Destroying Evidence Of Murder Is What Murderers & Co-Conspirators Do

[Watson Phillips]

As the moniker of "conspiracy Theorists" is tossed around with such frequency  , meanwhile back at the ranch the one piece of physical murder evidence that nobody can dispute was pierced by a bullet and was not placed in the grave was made to disappear.
Disappear based upon a fact that I defy anyone to deny ?
It was made to disappear because person or persons believed that they personally gained in making it go away .
For all those who like to throw around the term "Conspiracy Theorist" in a disparaging tone , the neutralizing of the single solitary piece of physical evidence of a murder that both did not go into the grave & was officially documented to be " Studied Further"  from ever having eyes layed upon it again , void of any officially documented chain of custody whatsoever, is the very definition of  unmasked conspiracy on multiple levels. 

Where is JFK's brain? This mystery has puzzled America since 1966, when the 35th president's brain suddenly went missing from the National Archives.

Inside Kennedy’s Assassination And Autopsy
The saga of John F. Kennedy’s brain begins on the day he was killed. On Nov. 22, 1963, the president was assassinated while driving through Dallas, Texas. That night, an autopsy at Bethesda Naval Hospital in D.C. determined that the president had been shot twice from above and behind.

[Steve M. Galbraith]

As the moniker of "conspiracy Theorists" is tossed around with such frequency  , meanwhile back at the ranch the one piece of physical murder evidence that nobody can dispute was pierced by a bullet and was not placed in the grave was made to disappear.
Disappear based upon a fact that I defy anyone to deny ?
It was made to disappear because person or persons believed that they personally gained in making it go away .
For all those who like to throw around the term "Conspiracy Theorist" in a disparaging tone , the neutralizing of the single solitary piece of physical evidence of a murder that both did not go into the grave & was officially documented to be " Studied Further"  from ever having eyes layed upon it again , void of any officially documented chain of custody whatsoever, is the very definition of  unmasked conspiracy on multiple levels. 

Where is JFK's brain? This mystery has puzzled America since 1966, when the 35th president's brain suddenly went missing from the National Archives.

Inside Kennedy’s Assassination And Autopsy
The saga of John F. Kennedy’s brain begins on the day he was killed. On Nov. 22, 1963, the president was assassinated while driving through Dallas, Texas. That night, an autopsy at Bethesda Naval Hospital in D.C. determined that the president had been shot twice from above and behind.

It seems to me that you're starting with a conspiracy - concluded there was one - and then arguing backwards from there. That is finding evidence for your already determined outcome. And giving a sinister explanation for the evidence (or lack of it) while not considering innocent ones. That's not how we do things. This is an example of it.

As to the brain: It was removed and photographed (see John Stringer's testimony; he was the Navy corpsmen who took the photos). So why does it matter what happened to it afterwards? The evidence is that RFK was given JFK's brain and likely had it placed in JFK's casket when the burial site was renovated. Or destroyed. Nothing sinister in it at all.

Question: X-rays and photos taken during the autopsy are available. I'm not sure why the brain is needed to tell us what happened to JFK's head/skull? Why aren't the x-rays and photos sufficient?

As to your original claim: there are numerous examples of police/law enforcement destroying evidence in order to either frame an innocent person - or even a guilty one - or railroad the conviction. It doesn't mean *they* committed the crime. They are just framing a person or helping convict them. We have cases nearly every week where a conviction is overturned due to corruption by the prosecutor or police. Exculpatory evidence withheld, for example. Again, it didn't mean the prosecutor or police did the crime.

[Royell Storing]

  The SS STOLE JFK's Body. The SS then STOLE the Crime Scene. They flew the JFK Limo 1/2 way across the country and then immediately quarantined it inside an FBI Crime Lab Garage. The very night of the assassination, the FBI took possession of ALL of the JFK Assassination Evidence that the Dallas Police Dept had collected. This included the alleged Murder Weapon/Carcano Rifle. J. Edgar Hoover sewed this case up tight in under 12 hours. Yet, the SS did absolutely Nothing to eliminate the active shooter(s) when the POTUS was under fire. "Not consistent" or "following orders"?

[Steve M. Galbraith]

If some witnesses to a hit-and-run car accident say the car that took off was black but films and photos of the accident and an examination of the car show that it was white, who should we believe? What color was the car? Black or white?

In the real world of course we conclude that it was white. Witnesses, as we know, can be wrong.

But in conspiracy world there's a 27 step explanation that says the car was black. The photos were faked. The films were faked. The examination of the car showing it was white was faked.

Because they simply can't believe it was really white.

[Watson Phillips]

 The evidence is that RFK was given JFK's brain and likely had it placed in JFK's casket when the burial site was renovated. Or destroyed. Nothing sinister in it at all.

Question: X-rays and photos taken during the autopsy are available. I'm not sure why the brain is needed to tell us what happened to JFK's head/skull? Why aren't the x-rays and photos sufficient?

What "evidence" is there that RFK was "given" the brain & what is the name of the legal official who made the determination that the evidence should disappear short of the "further  examination" ordered by the coroner in a murder investigation was completed ?

Having not shown us your doctorate degree in forensics I am not surprised at all that you are completely " not sure" why the doctors who had eyes on the brain determined that " further study " was required .
Another fact that has escaped your attention is, if a doctor performing an autopsy in a murder investigation officially declares that "further study" is required on a piece of vital evidence, and that evidence is spirited away before the officially ordered investigation is completed, that is a criminal act of a secret and sinister nature .

The doctors also noted in their autopsy report that “The brain is preserved and removed for further study.”

[Charles Collins]

This NY Times article from 1972 indicates the names of the individuals who were apparently involved.

https://www.nytimes.com/1972/08/27/archives/mystery-cloaks-fate-of-brain-of-kennedy-mystery-surrounds-fate-of.html

[Watson Phillips]

This NY Times article from 1972 indicates the names of the individuals who were apparently involved.

https://www.nytimes.com/1972/08/27/archives/mystery-cloaks-fate-of-brain-of-kennedy-mystery-surrounds-fate-of.html

"Mystery", "Apparently", "Supposedly", "Perhaps", "allegedly"

The only terms that can be applied to the secretly missing, bullet penetrated brain, of an Assassinated U.S. President under lock and key in the Fricking United States Archives of all places, under the same roof our constitution is located no less.

Spirited away in a coffee can size container that you cannot just shove in your hip pocket while nobody is looking.

Here is a fact , and not a supposed , maybe, perhaps, fact I can tell you about the National Archives, the day the Presidents brain left the National Archives , there was a person in charge who was fully accountable for it's leaving the building, and identifying who it left the building with , and for how long it was to be gone from the building. & for what purpose it was leaving the building ALL DOCUMENTED UNDER PENALTY OF FEDERAL LAW.

And knowing all these facts here is something else I know without even looking into it .
The National Archives employee that was accountable and was made fully aware  the day that the President's brain left the building, was assured by the sneaking criminalistic conspiratorial thieves  that the federal crime of it's undocumented theft would never  be traced back to the day they were accountable for it's security and it disappeared , because nobody would ever know the day it was taken .

[Steve M. Galbraith]

The brain and other material from the autopsy - photos, tissue slides, et cetera - were reportedly placed in a locker and given to the National Archives under the custody/control of JFK's secretary Eveylyn Lincoln. Mrs. Lincoln later said she gave the material to RFK. RFK reportedly had the brain placed in JFK's grave.

If you insist on a conspiracy then what type of response will you accept? If you will dismiss any innocent explanation then why ask? It's a bad faith question, frankly.

Here: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=145280#relPageId=165&search=Evelyn_Lincoln