Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory  (Read 36040 times)

Offline Michael Walton

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 443
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #136 on: August 18, 2019, 01:42:54 PM »
Advertisement
Sure, John, sure. I had to double check but Ford got it spot on "back of the neck."

Here's what it looked like during the autopsy:



...and then I checked it again on Wiki:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neck

Yep, Ford got it right, alright.

Another wonderfully biased piece of AnAlysis.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #136 on: August 18, 2019, 01:42:54 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #137 on: August 18, 2019, 07:24:27 PM »
Sure, John, sure. I had to double check but Ford got it spot on "back of the neck."

Here's what it looked like during the autopsy:



...and then I checked it again on Wiki:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neck

Yep, Ford got it right, alright.

Another wonderfully biased piece of AnAlysis


Junction City train station

A voice comes over the intercom:
'Back, meet neck... neck, meet back'

Back: Guess we'll have to share the fame on this one, huh?
Neck: Seems only fair, since the Inshot landed right on top of the both of us.
Back: We'll flip for who gets top billing.
Neck: Nah, back/neck.. neck/back.. no biggee, as long as both are included when describing the twofer.
Back: Okay, let's take a shot at it.
« Last Edit: August 19, 2019, 07:13:35 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Tom Scully

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1216
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #138 on: August 18, 2019, 08:38:16 PM »
Hi Mike O --

The people on this board can only handle one conspiracy at a time so let's stick to JFK. :-)

Ford - yes, just a nice little last-minute tweak to the official report to shove that round peg into a square hole a little bit further.

Hale Boggs - heard about the plane crash; don't think anything sinister happened

Brown and Clinton - never heard of such a conspiracy

Ted Kennedy crash - probably just a run-of-the-mill crash

JFK Junior's crash - he should have never been flying so late in the day. He was not instrument rated and lost his bearings up there. Nothing sinister.

Michael, much more often than not, I agree with your posted opinions/details, including in your post quoted above.
However, 20 years ago last month, I found this burial at sea of Lauren Bessette, a V.P. of a prominent Wall Street firm to be "hinky".

The "PTB" knew as well as you and I do that "stuff" like this is never "put to bed," so why on earth do they predictably opt to and act as catalysts to perpetuate curiousity and doubt? Is the answer simply that they choose what they perceive at the time to be the least bad of only bad choices available?

This begs the question; if the "PTB" demonstrate such consistently poor judgment in the atmosphere of what they so often
tout as an "open society" why is it reasonable (mandatory ?) to accept their official pronouncements? Is it only reasonable because the alternative is to be marginalized by this same alliance of journalists and "movers and shakers"?

Quote
https://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/30/opinion/30iht-edcarroll.4.6900205.html
The peril of valuing celebrity over history
By JAMES CARROLLJULY 30, 2007

....the simultaneously banalizing methods of capitalist enterprise (false advertising, consumerism, pieties of affluence, amoral bureaucracy) are exactly what that enterprise created to keep from being criticized.....

85 year old, FBI "take down":
Quote
Indiana cemetery objects to plan to exhume body of gangster John ...
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/breaking/ct-john-dillinger-body-exhumation-20190815-4nk2wv6owbd4ll2ganaft7qdja-story.html
3 days ago - The Indianapolis cemetery where 1930s gangster John Dillinger is buried is objecting to his body's planned exhumation as part of a television ...
Why John Dillinger's Relatives Want to Exhume His Body | Smart News

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/why-john-dillingers-relatives-want-exhume-his-body-180972801/
Aug 2, 2019 - After the notorious bank robber John Dillinger was shot to death by federal agents in 1934, thousands of spectators converged at his funeral, ...

82 year old crash:
Quote
Finding Amelia Earhart's Plane Seemed Impossible. Then Came a ...
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/12/science/amelia-earhart-search-robert-ballard.html
6 days ago - Dr. Ballard has always wanted to find the remains of the plane Amelia Earhart was flying when she disappeared in 1937. But he feared the hunt ...
Inside Robert Ballard's search for Amelia Earhart's airplane

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/2019/08/inside-search-for-amelia-earhart-airplane/
6 days ago - Many attempts have been made to discover the famed aviator's fate, but never with the technological tools at Robert Ballard's disposal.
Robert Ballard Launches Search for Amelia Earhart's Airplane

https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/robert-ballard-launches-search-for-amelia-earhart-s-airplane
6 days ago - Famed oceanographer Dr. Robert Ballard and the crew of his foundations research vessel, the Nautilus...

Quote
http://edition.cnn.com/US/9907/22/kennedy.plane.01/index.html
...Officials also said the Navy has given approval for the remains of his wife, Carolyn Bessette Kennedy, and her sister, Lauren Bessette, to be buried at sea, but it was not immediately clear if the women's family has elected to do so...

Quote
https://www.nytimes.com/1999/07/23/us/kennedy-burial-overview-private-ceremony-sea-for-3-kennedy-plane.html
 ...July 23, 1999

...Mr. Kennedy did not meet any of the criteria for people who are automatically entitled to naval commitment at sea. The special service was possible only because of a dispensation from the Secretary of Defense, William S. Cohen, in response to a request from Mr. Kennedy's uncle, Senator Edward M. Kennedy.

Such ceremonies are usually reserved for active or retired military members, their spouses and dependent children. A Defense Department official said the service itself did not follow military protocol, but instead was a religious service.

Officials acknowledged that the service was unprecedented. But the Pentagon spokesman, Kenneth H. Bacon, defended the decision, saying, ''It's a family that has distinguished itself through public service and sacrificed itself through public service for more than 30 years.''...

Quote
https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a28188303/lauren-bessette-carolyn-kennedy-sister-facts/
The Other Passenger: Who Was Lauren Bessette?
Reduced to a footnote to the national tragedy of losing JFK Jr. and his wife Carolyn, Lauren Bessette was a star in her own right—accomplished, ambitious, beautiful, and loved by her friends.

by ADRIENNE GAFFNEY
JUL 9, 2019 ....
...In any other grouping, Lauren would have been the star. Thirty-four years old and on the fast track at Morgan Stanley, Bessette had an Ivy League MBA, was fluent in Mandarin, and had a sophisticated group of friends. She was the kind of New York City talent many people dream of befriending. Her friends say she was brilliant, compassionate, quick witted, and a champion of those who were struggling. One colleague told the New York Observer, “She may have been more successful than [John and Carolyn] were.”...

The plane wreckage itself was accorded superior security than BOP extended to Mr. Epstein, in Brooklyn this month!

Quote
https://photo.wn.com/lauren_bessette
OTIS AIR FORCE BASE, MA, UNITED STATES
07.22.1999
Courtesy Photo
U.S. Coast Guard District 1 
 Subscribe 32
Otis AFB, MA (July 22) -- The wooden wall that conceals the wreckage of John F. Kennedy's Piper Saratoga airplane Air Station Cape Cod hangar. John F. Kennedy Jr., his wife Carolyn and her sister Lauren Bessette. The three died when Kennedy's crashed into the sea July 17. USCG photo by MILNES, PETE PA1USCG photo by MILNES, PETE PA1

« Last Edit: August 18, 2019, 08:56:49 PM by Tom Scully »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #138 on: August 18, 2019, 08:38:16 PM »


Offline Michael Walton

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 443
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #139 on: August 18, 2019, 08:48:06 PM »
From the junction where the back joins the neck

A voice comes over the intercom:
'Back, meet neck... neck, meet back'

Back: Guess we'll have to share the fame on this one, huh?
Neck: Seems only fair, since the Inshot landed right on top of the both of us.
Back: We'll flip for who gets top billing.
Neck: Nah, back/neck.. neck/back.. no biggee, as long as both are included when describing the twofer.
Back: Okay, let's take a shot at it.

Sure, Bill, sure. There's a thing in anatomy called the nape:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nape

The very first line at the above says the back of the neck.

Now if you want to argue and disagree over thousands of medical professionals who call that area the nape - that loose fold of skin that everyone has - vs a politician who was trying to further a square peg into a round hole - then you go right ahead. And you know, it's the same politician who pardoned one of the most corrupt US presidents in US history rather than let him face the consequences.

But it sure looks to me like that bullet hole is well below the nape, also known as the back of the neck.

But that's OK Bill. Let that old Kennedy bias hate creep in, blinding you to what's obvious to many more unbiased eyes.


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #140 on: August 19, 2019, 07:04:27 AM »
Sure, Bill, sure. There's a thing in anatomy called the nape:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nape

The very first line at the above says the back of the neck.

Now if you want to argue and disagree over thousands of medical professionals who call that area the nape - that loose fold of skin that everyone has - vs a politician who was trying to further a square peg into a round hole - then you go right ahead. And you know, it's the same politician who pardoned one of the most corrupt US presidents in US history rather than let him face the consequences.

But it sure looks to me like that bullet hole is well below the nape, also known as the back of the neck.

But that's OK Bill. Let that old Kennedy bias hate creep in, blinding you to what's obvious to many more unbiased eyes.

LOL

BTW, you sound exactly like a certain 'Eddie Haymaker' who posted here a few months back, 'Michael'.

My 'Junction City' back/neck 'dialog' is concerned with the C7-T1 (14x14cm) position claimed by some as the inshoot location. The following describes the location in medical terminology.

All About the C7-T1 Spinal Segment (Cervicothoracic Junction)
https://www.spine-health.com/conditions/spine-anatomy/cervical-spine-anatomy
by Stefano Sinicropi, MD.
[Peer Reviewed]

EXCERPTS

The C7-T1 spinal segment, sometimes referred to as the cervicothoracic junction is located at the very bottom of the neck. More specifically, this is where the neck connects with the upper back
[...]
This spinal segment is unique because it is the point of transition from the highly flexible neck to the nearly completely inflexible upper back.
« Last Edit: August 19, 2019, 07:42:12 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #140 on: August 19, 2019, 07:04:27 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #141 on: August 19, 2019, 07:59:06 AM »
Sure, Bill, sure. There's a thing in anatomy called the nape:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nape

The very first line at the above says the back of the neck.

Now if you want to argue and disagree over thousands of medical professionals who call that area the nape - that loose fold of skin that everyone has - vs a politician who was trying to further a square peg into a round hole - then you go right ahead. And you know, it's the same politician who pardoned one of the most corrupt US presidents in US history rather than let him face the consequences.

But it sure looks to me like that bullet hole is well below the nape, also known as the back of the neck.

But that's OK Bill. Let that old Kennedy bias hate creep in, blinding you to what's obvious to many more unbiased eyes.

Seconds later shots resounded in rapid succession. The President's hands moved to his neck. He appeared to stiffen momentarily and lurch slightly forward in his seat. A bullet had entered the base of the back of his neck slightly to the right of the spine.
https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/chapter-1











JohnM
« Last Edit: August 19, 2019, 08:02:30 AM by John Mytton »

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2277
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #142 on: August 19, 2019, 03:45:06 PM »


The bullet went between the transverse processes of C7 and T1, with missile pressure causing a non-displaced fracture of the T1 transverse process.

   

The entry wound is above the scapula (seen as bumps on the autopsy back photo) and below the neck creases. The so-called "back wound" is in the neck region and above the throat wound.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #142 on: August 19, 2019, 03:45:06 PM »


Offline Michael Walton

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 443
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #143 on: August 20, 2019, 01:54:50 AM »
Sure, John, sure. You didn't even look at the neck link I posted. And here's a photo from your heroes.



That's NOT the neck, John. It's not. You're being very clever by posting that cutaway 3D photo that shows the spinal column because any dumbass would think that because the column is in the neck that makes the lower portion part of the neck. And it's not.

And it was not a mistake in the final report. They got it right the first time UNTIL old Gerry penciled in "...of neck."

But you go right on ahead and remain unbiased in your ANALysis.