Unwanted Science: Scientific Evidence Against the JFK Autopsy Materials

[John Corbett]

   So we have the historic autopsy of a murdered POTUS, and you believe it was merely a "mistake" that they did not get, "qualified FORENSIC pathologist(s)" to do it? There was wall-to-wall "fruit salad" at Bethesda that night, along with 3 Military Dr's doing the hands on work. This was no mistake.   

That's exactly what I believe. I have no reason to believe otherwise.

Hanlon's Razor
Hanlon's Razor, also known as Occam's Razor, is a philosophical razor that suggests a way of eliminating unlikely explanations for human behavior. It is a heuristic tool that encourages people to consider alternative explanations for actions rather than to assume an intent to harm. The adage states: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

This maxim is especially true when we are talking about government operations. I say this as a retired government employee.

The JFK assassination was naturally a very stressful event for all. It is hardly surprising that in such a circumstance, fallible human beings would be more prone to making errors. Errors in judgement, errors of omission, etc. Everyone involved would have better served had they followed the same established and proven procedures that would be used in any other murder investigation. Instead, some people chose to deviate from the norm with less than satisfactory results. The selection of the autopsy team is a glaring example of that.

[Tommy Shanks]

The JFK assassination was naturally a very stressful event for all. It is hardly surprising that in such a circumstance, fallible human beings would be more prone to making errors. Errors in judgement, errors of omission, etc. Everyone involved would have better served had they followed the same established and proven procedures that would be used in any other murder investigation. Instead, some people chose to deviate from the norm with less than satisfactory results. The selection of the autopsy team is a glaring example of that.

John, don't bother explaining this to a conspiracy theorist, especially one at the level of Royell Storing. They're incapable of accepting that sometimes history is changed by coincidence and that people can't remember every single detail about a traumatic event they experienced more than 60 years ago...

[Royell Storing]

That's exactly what I believe. I have no reason to believe otherwise.

Hanlon's Razor
Hanlon's Razor, also known as Occam's Razor, is a philosophical razor that suggests a way of eliminating unlikely explanations for human behavior. It is a heuristic tool that encourages people to consider alternative explanations for actions rather than to assume an intent to harm. The adage states: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

This maxim is especially true when we are talking about government operations. I say this as a retired government employee.

The JFK assassination was naturally a very stressful event for all. It is hardly surprising that in such a circumstance, fallible human beings would be more prone to making errors. Errors in judgement, errors of omission, etc. Everyone involved would have better served had they followed the same established and proven procedures that would be used in any other murder investigation. Instead, some people chose to deviate from the norm with less than satisfactory results. The selection of the autopsy team is a glaring example of that.

   "Stupidity"? There was nothing along the lines of "stupidity" with the WR written description of the JFK "BACK" wound being changed to the "base of the neck". This written change was made knowing that the JFK Autopsy Photos were sealed. And the guy making this change then eventually gets appointed VP and politically ascends to POTUS? With respect to your claim of "stupidity" being responsible for everything, there does come a straw that breaks the camel's back.

[Tom Graves]

"Stupidity"? There was nothing along the lines of "stupidity" with the WR written description of the JFK "BACK" wound being changed to the "base of the neck".

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Do you think the measurements written down by Humes or Boswell (I can never remember which one) regarding the distances between the entrance wound in JFK's lower neck and the lower tip of his mastoid process and the tip of his shoulder blade were grossly inaccurate?

If so, do you think some evil, evil Deep State bad guy made them do that?

-- Tom

[Royell Storing]

   The JFK Autopsy Back Photo speaks for itself.   

[Tom Graves]

The JFK Autopsy Back Photo speaks for itself.

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

What do the measurements speak for?

The evil, evil Deep State?

-- Tom

[John Corbett]

   "Stupidity"? There was nothing along the lines of "stupidity" with the WR written description of the JFK "BACK" wound being changed to the "base of the neck". This written change was made knowing that the JFK Autopsy Photos were sealed. And the guy making this change then eventually gets appointed VP and politically ascends to POTUS? With respect to your claim of "stupidity" being responsible for everything, there does come a straw that breaks the camel's back.

Conspiracy hobbyists have been waiting for that straw for 62 years and are still grasping.

I have no idea why Gerald Ford wanted that change. It made no sense. The geometry of the wounds caused by the single bullet worked perfectly fine with an entry wound on the upper back. IOW, it was an act of stupidity.