Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory  (Read 111531 times)

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #105 on: March 24, 2018, 01:43:53 AM »
Ford moved the back wound , thus creating " The Magic Bullet " CE 399 !

Ford never moved any wound by even as much as a mm in any direction.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #106 on: March 25, 2018, 02:08:48 AM »


         There is clearly a difference between a person's BACK and their NECK.

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #107 on: March 25, 2018, 02:54:37 PM »
Ford never moved any wound by even as much as a mm in any direction.

Correct. He would have had to have been present at the autopsy so to do. What he did, was change the description of the position of the wound. Easy peasy.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #108 on: March 25, 2018, 03:39:37 PM »
Right, generic face sheets are used in virtually all autopsies so the location of wounds and injuries on the

deceased can be obscured. geez


Tell us Bill are JFK's wounds accurately depicted in the illustrations below?





The head shot looks relatively accurate if Jackie's statement 'top, behind the forehead' was accurate.

I prefer actual photos to drawings. How a wound position is described to an artist is the responsibility of the person describing it; if the result is inaccurate then something went sideways between the two.

Do you understand the difference between sloped v square shoulders
Show us where Kennedy's square* shoulders match the sloped shoulders in the generic face sheet drawing
Show us where the 14 x 14 measurement noted on the face sheet changed position

Again, tell us how a face sheet drawing is meant to replace the actual measurement of the body itself.

*Hint: Google 'JFK shoulders swim'
« Last Edit: March 25, 2018, 04:36:59 PM by Bill Chapman »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #109 on: March 25, 2018, 03:49:45 PM »
Do you understand the difference between sloped v square shoulders
Show us where Kennedy's square* shoulders match the sloped shoulders in the generic face sheet drawing
Show us where the 14 x 14 measurement noted on the face sheet changed position

Again, tell us how a face sheet drawing is meant to replace the actual measurement of the body itself.

*Hint: Google 'JFK shoulders swim'


           The  Autopsy Photos of JFK 's BACK Wound in No Way resemble the cockamamie illustrations you have provided above.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #110 on: March 25, 2018, 04:10:58 PM »

           The  Autopsy Photos of JFK 's BACK Wound in No Way resemble the cockamamie illustrations you have provided above.

A more apt description of the twofer inshoot would be 'neck/back' wound, given that the missile struck precisely at the junction where the neck merges into the back (according to the autopsy, and described elsewhere as such)

Gary provided the 'cockamamie' illustrations above, not me. I agree they look wonky; pretty sure JFK would be hard-pressed to remain in that bolt-upright position, or even attain it.
« Last Edit: March 25, 2018, 05:29:06 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #111 on: March 25, 2018, 05:19:38 PM »
Correct. He would have had to have been present at the autopsy so to do. What he did, was change the description of the position of the wound. Easy peasy.

Close enough. He recommended changing the description of the position of wound. Rightly so.