The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish

Author Topic: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish  (Read 6183 times)

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3477
Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #104 on: July 09, 2025, 10:38:51 AM »
Advertisement
    You do know that "Viva Zavada" worked for KODAK?  Retired while working for KODAK?  And please refrain from the "Lying" and "Ignorant" slanders. That does nothing to further this discussion.

 You do know that "Viva Zavada" worked for KODAK?  Retired while working for KODAK?

Of course he worked for Kodak!!
Where do you think the "world's leading expert" on Kodachrome II is going to work?
The Post Office?
What a ridiculous point to make.

As you know absolutely nothing about Roland Zavada and his work, I'll get you started with his biography:

Mr. Zavada retired, as a Standards Director for Imaging Technologies, from Eastman Kodak in March 1990. His past responsibilities included coordinating the activities of the Consumer Video and Broadcast Telecine Television Evaluation Laboratories, a product engineer on reversal motion picture films, and as a principal member of the teams that introduced Kodachrome II, Ektachrome Commercial and Kodachrome int Film and that developed the Super 8 system.

He has a BS from Purdue University, a degree in Photo Science from the Rochester Institute of Technology, and a MBA from the University of Rochester.

He began his standards activity with the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) in 1962. In 1966, he assumed responsibility for the National and International Standardization of the Super 8 system, becoming chair of the SMPTE's 16mm and 8mm Technology Committee, chair of the Super 8 Technology Committee of the ISO TC-36, and subsequently became chairman of several national and international committees including leader of the United States delegation to ISO-TC36 - Cinematography. Work with the Society culminated with four terms as the Society's Engineering Vice President, 1976-1983.

Mr. Zavada received recognition for his technical contributions by receiving Fellowships from the SMPTE, the British Kinematographic Sound and Television Society, the Audio Engineering Society, and the Rochester Engineering Society.

In 1985, Mr. Zavada received the SMPTE Progress Medal for Technical Achievement and was awarded the Leo East Award as Rochester's 1985 Engineer of the Year. In 1986, he received the SMPTE Agfa Gevaert Gold Medal for outstanding Achievement in film and video imaging interface.

In 1994, Mr. Zavada was elected as a Life member of the Foundation of Motion Picture Pioneers Inc.

In 1995, The Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers conferred its highest award and greatest distinction of Honorary Membership to Mr. Zavada.


"...a principal member of the teams that introduced Kodachrome II, Ektachrome Commercial and Kodachrome int Film and that developed the Super 8 system." Who better to examine the most famous Kodachrome II film ever taken?

And please refrain from the "Lying" and "Ignorant" slanders

When you invent falsehoods what shall we call it if not Lying?
Out of thin air you accuse Zavada of being a "ringer". This is something you've made up because you're losing the argument.
What shall we call that?
As you don't like the word Lying, shall we call it Untruthing?
'When Royell claims Roland Zavada is a ringer he is untruthing'.
Do you prefer that?
And when someone doesn't have the first clue about a particular subject don't we say they are Ignorant regarding that subject?
You know zero about the work of Zavada, doesn't that make you Ignorant about it?
If you don't like that word why don't we say you are displaying your Know-Nothingness about Zavada's work.
And slander?
When you accuse Zavada of being a Ringer you are questioning his honesty and integrity, based on nothing more than your Untruthing and Know-Nothingness - isn't that slander?
How come you get to slander someone for no reason other than you can't hold your argument together, yet start crying when you feel the same thing is being done to you?

That does nothing to further this discussion.

Neither does your constant untruthing and know-nothingness.
And you've yet to explain why Dan Rather has never said he saw a different version of the Z-film than the one we see today.
Why has he never done that, Royell?
Is he a Ringer too?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #104 on: July 09, 2025, 10:38:51 AM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3581
Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #105 on: July 09, 2025, 03:57:30 PM »

  Yawn! His long term connection to KODAK makes him a "Ringer", A "Homer".  Viva Zavada investigating the Zapruder Film is like the FBI and their investigation of Hillary Clinton. Total Shams!

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1337
Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #106 on: July 09, 2025, 09:03:33 PM »
Viva Zavada's investigating the Zapruder Film is like the FBI and their investigation of Hillary Clinton. Total Shams!

Ironically, the guy who investigated Hillary and inadvertently handed the election to Trump by reopening the emails case against her for no good reason eight days before the election because he wanted to "protect the reputation" of the FBI and thought she was going to win, anyway, James Comey, is a true Republican, unlike zombified-by-KGB-disinfo MAGAT "Republicans" like you, Storing.

Or are you a Libertarian "Independent"?
« Last Edit: July 09, 2025, 09:18:58 PM by Tom Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #106 on: July 09, 2025, 09:03:33 PM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3581
Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #107 on: July 09, 2025, 10:52:59 PM »

  You need to define "True Republican". Just because someone is a Registered Republican does Not automatically make them a "True Republican".

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #107 on: July 09, 2025, 10:52:59 PM »