How Did Bart Kamp Create The Lovelady Image?

[Tom Graves]

Please explain the pointed object laying across the Island on the Wiegman still frame. You gotta problem here. A Big, Big Problem on a Wiegman still frame you are swearing by. I am waiting for your explanation.

Oh, you mean the fin of the car that was in front of Wiegman's car as it appeared in the cropped-and-pasted, ten-frames-earlier frame that James pasted into the main frame to give us an expanded view of the scene?

What about it?

In order to show us a wider "landscape" view of the scene, James melded the frame from approx. 01:16 to the frame from approx. 01:28 in the "JFK - Wiegman Film Enhanced One Frame Per Second Part One" clip that's available to view on the Internet.

There are ten frames in that interval. (Count the "jumps.")

Question:

How many frames per second did Wiegman's camera shoot?

Answer:

I don't know.

Do you?

Does it really matter?

Note how the shoulder of the woman standing "next to" Fedora Man is correctly spliced together from the two frames, as is the pole that they're standing "next to"?

What's your problem, Comrade Storing?


Scroll down to James' fine overlay montage and take your second look at it.

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,4597.40.html

[Royell Storing]

Oh, you mean a previous-frame "ghost image" of the fin of the car that was in front of Wiegman's car?

What about it?

In order to show us a wider "landscape" view of the scene, James melded the frame from approx. 01:16 to the frame from approx. 01:28 in the "JFK - Wiegman Film Enhanced One Frame Per Second Part One" clip that's available to view on the Internet.

There are ten frames in that interval.

Question:

How many frames per second did Wiegman's camera shoot?

Answer:

I don't know.

Do you?

Does it really matter?

Note how the shoulder of the man standing next to "Fedora Man" is correctly spliced together from the two frames, as is the pole that they're standing "next to"?

What's your problem, Comrade Storing?

Scroll down to James' fine overlay montage:

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,4597.40.html

   How can you claim anything based on a still frame that you NOW admit includes at least 1 "Ghost Image"?   In addition to that, you admit that same still frame has also been subjected to "splicing". That Wiegman still frame has flat out been Sliced-And-Diced. This is why I encourage you to stick with the Film(s) and still frame(s) "as is". I'm not even going to go into the "Lego Car" stuff. That is comical. 

[Tom Graves]

How can you claim anything based on a still frame that you NOW admit includes at least 1 "Ghost Image"?   In addition to that, you admit that same still frame has also been subjected to "splicing". That Wiegman still frame has flat out been Sliced-And-Diced. This is why I encourage you to stick with the Film(s) and still frame(s) "as is". I'm not even going to go into the "Lego Car" stuff. That is comical.

Dear Comrade Storing,

Read it again and you'll realize that I deleted the phrase "ghost image" before you posted.

Why?

Because the fin isn't really a ghost image but an integral part of a frame that was taken about half-a-second earlier than the main frame and which was cropped by James and melded by him to said larger, half-a-second-later frame in order to give us an expanded view of the scene, and specifically of the area where your MYSTO ABANDONED GETAWAY CAR is probably hidden by the gaggle of people who are standing either on the "island" or in the street near it.

Do you have a problem with that?

Do you think that gaggle of people reassembled itself during that half-second?

Even if it did, what would it matter?

If anything, they HELPED you by hiding your MYSTO "ABANDONED" GETAWAY CAR so you can jump up and down and yell, Look! The MYSTO "ABANDONED" GETAWAY CAR hasn't gotten there quite yet!!!"

LOL!

-- Tom

[Royell Storing]

 Your admitted "deletion" of admitting to a "ghost image", is right in line with your deletion of "you lost me" with respect to Hackerott's shadow work. As Joe Louis used to say, "You can run, but you can't hide". You are running now. You're lack of knowledge will continue to expose you over and over. Just do the research. You will not have to "hide your tracks" with these repeated deletions if you do the work and arm yourself with Knowledge.

[Tom Graves]

Your admitted "deletion" of admitting to a "ghost image", is right in line with your deletion of "you lost me" with respect to Hackerott's shadow work. As Joe Louis used to say, "You can run, but you can't hide". You are running now. You're lack of knowledge will continue to expose you over and over. Just do the research. You will not have to "hide your tracks" with these repeated deletions if you do the work and arm yourself with Knowledge.

Dear Comrade Storing,

I hadn't thought it all the way through and I misspoke.

Now deal with it.

If that gaggle of people somehow reassembled itself during that half-second, then for reasons I explained in my previous post, you and the entire tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorist alternate-world universe should be very grateful that it did.

Because as it stands right now, it looks as though you and The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx") will be sharing the next Nobel Prize for your respective out-of-this-world accomplishments.

COMRADE ROYELL STORING AND HIS KGB-APPOINTED PEER REVIEWERS HAVE SOLVED THE JFK ASSASSINATION!!!!!!

(sarcasm)


-- Tom

[Royell Storing]

 Sure, people make mistakes. But they do Not try to sweep them under the rug/Delete Them. This is what you are repeatedly doing and it reflects poorly on every claim you make.

[Tom Graves]

Sure, people make mistakes. But they do Not try to sweep them under the rug/Delete Them. This is what you are repeatedly doing and it reflects poorly on every claim you make.

Dear Comrade Storing,

Did I sweep my misstatement "under the rug," or did I correct it with a thorough explanation in my next post?

It seems as though you're the one who's stirring up dust clouds because you can't deal with said explanation.

Bottom line: Why do you distrust James' overlay montage?

Do you think it was deviously manipulated by him to make it only seem as though there were about ten motorcade watchers standing on a certain part of the "island" and near it in those two half-second-apart Wiegman frames so that people like me could say, "Storing's MYSTO 'ABANDONED' GETAWAY CAR is probably out of view behind them"?

Stop weeping sweeping and answer the question, Comrade Storing.

-- Tom