The Warren Commission Sham

[Dan O'meara]

Edited and bumped for Danny Boy O'meara:

Dear Danny Boy,

You keep avoiding the implications of your "case."

You refuse to answer the questions:

1) "How the heck did the bad guys manage to take possession of Oswald's Carcano so they could fire CE-399 through it?"

2) How in the world did the bad guys deform CE-399 in such a strange way?", and

3) "Why in tarnation did the bad guys deform CE-399 in such a strange way?"

Until you can give plausible answers to these questions, you're just a laughingstock, dude.

-- Tom

Quid Pro Quo bro.
Time for you to start answering questions.
What evidence makes you believe CE399 was found at Parkland?
It can't be a debate if it's just me answering questions.

[Dan O'meara]

I don't need to help Thomas out. Tom is asking the "What sense does that make?" questions that are central to any discussion of CE 399. You cannot answer those fundamental questions in a way that makes conspiratorial sense because - wait for it - no one can. There is abundant evidence that CE 399 was found at Parkland with no contrary evidence apart from what Wright told Tink Thompson three years later. Those who said they "couldn't identify" CE 399 were not "refusing" but simply saying they had no way of knowing it was the same bullet they had handled.

Good grief, I started a thread on THIS VERY TOPIC - "Chain of custody of CE 399 - big problem or much ado about nothing?" - in April of this year: https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,4291.msg164009.html#msg164009. The issue was beaten to death, or so it seems to me. Yet here we go again, as though it had never been discussed.

This is the problem with a forum such as this. There is no historical memory. An issue is beaten to death in April, pops right back up in June, and August, and three times the next year, and four times the year after that. The same old, same old over and over. If you want to know my thoughts in detail, I refer you to the April thread. The first page has three long posts by me.

There is a distinction between "having all the answers" - which I do not claim - and having a reasonable, evidence-based position that can answer the "What sense does that make?" questions. As I've said previously, the Conspiracy Game pretends that if we don't have absolute ontological certainty then we can have no position at all - one theory is as good as another, even if one of them is plausible, evidence-based, and can answer the "What sense does that make?" questions and the other can't. Whatever the provenance of CE 399 may be, whatever Wright may have told Thompson, whatever those in the chain may have said when asked to identify CE 399, I am satisfied that it was fired from Oswald's rifle on 11-22, struck its target, and made its way into Parkland to be found on a stretcher. This is what the best evidence indicates and what can most plausibly and reasonably answer the "What sense does that make?" questions.

"You can't prove to an ontological certainty CE 399 was found at Parkland! You can't prove to an ontological certainty it wasn't planted! You can't prove to an ontological certainty it wasn't created in the FBI Lab!" No, I can't. What those who make such assertions can't do - as Tom keeps trying to point out - is answer "What sense would that make?"

There is abundant evidence that CE 399 was found at Parkland

Great!
Just post that evidence in your next Reply.
That is, basically, the question I have been asking.
The reason these things go on and on is because people like you won't answer a straightforward question.
Just post this "abundant evidence" which you have at your fingertips and we can move on with this issue..
I've answered every question asked of me but you guys don't answer anything.
That's why things just go round and round.

POST THE EVIDENCE IN YOUR NEXT REPLY!

[Tom Graves]

Quid Pro Quo bro.
Time for you to start answering questions.
What evidence makes you believe CE399 was found at Parkland?
It can't be a debate if it's just me answering questions.

The ball's in your court, dude.

I can totally understand why you "have no idea" how to go about answering my three questions (above) in such a way that won't contradict your cockamamie theory.

That's because the only logical answer is:

1) "The bad guys" didn't fire CE-399 through Oswald's Carcano, and

2) Given the wounds to JFK and JBC, only way CE-399 could have ended up being deformed the way that it was was if it passed through JFK's neck from back-to-front, penetrated JBC's back, shattered JBC's fifth rib tangentially, and, while was twirling / tumbling, fractured JBC's radial bone rear-end first.