The absolute, most convincing photo you will ever see!

[Tom Graves]

What a load of you-know-what.

[Lance Payette]

  Anyone or any alleged Couple sitting on that bench would have had their upper body at a Higher level than that short wall running alongside the bench. None of the images taken immediately before, during, or after the Kill Shot show any Figure(s) above the short wall. Sitzman tells us that this alleged couple got Up from the bench and smashed Pop Bottles as the JFK Limo was going under the Triple Underpass. Either Sitzman was off her rocker or the assassination images were monkey'd with in order to Remove this alleged couple. In addition to this missing Couple, we have the Black Dog Man, Gordon Arnold, and a No Hat Cop that are ALL MISSING from any assassination images showing this area. And, there is also DPD Officer Hargis claiming he ran up to that little wall.  Hargis is also missing from ALL the assassination images of this area. The area from the short wall to the picket fence is without question a JFK Assassination Black Hole.   Stay Tuned!

Your hero and mine, Jefferson Morley, not only fully accepts Sitzman's story but is actively searching for the young couple: https://jfkfacts.substack.com/p/the-couple-on-the-grassy-knoll?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

His article includes the photo of the lunch remains on the bench taken by Jerry Flynn of the Dallas Morning News the same afternoon.

[Royell Storing]

Jerry Organ did some kind of comparison of Betzner and Willis over 20 years ago (see picture at the bottom)... Why was this overlooked?

Once you see it... you can't not see it!

This is likely Black Dog Man, or his accomplice...
He looks as though he has African-American features... with a gun... and tripod... and hat...
Is this the fellow M. Sitzman saw behind the retaining wall?

THIS should go viral!
And it will probably keep some of you up at night...

   With respect to "20 years ago", technology has far surpassed these eye scratching images. This is why Today we can see that Willis 5 shows 2 Men standing at the bottom of The Steps. The 3 Men stuff is Now laughable.

[Lance Payette]

Even 61 years ago, the technology was sufficient for Jerry Flynn's camera to capture the two DPD plainclothes officers looking at the lunch remains on the bench.

Those dang "inconvenient facts," eh? Just ignore 'em - they're no fun!

[Royell Storing]

Even 61 years ago, the technology was sufficient for Jerry Flynn's camera to capture the two DPD plainclothes officers looking at the lunch remains on the bench.

Those dang "inconvenient facts," eh? Just ignore 'em - they're no fun!

   The photo you reference was a "Posed" Photograph. You do know that, right?

[Lance Payette]

   The photo you reference was a "Posed" Photograph. You do know that, right?

Not only do I not know that, but Jefferson Morley doesn't know that (this is from his JFK Facts Substack):

"Later in the afternoon of November 22, Johnny Flynn, a photographer for the Dallas Morning News, captured two Dallas plainclothes detectives looking at the park bench where the couple sat and examining the bag lunch they left behind. The photo confirms the details in Sitzman’s account, and begs the question: what happened to the couple on the knoll?"

Was the bench posed as well? The lunch remains (Tom Thumb buns?) posed? The detectives posed? Johnny Flynn posed? All to confirm Sitzman's story - or was she part of the conspiracy too? Golly, just the effort to cover-up the Black guy with a rifle and tripod was a pretty elaborate conspiracy all by itself!

Believe what you wish, but these ad hoc explanations do end up looking like a Rube Goldberg contraption - all to prop up a photo that has been examined umpteen times. If you can actually prove something new and different, go for it. I say pareidolia until you do.

[Jake Maxwell]

Not only do I not know that, but Jefferson Morley doesn't know that (this is from his JFK Facts Substack):

"Later in the afternoon of November 22, Johnny Flynn, a photographer for the Dallas Morning News, captured two Dallas plainclothes detectives looking at the park bench where the couple sat and examining the bag lunch they left behind. The photo confirms the details in Sitzman’s account, and begs the question: what happened to the couple on the knoll?"

Was the bench posed as well? The lunch remains (Tom Thumb buns?) posed? The detectives posed? Johnny Flynn posed? All to confirm Sitzman's story - or was she part of the conspiracy too? Golly, just the effort to cover-up the Black guy with a rifle and tripod was a pretty elaborate conspiracy all by itself!

Believe what you wish, but these ad hoc explanations do end up looking like a Rube Goldberg contraption - all to prop up a photo that has been examined umpteen times. If you can actually prove something new and different, go for it. I say pareidolia until you do.

We shouldn't get distracted from the larger picture...

We have a convincing image of someone at the corner of the retaining wall, with what could very well be a rifle scope...

Pareidolia is a real condition to consider... but there is an opposite condition that is very effective in distorting reality... perhaps agnosia - specifically visual agnosia - a neurological condition where someone is unable to recognize objects, faces, or patterns despite having intact vision.

AND there are some who are so psychologically set against seeing something, they cannot and will not see it...

There he is... waiting for the president at the corner of the retaining wall...