Education Forum (No Longer) Moderated by Anti-Semitic Crackpot

[Tommy Shanks]

Mark,
 
     This is, precisely, why I have tried to focus on science in discussions of controversial topics like the JFKA and 9/11.
     
     I trust the scientific method as epistemology. 

     And, in my experience, the people who think the 9/11 science researchers are "Anti-Semitic crackpots" are not knowledgeable about science.

     They think that the 100+ floor steel girders in the Twin Towers were abruptly liquefied by Magic Jet Fuel and burning office furniture.

     It's scientifically absurd.

I know I shouldn't be feeding the troll here, but how do you account for fact that the overwhelming majority of scientists who have studied 9/11 reject your baloney about controlled demolition? They're all wrong? They all believe in "scientifically absurd" conclusions? BTW, people said you were an "Anti-Semitic crackpot" because you promote the work of a known anti-Semite who doesn't believe six million Jews died in the Holocaust. It has nothing to do with "9/11 science."

[Dr. William Niederhut]

I know I shouldn't be feeding the troll here, but how do you account for fact that the overwhelming majority of scientists who have studied 9/11 reject your baloney about controlled demolition? They're all wrong? They all believe in "scientifically absurd" conclusions? BTW, people said you were an "Anti-Semitic crackpot" because you promote the work of a known anti-Semite who doesn't believe six million Jews died in the Holocaust. It has nothing to do with "9/11 science."

Newsflash, fella.  You ARE the troll here.

You, obviously, don't understand the 9/11 science data.

Study my tutorial at the Education Forum link I posted (above) yesterday.

[Tommy Shanks]

Newsflash, fella.  You ARE the troll here.

You, obviously, don't understand the 9/11 science data.

Study my tutorial at the Education Forum link I posted (above) yesterday.

Not going to spend one second "studying" any of your work. I'd just like to know how you can explain the fact that the vast and overwhelming majority of scientific experts reject your controlled demolition stuff. So please enlighten us.. is every single one of them wrong, and you are correct?

[Tom Graves]

Not going to spend one second "studying" any of your work. I'd just like to know how you can explain the fact that the vast and overwhelming majority of scientific experts reject your controlled demolition stuff. So please enlighten us. Is every single one of them wrong, and you are correct?

I'd like to know if Dr. Bill believes two commercial airliners were flown into the Twin Trade Towers, or if that was a hoax perpetuated on us through a combination of induced mass hallucination and forged videos?

If it was two planes, why did the Deep State bad guys feel it necessary to bring down the much shorter (and strangely built) Building 7 by planted explosives, as well?

Does Dr. Bill believe the Deep State bad guys planted explosives in the Twin Towers, too, and that the planes were just "patsies"?

Regardless, wasn't that a bit of overkill (pardon the pun)?

[Tommy Shanks]

I'd like to know if Dr. Bill believes two commercial airliners were flown into the Twin Trade Towers, or if that was a hoax perpetuated on us through a combination of induced mass hallucination and forged videos?

If it was two planes, why did the Deep State bad guys feel it necessary to bring down the much shorter Building 7, through planted explosives, as well?

Wasn't that a bit of overkill (pardon the pun)?

He'd be in good company if he believes that.. JFK loonies like Jack White and James Fetzer tried, and failed, to convince people that no planes hit the towers and that they were instead destroyed by some kind of laser from space? Or a secret weapon nobody had ever seen before? Gimme a friggin break.

[Tom Graves]

He'd be in good company if he believes that.. JFK loonies like Jack White and James Fetzer tried, and failed, to convince people that no planes hit the towers and that they were instead destroyed by some kind of laser from space? Or a secret weapon nobody had ever seen before? Gimme a friggin break.

Here's my edited OP:

I'd like to know if Dr. Bill believes two commercial airliners were flown into the Twin Trade Towers, or if that was a hoax perpetuated on us through a combination of induced mass hallucination and forged videos?

If it was two planes, why did the Deep State bad guys also feel it necessary to bring down the much shorter (and strangely built) Building 7 by planted explosives?

Does Dr. Bill believe the Deep State bad guys planted explosives in the Twin Towers, too, and that the planes were just "patsies"?

Regardless, wasn't Building 7 a bit of overkill (pardon the pun)?

[Dr. William Niederhut]

Yes, Boeings were flown into the targets, by Raytheon's GPS guided remote-piloting technology.

It was successfully tested in Boeings by August of 2001.

Blaming the op on Muslim patsies was PNAC's plan for launching the multi-trillion dollar "War on Terror."

Two questions for beginners.

1) Who blamed Osama Bin Laden and "All Qaeda" for 9/11?

2) What evidence supported the allegation?