Debunking the "Jet Effect"?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Debunking the "Jet Effect"?  (Read 27226 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Debunking the "Jet Effect"?
« Reply #7 on: February 15, 2025, 06:43:08 PM »
It's amazing what kind of garbage people will invent and rationalize (even Nobel prize winners) in order to maintain their fiction.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5139
Re: Debunking the "Jet Effect"?
« Reply #8 on: February 15, 2025, 10:30:37 PM »
It's amazing what kind of garbage people will invent and rationalize (even Nobel prize winners) in order to maintain their fiction.

Another Brainless Kook who thinks he's smarter than a Nobel Prize winner in physics who actually reproduced his theorization with real world experiments.
But what you and your Keyboard Warrior mates can't handle is that forever more, the Zapruder film shows only Kennedy's head being thrust forward and down and away from Oswald's rifle on the 6th floor. Case Closed.



JohnM


Offline Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3774
Re: Debunking the "Jet Effect"?
« Reply #9 on: February 15, 2025, 10:41:19 PM »
Another Brainless Kook who thinks he's smarter than a Nobel Prize winner in physics who actually reproduced his theorization with real world experiments.
But what you and your Keyboard Warrior mates can't handle is that forever more, the Zapruder film shows only Kennedy's head being thrust forward and down and away from Oswald's rifle on the 6th floor. Case Closed.



JohnM

Are you having a senior moment John?
JFK's initial head movement is forward because he's just been shot in the back of the head.
What's that got to do with the Jet Effect?

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5139
Re: Debunking the "Jet Effect"?
« Reply #10 on: February 15, 2025, 10:50:07 PM »
Are you having a senior moment John?
JFK's initial head movement is forward because he's just been shot in the back of the head.
What's that got to do with the Jet Effect?

Quote
Are you having a senior moment John?

I'm not a senior but don't let facts get in the way of your delusional accusations.

Quote
JFK's initial head movement is forward because he's just been shot in the back of the head.

Yes, exactly.

Quote
What's that got to do with the Jet Effect?

What happens after the initial impact on a medically proven one point entry, is essentially worthless in solving the crime.

JohnM

Offline Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3774
Re: Debunking the "Jet Effect"?
« Reply #11 on: February 15, 2025, 11:11:38 PM »
I'm not a senior but don't let facts get in the way of your delusional accusations.

Yes, exactly.

What happens after the initial impact on a medically proven one point entry, is essentially worthless in solving the crime.

JohnM

"What happens after the initial impact on a medically proven one point entry, is essentially worthless in solving the crime."

Are you sure you're not having a senior moment?
You're not making any sense.
I'll try again, what does it have to do with the Jet Effect?
Please gather your thoughts before coming up with a coherent answer.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5139
Re: Debunking the "Jet Effect"?
« Reply #12 on: February 15, 2025, 11:46:51 PM »
"What happens after the initial impact on a medically proven one point entry, is essentially worthless in solving the crime."

Are you sure you're not having a senior moment?
You're not making any sense.
I'll try again, what does it have to do with the Jet Effect?
Please gather your thoughts before coming up with a coherent answer.

Are you having comprehension problems, if so let me repeat my comment.

What happens after the initial impact on a medically proven one point entry, is essentially worthless in solving the crime.

And I already stated earlier with examples of Real World reproductions of what happened after, that explains why Kennedy went back and to the left.
But let me further clarify, Kennedy was shot from behind, the majority of the internal pressure escaped through the front right side of Kennedy's head and therefore the reaction was in the exact opposite direction of back and to the left.



Now you may theorize that a second undetected bullet which left no damage came from the front right and that is your right, but you'd be wrong.

JohnM

Offline Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3774
Re: Debunking the "Jet Effect"?
« Reply #13 on: February 16, 2025, 12:11:59 AM »
Are you having comprehension problems, if so let me repeat my comment.

What happens after the initial impact on a medically proven one point entry, is essentially worthless in solving the crime.


Yes John, I am having problems comprehending what you're posting but I don't think that's on me.
I still haven't got a clue what the above comment has to do with the Jet Effect.
I'm not going to ask for you to clarify it again as it's getting nowhere.
What happens after the initial impact is worthless in solving the crime??
If any other forum member can help me understand what this comment has to do with the Jet Effect, please help.

Quote
And I already stated earlier with examples of Real World reproductions of what happened after, that explains why Kennedy went back and to the left.
But let me further clarify, Kennedy was shot from behind, the majority of the internal pressure escaped through the front right side of Kennedy's head and therefore the reaction was in the exact opposite direction of back and to the left.



 "...the majority of the internal pressure escaped through the front right side of Kennedy's head..."


What evidence do you have for this?
Especially when you are showing an image that clearly demonstrates the pressure escaped through the top of his head.

Quote
Now you may theorize that a second undetected bullet which left no damage came from the front right and that is your right, but you'd be wrong.

JohnM

WTF are you on about?