Why did Oswald go to the movies?

[John Iacoletti]

Very stupid move by Duncan indeed.

The forum was hacked.  It wasn't Duncan's decision.

Like I said, I don't discuss unsupported claims about what I once may have said.

Wisely.  "Mytton" has a long history of lying about what other people say.

[John Iacoletti]

The Caprio cleansing was not related to a crash.

Oh, sorry, I thought you were talking about the forum restart.  Yes, I was very sad about that.  Agree or disagree with Caprio, his posts were good summaries of the actual evidence.  People could easily have just skipped them if they weren't interested.  There must be a lot of computers with broken PgDn buttons out there.

[Mitch Todd]

Your failure to answer my question has been noted; back on topic...

Your question is nonsense. You want to imply that the lack of an existing receipt for the money order somehow invalidates it as evidence. However, there was no reason for Oswald to keep the PMO stub/receipt once he received and accepted the rifle, so the lack of a stub is neither unexpected nor exceptional. The handwriting on the actual money order has been authenticated as Oswald's signature, which ties it to him. That's all that's needed. Your huffy little aside demonstrates nothing other than you lack any real basis for argument, and would rather rely on vaporous insinuation rather than deal with the actual evidence.

[Mitch Todd]

Do you have some evidence that the Texas Theater tore the tickets in half and gave back the stub?

If they didn't, they are the only theater I know of that didn't. The whole point of tearing the ticket and giving half to the patron is two-fold:

It cancels the ticket: a patron who bought a ticket, saw a movie, and left the theater can't re-enter the place on the half ticket.

It serves as a receipt proving that a customer in the theater proper had purchased a ticket.

Now, do you have any evidence that the Texas Theatre didn't give back stubs? Or are you just trying to play Junior G-Man Grinchiklaus, searching desperately for a Christmas tree light that won't light on one side? 
 

[John Mytton]

If posting an image with no context or explanation is "deceitful" then your picture is "deceitful" too.

My picture, what's that got to do with the assassination? Just another JohnI bait and switch, you continually and might I add unsuccessfully attempt to discredit Markham, first you post a photo of Markham to deceive and then you deliberately lie about her testimony.

Btw since lying and deception is your trademark, your new avatar is oh so appropriate. I like!

JohnM

[Rob Caprio]

Ok, that's your honest experience and I respect that but if we never needed the stub then why do they tear the ticket in half and give us back the stub?

Btw what happened to me being a waste of time? It's kinda like when you said in the long gone Caprio thread that you were going to leave and you did for a while, what happened?

JohnM

Why don't you ask LNers this question when they bid adieu, but keep coming back?

[Rob Caprio]

The forum was hacked.  It wasn't Duncan's decision.

Wisely.  "Mytton" has a long history of lying about what other people say.

It was the second time.

[John Mytton]

Oh, sorry, I thought you were talking about the forum restart.

Hilarious you didn't even read the post or what led to his post but you saw my name and instantly made a fool of yourself.

JohnM