Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory  (Read 4018 times)

Online Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 830
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #10 on: March 12, 2018, 02:45:03 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
"The authentic autopsy photos show that the wound was not below the shoulder.'

 ::)

During an executive session of the WC Rankin tells McCloy they have color photos of JFK's body from the autopsy


Rankin tells another executive session of the WC they have a picture showing the wound in JFK's back is lower than the one in the front of his neck.


Rankin was wrong.  So what?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #10 on: March 12, 2018, 02:45:03 PM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 251
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #11 on: March 12, 2018, 03:09:10 PM »


         54+ years after the fact, your claim of "Rankin was Wrong" is the Best Rebuttal you can come up with? The glaring snippet amidst all of that was the statement regarding "....we don't have the Minutes of the Autopsy". 

Online Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 830
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #12 on: March 12, 2018, 03:47:33 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
54+ years after the fact, your claim of "Rankin was Wrong" is the Best Rebuttal you can come up with?

You must have missed it.  The autopsy photos show that Rankin was simply wrong.  So what?

Offline Gary Craig

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 369
  • The human mind is our fundamental resource. JFK
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #13 on: March 12, 2018, 05:49:15 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Rankin was wrong.  So what?

So you've seen the color autopsy photographs of JFK's body that Rankin is referencing at those WC Executive

Sessions?

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1115
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #14 on: March 12, 2018, 07:21:27 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
So you've seen the color autopsy photographs of JFK's body that Rankin is referencing at those WC Executive

Sessions?

 Rankin never saw any autopsy photos during the WC investigation.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2018, 08:17:19 PM by Tim Nickerson »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #14 on: March 12, 2018, 07:21:27 PM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1115
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #15 on: March 12, 2018, 07:23:27 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

         54+ years after the fact, your claim of "Rankin was Wrong" is the Best Rebuttal you can come up with? The glaring snippet amidst all of that was the statement regarding "....we don't have the Minutes of the Autopsy".

Rankin said that the bullet entered below the shoulder blade.



Was Rankin wrong?


Offline Wesley Johnson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #16 on: March 12, 2018, 08:50:54 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a member of the Warren Commission that investigated the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy, Gerald Ford suggested that the panel change its initial description of the bullet wound in Kennedy's back to place it higher up in the body. The change, critics said, may have been intended to support the controversial theory that a "single bullet" struck Kennedy from behind, exited his neck and then wounded Texas Gov. John B. Connally Jr. The Warren Commission relied on it heavily in concluding that Lee Harvey Oswald was Kennedy's lone assassin, firing from a sniper's nest above and behind the president in the Texas School Book Depository. Ford's handwritten editing, revealed in newly disclosed papers kept by the commission's general counsel, was accepted with a slight change. The initial draft of the report stated: "A bullet had entered his {Kennedy's} back at a point slightly below the shoulder to the right of the spine." Ford wanted it to read:" A bullet had entered the back of his neck slightly to the right of the spine."   The Final Report said:" A bullet had entered the base of the back of his neck slightly to the right of his spine."       The Washington Post  By George Lardner Jr. July 3 , 1997

What you have to do is go by the autopsy report which states "situated on the upper right posterior thorax just above the upper border of the scapula there is a 7x4 millimeter oval wound. This wound is measured to be 14 cm from the tip of the right acromion process and 14 cm below the tip of the right mastoid process."
Also, there are several problems with CTers claiming this bullet did not pass through the president's body and hit Gov. Connally.
 One is: if this bullet did not create the exit wound to the president's throat then where is the exit wound for that shot and where did the bullet go? If it did exit (which there is no exit for) then the only thing in front of the president was Gov. Connally? Why was the Gov. not hit twice? Since there is no exit wound for this shot then the bullet would have remained in the president's body. It was not found.
 Two: If this shot did not pass through the president's body and create the wound to the president's throat and hit Gov. Connally then the wound to the throat was caused by a shot from the front through the windshield (as a lot of CTers claim) then where is the exit wound for that shot? If that bullet did not exit then where did it go? That bullet was not found. So, conspiracy people, you have two disappearing bullets that you have to explain. Talk about magic.   

Online Royell Storing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 251
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #17 on: March 12, 2018, 09:09:43 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
What you have to do is go by the autopsy report which states "situated on the upper right posterior thorax just above the upper border of the scapula there is a 7x4 millimeter oval wound. This wound is measured to be 14 cm from the tip of the right acromion process and 14 cm below the tip of the right mastoid process."
Also, there are several problems with CTers claiming this bullet did not pass through the president's body and hit Gov. Connally.
 One is: if this bullet did not create the exit wound to the president's throat then where is the exit wound for that shot and where did the bullet go? If it did exit (which there is no exit for) then the only thing in front of the president was Gov. Connally? Why was the Gov. not hit twice? Since there is no exit wound for this shot then the bullet would have remained in the president's body. It was not found.
 Two: If this shot did not pass through the president's body and create the wound to the president's throat and hit Gov. Connally then the wound to the throat was caused by a shot from the front through the windshield (as a lot of CTers claim) then where is the exit wound for that shot? If that bullet did not exit then where did it go? That bullet was not found. So, conspiracy people, you have two disappearing bullets that you have to explain. Talk about magic.   

      (1) There is an Autopsy Photo which clearly displays the wound in JFK's BACK to be well Below the base of his neck. (2) The Autopsy Face Sheet clearly displays JFK's BACK Wound to be well Below the base of his neck (3) Humes placed his finger into JFK's BACK Wound. His finger Stopped at roughly his 1st knuckle. These are FACTS. Your questions above are the direct result of having bought into the nonsensical SBT.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2018, 09:11:44 PM by Royell Storing »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #17 on: March 12, 2018, 09:09:43 PM »


Offline Wesley Johnson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #18 on: March 12, 2018, 09:23:26 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
      (1) There is an Autopsy Photo which clearly displays the wound in JFK's BACK to be well Below the base of his neck. (2) The Autopsy Face Sheet clearly displays JFK's BACK Wound to be well Below the base of his neck (3) Humes placed his finger into JFK's BACK Wound. His finger Stopped at roughly his 1st knuckle. These are FACTS. Your questions above are the direct result of having bought into the nonsensical SBT.

Okay, Royell where did the two bullets go? And it was Humes that wrote the report stating where the hole in the back was. Where did that bullet go? Where is the exit wound for it? How much experience do you have with firearms, in particular, rifles? Rifle bullets go through things Royell. Explain to me what evidence you can cite to explain where the back wound bullet went to and where the throat wound bullet went to? Where are they? So, going by what you claimed as a pertinent fact, you are saying that a rifle bullet only penetrated "one knuckle"? Is that what you are saying? LMAO. A pellet gun would go in farther. You might want to rethink that. Have you ever stuck your finger in a wound to soft flesh? 

Online Royell Storing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 251
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2018, 10:08:08 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Okay, Royell where did the two bullets go? And it was Humes that wrote the report stating where the hole in the back was. Where did that bullet go? Where is the exit wound for it? How much experience do you have with firearms, in particular, rifles? Rifle bullets go through things Royell. Explain to me what evidence you can cite to explain where the back wound bullet went to and where the throat wound bullet went to? Where are they? So, going by what you claimed as a pertinent fact, you are saying that a rifle bullet only penetrated "one knuckle"? Is that what you are saying? LMAO. A pellet gun would go in farther. You might want to rethink that. Have you ever stuck your finger in a wound to soft flesh?

              Humes NEVER bought into the SBT. He knew that was pure Baloney. For 1 thing, he Knew that there were More bullet fragments remaining inside Connally than was missing from the Pristine Bullet
             The bullet that created the shallow JFK BACK Wound was recovered at Parkland Hospital. This is why Specter had to dance a jig during WC Q/A to try and move that bullet onto/off of Connally's stretcher.
             The throat wound/Bullet was removed/recovered from JFK's body at Bethesda. This is 1 of the reasons the body of JFK needed to arrive at Bethesda Early/Before Jackie & the empty casket. There is No disputing the early arrival of JFK's body. The arrival time of approx 18:35 is Documented on Sgt Roger Boyajian's Official MD 236, and corroborated by Humes ARRB Testimony.   

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2018, 10:08:08 PM »