JFK's Dramatic Z226-232 Reaction: More Proof that the SBT Is a Silly Myth

[Royell Storing]

  Anybody can "exaggerate" anything. So what?  Euins was very demonstrative with his verbal POW...............POW/POW as he judo chopped down on that pedestal. Personally, I believe that the real value of Euins is the route he used to arrive inside the railroad yard where Officer Harkness found him and loaded him onto the back of his DPD 3 Wheel Motorcycle. Euins walked somewhere along the Elm St Ext. This puts him within a stones throw of those "Wide Open", (DPD Officer Luke Mooney), Huge Gates. Euins might have been there at a time when Shooter(s)/Spotter(s) were exiting the TSBD and passing through those Gates, spilling onto the Elm St Ext, and mixing into the crowd. Euins would have been there at a point in time AFTER DPD Officer Smith ran by the "Wide Open" Huge Gates on the Couch Film. What Euins possibly saw as he walked to the railroad yard is his real value. It would be hard for Euins to miss seeing those Huge Gates with those Very Bright Placards on each gate. My best guess is each Huge Gate was roughly 8' by 12'. ( The 3 Tramps Photo).   

[Tom Graves]

Anybody can "exaggerate" anything. So what?  Euins was very demonstrative with his verbal POW...............POW/POW as he judo chopped down on that pedestal. Personally, I believe that the real value of Euins is the route he used to arrive inside the railroad yard where Officer Harkness found him and loaded him onto the back of his DPD 3 Wheel Motorcycle. Euins walked somewhere along the Elm St Ext. This puts him within a stones throw of those "Wide Open", (DPD Officer Luke Mooney), Huge Gates. Euins might have been there at a time when Shooter(s)/Spotter(s) were exiting the TSBD and were spilling onto the Elm St Ext and mixing into the crowd. Euins would have been there at a point in time AFTER DPD Officer Smith ran by the "Wide Open" Huge Gates on the Couch Film. What Euins possibly saw as he walked to the railroad yard is his real value. It would be hard for Euins to miss seeing those Huge Gates with those Very Bright Placards on each gate. My best guess is each Huge Gate was roughly 8' by 12'.   

Storing,

My guess is that you've been zombified by sixty-six years of KGB*-encouraged and/or created disinformation (including Jim Garrison's On the Trail of the Assassins, Jim Marrs' Crossfire: The Plot that Killed Kennedy, and Comrade Oliver Stone's self-described mythological ("to counter the myth of the Warren Report") movie, "JFK," not to mention the Sun Tzu-like "active measures" and mole-based strategic deception counterintelligence operations it started waging against us and our NATO allies in 1959.

BTW, you never did answer my question:

How many bad guys and really, really bad gals do you figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, the escaping, and the all-important cover up?

Just a few, or oodles and gobs?

*Today's SVR and FSB

[Tom Graves]

Euins might have been there [on the Elm Street Extension] at a time when Shooter(s)/Spotter(s) were exiting the TSBD and passing through those Gates, spilling onto the Elm St Ext, and mixing into the crowd.

Storing,

WHAT shooters and/or spotters?

[Royell Storing]

Storing,

WHAT shooters and/or spotters?

   Take the time to read Officer Luke Mooney's WC Testimony. Then get back to me. I feel like I am taking advantage of you.

[Tom Graves]

Take the time to read Officer Luke Mooney's WC Testimony. Then get back to me. I feel like I am taking advantage of you.

Storing,

When are you going to finally answer my questions?

1) How many bad guys and really, really bad gals to you figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, the escaping, and the all-important cover up? Just a few, or oodles and gobs?

2) Does Vladimir Putin pay you, or do you do it for free?

[Michael T. Griffith]

Storing, When are you going to finally answer my questions?

1) How many bad guys and really, really bad gals to you figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, the escaping, and the all-important cover up? Just a few, or oodles and gobs?

Take the time to read Officer Luke Mooney's WC Testimony. Then get back to me. I feel like I am taking advantage of you.

Asking these questions over and over appears to be Graves' way to avoid discussing evidence he can't explain or doesn't understand.

It's as if we were discussing the case of the 778 Uganda cult members who died in 2000. The incident was originally thought to be a case of mass suicide but was later ruled to be a case of mass murder. Graves' canned response to the clear evidence that they were murdered would be "How many really bad guys were involved in the planning of these hundreds of murders and staging them to look like suicides by fire and poisoning?" The victims were originally thought to have died in a mass suicide by fire and poisoning, but it was later discovered that over 400 victims were strangled, stabbed, and then buried in nearby pits. But Graves would ignore this evidence and keep implying that the cult members could not have been murdered because the crime would have required an impossibly large conspiracy.

[Tom Graves]

Asking these questions over and over appears to be Graves' way to avoid discussing evidence he can't explain or doesn't understand.

It's as if we were discussing the case of the 778 Uganda cult members who died in 2000. The incident was originally thought to be a case of mass suicide but was later ruled to be a case of mass murder. Graves' canned response to the clear evidence that they were murdered would be "How many really bad guys were involved in the planning of these hundreds of murders and staging them to look like suicides by fire and poisoning?" The victims were originally thought to have died in a mass suicide by fire and poisoning, but it was later discovered that over 400 victims were strangled, stabbed, and then buried in nearby pits. But Graves would ignore this evidence and keep implying that the cult members could not have been murdered because the crime would have required an impossibly large conspiracy.

Would it have necessitated the altering of photographs, X-rays, and films?

[Steve M. Galbraith]

Mr. Griffith says there are disinformation agents right now covering up for the CIA's (or whoever he believes today did it) assassination. Yes, today. And that the media is being controlled or used to cover the conspiracy up as a continuation of the Operation Mockingbir*d program. That's the CIA. Again, all of this being done right now.

He has multiple generations of Americans involved in his conspiracy, one taking place over more than half a century. Agents doing this in 1963 and 1973 and 1983 and 1993 and on and on. But he insists it was only a small group of people who pulled off the conspiracy behind the assassination of JFK. The planning, the execution, the coverup. The films that were taken, the photos that were altered, the autopsy material that was falsified. How did they steal this material? Who? And then altered it? The same people? Then all of this was covered up. Just 20 or 30 people did all of this. Over decades?

Who is ordering these agents to do this? Who is making these decisions? Why wouldn't these agents expose this? Or say no? Or something? We are talking about two or three generations of people. Any original masterminds behind the assassination are long gone. They were replaced. And these replacements are covering up what happened? Why? For what reason? How does this go?

In what world can this happen?