuff up whenever they are forced into the jackpot. I got a card carrying LN now claiming Officer Haygood made 2 separate trips into the railroad yard. I got another claiming Amos Euins was Not loaded into Inspector Sawyer's car until 1:00 PM. Jam 'em up and they immediately rewrite 62+ yr old history on-the-spot. They rely on people Not knowing to begin with or having forgotten over the course of time. Not happening with some of us still ready to get in their grill.

They rely on people Not knowing to begin with or having forgotten over the course of time.

Royell, in other discussion I don't agree with you, but in this case you are absolutely right.

I have tried to figure out what would cause that level of determination to misrepresent and lie about evidence and make stuff up in a 6 decades old case the general public nowadays hasn't got a clue and doesn't give a damn about. One would think it should be possible to have a normal discussion with those creeps, but for some reason they keep defending an indefensible case.

[John Corbett]

Answers do indeed destroy narratives. That's why LNs don't answer critical questions.

In the past 20 years I have met only one LN who had the cojones to agree that certain claims in the WC reports were not supported by evidence

Such as...

and that certain parts of the narrative were extremely problematic.

Such as...

[quote[
He died a few years ago but I still miss our open and honest discussions. Too bad there are not more LNs like him. Instead I'm dealing with a bunch of lying, dishonest weasels who are desperately trying to defend the indefensible.
[/quote]

Projecting again.

[Martin Weidmann]

I repeat;

 One would think it should be possible to have a normal discussion with those creeps, but for some reason they keep defending an indefensible case.

Evidence has just been provided by one of the creeps. Gotta love their ignorance! 

And here's some more;

This idiot claimed that I had made up evidence out of thin air, so I showed him the evidence by posting two of the reports (there are more!) and schooled him.

He admitted he had been wrong but did not apologize. Instead he started to argue about the word "panicked" I had used while expressing my opinion and this vile creature instantly claimed I had lied, by simply expressing my opinion. And why did he do that? Because the creep disagreed in his opinion with the use of the word "panicked".

Now, just how sick is that?

[John Mytton]

I wonder about Vince Baxter, I caught him a couple of times "quoting Mytton" curious he has the same initials as one of his bedtime heroes.

Guess who graced us with his presence today; Mytton's buddy Vincent Baxter

He hasn't posted since 2019, but today there he was;

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php?action=profile;u=925

Must be a coincidence, right?

What can I say, you got me, because of my split personality I need to view this site through two different perspectives, hence the reason I regularly log in my alter ego and even though I haven't posted for 7 years as support for my own posts I still have an undeniable need to have his name in the recently logged in members, just to mess with you!
Whereas all your sock puppets who while posting were the most angry fanatical JFKA posters the World has ever seen, but suddenly lost all interest after their sock puppet status was discovered and ALL of them, every single one fell off the face of the Planet, Hmmm, how about that!?

JohnM 

[Martin Weidmann]

What can I say, you got me, because of my split personality I need to view this site through two different perspectives, hence the reason I regularly log in my alter ego and even though I haven't posted for 7 years as support for my own posts I still have an undeniable need to have his name in the recently logged in members, just to mess with you!
Whereas all your sock puppets who while posting were the most angry fanatical JFKA posters the World has ever seen, but suddenly lost all interest after their sock puppet status was discovered and ALL of them, every single one fell off the face of the Planet, Hmmm, how about that!?

JohnM

It's amazing that you decided to comment. If Baxter had no relationship with you, there would have been no reason for you to comment. But then, your ego gets in the way, doesn't it. You have to comment if you want to or not. It's compulsory for you.

So, yes, you got caught!

And no, you didn't regularly log in your alter ego (nice of you to admit it is indeed your alter ego), you had him show up after seven years at the exact moment that his name came up in the discussion! I had forgotten about him. But you, as the obsessive savant will carry this crap all your life and take it to your grave and that's just sad.

Whereas all your sock puppets who while posting were the most angry fanatical JFKA posters the World has ever seen, but suddenly lost all interest after their sock puppet status was discovered and ALL of them, every single one fell off the face of the Planet, Hmmm, how about that!?

Thank you for exposing your obsession yet again. Why don't you get it through your thick skull that nobody except you is interested in this crap?  It says more about you than about me.

[John Mytton]

And no, you didn't regularly log in your alter ego (nice of you to admit it is indeed your alter ego), you had him show up after seven years at the exact moment that his name came up in the discussion! I had forgotten about him.

Well actually a quick check of Vincent Baxter's posting history shows that he last posted in 2022, so you got that wrong, can't you get anything right!

And talk about obsession, you poor deluded little man, you've made numerous posts mentioning Vincent Baxter and he didn't magically appear, not once, so you got that wrong too. Pathetic!

"John Mytton" is indeed using a fake name, so, yes, it's possible.

Remarkable that you decided to come to his aid, or maybe not since you two have so much in common. 
Now all we have to do is wait for Vincent Baxter and the party is complete.

BTW where's Tom?

I suspect he's with Vincent Baxter

Obviously I'm not really John Mytton because he died a long time ago, but perhaps I'm Vincent Baxter or even Roger Collins or Otto Beck.... It's all very confusing.

JohnM