So here we are and they are all out and all of the conspiracy claims over the years by people like Morley about what they are hiding have shown to be wrong. Let's be clear here on what he is doing: He accuses people of murdering JFK, of conspiracy to murder, of framing Oswald, of obstruction of justice, of perjury. Essentially he says Angleton and Joannides and whatever latest name pops into his head of treason. Murder and treason. And he said there's evidence for this in the files and their release would show it. He didn't suggest it. He explicitly said it. Well, they were released and it doesn't show it.
Obstruction of investigations and perjury? Yes.
Murder and treason? No. I haven't heard Morley directly accuse any CIA officers of "murder" or "treason".
Please explain what Morley is wrong about on the obstruction and perjury accusations?
Even the CIA's historian admitted years ago that they covered up some things related to the JFK assassination, which is a form of obstruction. Do you reject the CIA's limited hangout?
Furthermore,
- Were Dick Helms and Angleton truthful when they denied that Oswald was the subject of CIA operations prior to 11/22/63?
No in my opinion based on the documents.- Should George Joannides have disclosed his relationship with Carlos Bringuer and the DRE to the HSCA?
Yes in my opinion based on the documents.
I don't think accusing people of murder is something to be waved away. It's a serious charge.
Please cite specifically what you're referring to. I can't recall Morley doing what you're accusing him doing.
The fact that the only reason you could think they were withheld is because they indicate something illegal or wrong is really an indictment on your thinking, Jon.
I've never said that's the "only" possible reason. I'm open to other possible reasons.
But the anti-transparency crowd have run out of good excuses for rationalizing keeping most of these secrets after 60+ years.