Rosemary Willis: conspiracy theorist

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Rosemary Willis: conspiracy theorist  (Read 18502 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5046
Re: Rosemary Willis: conspiracy theorist
« Reply #21 on: December 29, 2023, 09:28:58 PM »
  John - Not sure where you are getting my claiming the Willis 5 Photo was "altered". I never made that claim. We have an obvious Mystery here as these images do contradict each other. You are going the easy route and Assuming Willis 5 has been altered as it is the only image that shows 2 MEN on The Steps. Try to keep an open mind when pondering issues such as this.The validity of a piece of evidence is Not solely determined by quantity. Also, be sure and take the time to read through Testimony. I'll help you out here and direct you to Emmett Hudson's WC testimony regarding how many people he saw standing on The Steps. You can thank me later. 
« Last Edit: December 29, 2023, 10:07:30 PM by Royell Storing »

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5140
Re: Rosemary Willis: conspiracy theorist
« Reply #22 on: December 29, 2023, 10:40:03 PM »
  John - Not sure where you are getting my claiming the Willis 5 Photo was "altered".

The only way there is 3 Men standing on The Steps in Willis 5 is if Man #3 is currently on the Cutting Room Floor.

You can't have it both ways, either you believe that Willis' photo was altered or Muchmore's film and Moorman's photo were altered?

Or the very much more sane approach is that nothing was altered and as Duncan and myself have repeatedly pointed out, that some of Hudson is being obscured by the younger man in front.

JohnM

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5046
Re: Rosemary Willis: conspiracy theorist
« Reply #23 on: December 29, 2023, 11:14:21 PM »
You can't have it both ways, either you believe that Willis' photo was altered or Muchmore's film and Moorman's photo were altered?

Or the very much more sane approach is that nothing was altered and as Duncan and myself have repeatedly pointed out, that some of Hudson is being obscured by the younger man in front.

JohnM

    Take a look at Hudson's WC Testimony. Hudson NEVER mentions a 3rd person on The Steps. Only HUDSON and another MAN = 2 MEN on The Steps. The Willis 5 pic + Emmett Hudson's WC Testimony of 2 Men on The Steps contradict the images showing 3 Men in this same position. I think that Hudson is the only assassination eyewitness to ever Testify as to how many people were standing on The Steps as the JFK Limo came down Elm St. Hudson was standing right there, he should know. Hudson's WC Testimony + Willis 5 seriously calls into question other images showing 3 Men standing on The Steps. I've never seen a photograph of Hudson. Are we Certain which of the men pictured on The Steps is Hudson? If we are to believe Hudson is the Man wearing the light colored slacks, then Hudson had 1 Man at his elbow and another Man standing closely in front of him. There's no way Hudson could possibly miss seeing these other 2 Men.   

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5140
Re: Rosemary Willis: conspiracy theorist
« Reply #24 on: December 29, 2023, 11:24:58 PM »

    Take a look at Hudson's WC Testimony. Hudson NEVER mentions a 3rd person on The Steps. Only HUDSON and another MAN = 2 MEN on The Steps.

Please post the WC Testimony in which Hudson specifically says that there was only two men on the steps? Thanks in advance.

JohnM

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5046
Re: Rosemary Willis: conspiracy theorist
« Reply #25 on: December 30, 2023, 12:53:10 AM »
Please post the WC Testimony in which Hudson specifically says that there was only two men on the steps? Thanks in advance.

JohnM

     Here we have another Old Guard JFK Researcher that simply will Not trouble himself with Eyewitness Testimony. In my opinion, this is why there are so many remaining questions surrounding the JFK Assassination 60 years later. There's NO excuse for it dating back, and no excuse for it Now.

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5140
Re: Rosemary Willis: conspiracy theorist
« Reply #26 on: December 30, 2023, 01:19:27 AM »
     Here we have another Old Guard JFK Researcher that simply will Not trouble himself with Eyewitness Testimony. In my opinion, this is why there are so many remaining questions surrounding the JFK Assassination 60 years later. There's NO excuse for it dating back, and no excuse for it Now.

As an "Old Guard JFK Researcher" who has access to the Warren Commission Report and the entire 26 volumes of Warren Commission evidence, I have no need to play your juvenile games, now I will calmly repeat my initial question which you have unsuccessfully failed to avoid, "Please post the WC Testimony in which Hudson specifically says that there was only two men on the steps?"

JohnM

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5046
Re: Rosemary Willis: conspiracy theorist
« Reply #27 on: December 30, 2023, 01:46:09 PM »
As an "Old Guard JFK Researcher" who has access to the Warren Commission Report and the entire 26 volumes of Warren Commission evidence, I have no need to play your juvenile games, now I will calmly repeat my initial question which you have unsuccessfully failed to avoid, "Please post the WC Testimony in which Hudson specifically says that there was only two men on the steps?"

JohnM

     JOHN - I have Willis 5 + the WC Testimony of Emmett Hudson corroborating 2 MEN on The Steps. You have distorted an assassination image beyond recognition and attached your own concocted story to it. This is where you guys currently reside after Knott Labs Laser SCIENCE declared that the, "SBT IS IMPOSSIBLE".  Unabashed JFK assassination image distortion with uncorroborated and blatantly made-up stories attached. You "researchers" now have Zero Credibility. NONE!