The Brown Paper Bag

[Martin Weidmann]

So who found the bag in its alleged position laying folded on the floor of the SN as the reconstruction photo outline indicates?
So who found the jacket alleged to be laying under a car?
So why does  a jacket that’s carried by an officer in the photo appear as white as the white car in the background? Was the car light gray also?
So why was CE 163 , the blue gray jacket found in the TSBD Domino room?
So why did Whaley the taxi driver indicate that Oswald was wearing at least one jacket?
So why did McWatters  the bus driver say that the man he gave the ticket to was wearing a jacket? 
So where on CE 142 or CE 626 (the 2 WC photos of the bag after processed for prints by Latona  is the palm print? Please SHOW ME WHERE in those photos ,where  the  2 prints found are indicated by some mark or outline?

All valid questions which are kryptonite for the die hard LNs.

[John Corbett]

All valid questions which are kryptonite for the die hard LNs.

It might look like kryptonite to you but it is really just Silly Putty.

[Zeon Mason]

It might look like kryptonite to you but it is really just Silly Putty.

I just wanted  to know the names of the persons whom found the bag and the jacket?
And maybe clean up the WC narrative so it is more understandable to some of the other skeptics  like Martin, Micheal C , Royell and ME too LOL.

Strange we have 2 lefties and 2 Trumpers whom
Are agreeing that there’s something amiss about the WC theory.

[Martin Weidmann]

I just wanted  to know the names of the persons whom found the bag and the jacket?
And maybe clean up the WC narrative so it is more understandable to some of the other skeptics  like Martin, Micheal C , Royell and ME too LOL.

Strange we have 2 lefties and 2 Trumpers whom
Are agreeing that there’s something amiss about the WC theory.

LNs are never going to answer a question that could destroy their narrative.

The only person who saw Oswald leaving the rooming house allegedly wearing a jacket is Earlene Roberts. She was wrong about everything else but when it comes to the jacket the LNs believe her without question. I asked Bill Brown what made Roberts so special that she should be believed he refused to answer.

On the other hand, Frazier saw Oswald carry the flimsy paper bag in the cup of his hand and under his armpit and the LNs are falling all over themselves by desperately trying to discredit Frazier in every way they can imagine.

Frazier had 20/20 vision, Roberts didn't, Frazier saw Oswald for a longer period of time, Roberts only saw him a couple of seconds as he left the house.
Frazier took a polygraph and passed, Roberts was described by her employer as somebody who made up stories.
Frazier was able to describe the bag he had seen, Roberts was unable to describe anything accurate about the jacket.

And yet, according to the LNs Frazier is unreliable and mistaken and Roberts is spot on and 100% believable.

In what universe does that even make sense?

[John Corbett]

I just wanted  to know the names of the persons whom found the bag and the jacket?
And maybe clean up the WC narrative so it is more understandable to some of the other skeptics  like Martin, Micheal C , Royell and ME too LOL.

Strange we have 2 lefties and 2 Trumpers whom
Are agreeing that there’s something amiss about the WC theory.

I have never found a correlation between one's political POV and their POV about the question of conspiracy. There are both LNs and CTs all across the political spectrum. I don't see how one's political leanings should influence whether or not they believe JFK died as a result of a conspiracy. The CTs might be influenced as to who they think the bad guys are but the LNs have no such problem. We know Oswald did it. We see zero compelling evidence that he had any help.

[John Corbett]

LNs are never going to answer a question that could destroy their narrative.

Questions don't destroy narratives. Answers do. All the CTs have ever been able to do is raise questions. They never seem to have any answers. At least no the right ones.

[Martin Weidmann]

Answers do indeed destroy narratives. That's why LNs don't answer critical questions.

In the past 20 years I have met only one LN who had the cojones to agree that certain claims in the WC reports were not supported by evidence and that certain parts of the narrative were extremely problematic. He died a few years ago but I still miss our open and honest discussions. Too bad there are not more LNs like him. Instead I'm dealing with a bunch of lying, dishonest weasels who are desperately trying to defend the indefensible.