Who Were the Two Men Heading *Down* the Stairs at NLT 12:50?

[Royell Storing]

RS:  I am talking about the dirt road portion of the Elm St Extension.

So why did you bring up the limo turn and traffic signal in the Wegman film?

there are NO BOLLARDS between Officer Harkness and this alleged motorcycle cop.

Yes there are! Not only can you see many of them in the Darnell film, others are made obvious when the motorcycle cop walks behind them.

Here, bollards are outlined in red. Note that one is in Harkness' shadow:


Here, "B" marks where the line of bollards is. You can see that two of them are silhouetted by the MC as he walks behind them:


Here he is a half step later:

    Above, we see the "Masquerading Motorcycle Cop". He is quickly moving past Officer Harkness, as Harkness looks to the (L). This impostor is avoiding making eye contact with Harkness.

[Tom Graves]

Above, we see the "Masquerading Motorcycle Cop". He is quickly moving past Officer Harkness, as Harkness looks to the (L). This impostor is avoiding making eye contact with Harkness.

Dear Royell,

Did Peter Dale Scott's, Oliver Stone's, and Alex Jones' evil, evil "Deep State" kill JFK, or did Alex Jones' (sic), Steve Bannon's, and Donald Trump's evil, evil "Administrative State" kill him?

-- Tom

[John Corbett]

     After 62+ yrs, I have proven there was an impostor masquerading as a motorcycle cop inside the railroad yard immediately after the kill shot.

You've proved it to your satisfaction which is a rather low bar. But let's give you the benefit of the doubt and say that is not Officer Haygood. That's a long way from proving conspiracy. You would first need to prove who it is and that it is not a DPD officer. Then you would have to prove that this person was working with the assassin Lee Harvey Oswald. You've got some work to do.
 

And you ask, "What difference does that make"? Are you aware of anyone that on 11/22/63, had a DPD motorcycle cop uniform just laying around and decided to wear it inside Dealey Plaza?

I don't have to be aware of any such thing. The burden is on you to prove your hypothesis. You apparently have proved it to your satisfaction, but if you expect anyone to take you seriously, you'll have to do better than that.

And then, after the kill shot, for whatever reason, decided to race back deep inside the railroad yard? Getting back inside there BEFORE anyone connected to law enforcement managed to get back there? That Phony Motorcycle Cop was in costume, back inside the railroad yard before the kill shot. The proof of this Masquerading Motorcycle Cop proves a conspiracy. This is right in line with the Rob Reiner presentation.
   

Your approach is typical of what I have seen in 35 years of engaging with conspiracy hobbyists. You treat every anomaly, every unexplained event as proof of a conspiracy. It isn't enough to raise questions. You need to find answers if you want to prove your case. You don't get to say, we don't know the answer to these questions so the answer must be that there was a conspiracy. Sorry, but conspiracy is not the default answer for every unexplained question raised. You need to prove that the cop in question is not a DPD cop and that he was a co-conspirator in the assassination of JFK. But that is a step conspiracy hobbyists never take and few even bother to try. You don't prove anything simply by raising questions. You have to prove the answers to the questions you raise. You haven't even come close.