JFK's Dramatic Z226-232 Reaction: More Proof that the SBT Is a Silly Myth

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: JFK's Dramatic Z226-232 Reaction: More Proof that the SBT Is a Silly Myth  (Read 87048 times)

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Take the time to read Officer Luke Mooney's WC Testimony. Then get back to me. I feel like I am taking advantage of you.

Storing,

When are you going to finally answer my questions?

1) How many bad guys and really, really bad gals to you figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, the escaping, and the all-important cover up? Just a few, or oodles and gobs?

2) Does Vladimir Putin pay you, or do you do it for free?
« Last Edit: June 03, 2025, 03:09:39 PM by Tom Graves »

Offline Michael T. Griffith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1529
    • JFK Assassination Website
Storing, When are you going to finally answer my questions?

1) How many bad guys and really, really bad gals to you figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, the escaping, and the all-important cover up? Just a few, or oodles and gobs?

Take the time to read Officer Luke Mooney's WC Testimony. Then get back to me. I feel like I am taking advantage of you.

Asking these questions over and over appears to be Graves' way to avoid discussing evidence he can't explain or doesn't understand.

It's as if we were discussing the case of the 778 Uganda cult members who died in 2000. The incident was originally thought to be a case of mass suicide but was later ruled to be a case of mass murder. Graves' canned response to the clear evidence that they were murdered would be "How many really bad guys were involved in the planning of these hundreds of murders and staging them to look like suicides by fire and poisoning?" The victims were originally thought to have died in a mass suicide by fire and poisoning, but it was later discovered that over 400 victims were strangled, stabbed, and then buried in nearby pits. But Graves would ignore this evidence and keep implying that the cult members could not have been murdered because the crime would have required an impossibly large conspiracy.


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Asking these questions over and over appears to be Graves' way to avoid discussing evidence he can't explain or doesn't understand.

It's as if we were discussing the case of the 778 Uganda cult members who died in 2000. The incident was originally thought to be a case of mass suicide but was later ruled to be a case of mass murder. Graves' canned response to the clear evidence that they were murdered would be "How many really bad guys were involved in the planning of these hundreds of murders and staging them to look like suicides by fire and poisoning?" The victims were originally thought to have died in a mass suicide by fire and poisoning, but it was later discovered that over 400 victims were strangled, stabbed, and then buried in nearby pits. But Graves would ignore this evidence and keep implying that the cult members could not have been murdered because the crime would have required an impossibly large conspiracy.

Would it have necessitated the altering of photographs, X-rays, and films?

Online Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1872
Mr. Griffith says there are disinformation agents right now covering up for the CIA's (or whoever he believes today did it) assassination. Yes, today. And that the media is being controlled or used to cover the conspiracy up as a continuation of the Operation Mockingbir*d program. That's the CIA. Again, all of this being done right now.

He has multiple generations of Americans involved in his conspiracy, one taking place over more than half a century. Agents doing this in 1963 and 1973 and 1983 and 1993 and on and on. But he insists it was only a small group of people who pulled off the conspiracy behind the assassination of JFK. The planning, the execution, the coverup. The films that were taken, the photos that were altered, the autopsy material that was falsified. How did they steal this material? Who? And then altered it? The same people? Then all of this was covered up. Just 20 or 30 people did all of this. Over decades?

Who is ordering these agents to do this? Who is making these decisions? Why wouldn't these agents expose this? Or say no? Or something? We are talking about two or three generations of people. Any original masterminds behind the assassination are long gone. They were replaced. And these replacements are covering up what happened? Why? For what reason? How does this go?

In what world can this happen?
« Last Edit: June 04, 2025, 06:50:31 PM by Steve M. Galbraith »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014

  How long was Daddy Joe Kennedy/Organized Crime stealing the 1960 Election kept on the QT? How many people do you think were involved in that? Why do you think the military was running around forcing anyone remotely connected to them to sign a NDA after the assassination? This "stuff" Does happen and one way or the other, people Do keep their yap shut.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
How long was Daddy Joe Kennedy/Organized Crime stealing the 1960 Election kept on the QT? How many people do you think were involved in that? Why do you think the military was running around forcing anyone remotely connected to them to sign a NDA after the assassination? This "stuff" Does happen and one way or the other, people Do keep their yap shut.

Storing,

I sure wish you would.

Offline Michael T. Griffith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1529
    • JFK Assassination Website
Mr. Griffith says there are disinformation agents right now covering up for the CIA's (or whoever he believes today did it) assassination. Yes, today. And that the media is being controlled or used to cover the conspiracy up as a continuation of the Operation Mockingbir*d program. That's the CIA. Again, all of this being done right now.

Say what???!!! You must have me confused with someone else. I seriously doubt that Operation Mockingbird is still active.

He has multiple generations of Americans involved in his conspiracy, one taking place over more than half a century. Agents doing this in 1963 and 1973 and 1983 and 1993 and on and on. But he insists it was only a small group of people who pulled off the conspiracy behind the assassination of JFK. The planning, the execution, the coverup. The films that were taken, the photos that were altered, the autopsy material that was falsified. How did they steal this material? Who? And then altered it? The same people? Then all of this was covered up. Just 20 or 30 people did all of this. Over decades?

A giant strawman that bears no resemblance to the cover-up that I've posited. Most of the suppression and alteration was done very soon after the assassination, not over the course of decades.

Who is ordering these agents to do this? Who is making these decisions? Why wouldn't these agents expose this? Or say no? Or something?

Some of them did! I take it you have never read Larry Hancock's book Someone Would Have Talked. However, most of them just followed orders and didn't think anything of it because they weren't aware of the implications and reasons behind what they had done, just like in many other documented cases of conspiracy and cover-up. Heard of Iran-Contra? Most of the government personnel and contractors who were involved in Iran-Contra had no idea they were facilitating an illegal arms-for-hostages plot.

We are talking about two or three generations of people. Any original masterminds behind the assassination are long gone. They were replaced. And these replacements are covering up what happened? Why? For what reason? How does this go? In what world can this happen?

Certainly not in your fantasy world. You conjure up a giant strawman scenario and then proceed from there. But you never try to explain the hard scientific evidence that proves the autopsy x-rays were altered, that proves the autopsy report was falsified, that proves that the ammo that hit JFK's head could not have been FMJ ammo, that proves that the SBT is fiction, that proves that the brain in the autopsy brain photos could not be JFK's brain, that proves the 6.5 mm object was ghosted onto the AP x-ray, etc., etc. Autopsy skull x-rays do not alter themselves. Brains do not go missing by themselves. Autopsy reports don't go through four drafts by themselves. FMJ bullets do not magically deposit fragments on the outer table of the skull when they strike the skull, and those fragments don't magically move around by themselves so that they're not even at the point of impact. Fragment trails do not disappear by themselves. Fragment trails don't fabricate their own non-existence. Ghosted images made to look like bullet fragments don't magically appear by themselves. Autopsy skull x-rays don't magically acquire a ghosted image made to look like a bullet fragment by themselves.