The Walker Case

[Charles Collins]

I'm content with viewing LHO as a potential suspect in the Walker shooting based on her testimony.

But I also stand by my view that there's no evidence that places Oswald at the scene of the crime on April 10th 1963 because there's no evidence.

But I also stand by my view that there's no evidence that places Oswald at the scene of the crime on April 10th 1963 because there's no evidence.


You have been shown the evidence over and over and over again. It does place LHO at the crime scene. You can believe otherwise if you want. But claiming that there is no evidence is flat out false.

[Jon Banks]

Wrong again, “Richard”. It was (supposedly) found in a Russian “book of helpful instructions” on Ruth Paine’s bookshelf.

She brought the book to the Secret Service with Marina's other belongings and they found the note in the book.

Not saying it was planted but there were plenty of opportunities to do so under those circumstances.

[Jon Banks]

But I also stand by my view that there's no evidence that places Oswald at the scene of the crime on April 10th 1963 because there's no evidence.


You have been shown the evidence over and over and over again. It does place LHO at the crime scene. You can believe otherwise if you want. But claiming that there is no evidence is flat out false.

Base on your response, I don't think you understand the differences between physical and metaphysical evidence 

It requires no belief or speculation on my part to acknowledge that direct evidence connecting LHO to the crime scene doesn't exist or has never been found.

[John Iacoletti]

That’s your very biased opinion. Sorry but you would be very unlikely to serve on the jury based on your bias.

The biased person is the one who thinks an unsigned, undated note in Russian that doesn’t mention Walker or shooting must be about shooting Walker.

[John Iacoletti]

The conspiracy theorists or those who absurdly claim "show me where I said I was a conspiracy theorist" go all out to defend a person who defected to the enemy at the height of the Cold War and when rejected, hacked into his own wrist which caused massive blood loss and required stitches to repair, the same guy who in a letter to his brother Robert said he was willing to KILL any American, ANY American, the same guy who while in the marines shot himself in the elbow. He also hit his wife!

Is this rant supposed to be evidence that he killed the president or took a shot at Walker?

[John Iacoletti]

It is an official FBI report that the WC asked for, received, and accepted into the record.

Is that supposed to make it something other than third-hand hearsay in an anonymously written letter? We already have Bardwell Odum on record as saying that another part of this anonymously written letter was incorrect when it claimed he showed another piece of evidence to certain people.

[Charles Collins]

Base on your response, I don't think you understand the differences between physical and metaphysical evidence 

It requires no belief or speculation on my part to acknowledge that direct evidence connecting LHO to the crime scene doesn't exist or has never been found.

Marina’s testimony is direct evidence (per the definition in the instructions to the jury that have already been posted in this thread) that LHO confessed to her to taking a shot at Walker on the night of the incident. Marina is an eyewitness to LHO’s confession. The physical evidence supports Marina’s testimony.

The bullet recovered from Walker’s house is direct probative evidence connecting LHO to the crime scene. The experts say that it is completely consistent with a Carcano bullet fired from the rifle found on the sixth floor. And that there are five identifying marks on that bullet that match that specific rifle. Eight identifying marks are what the FBI standards are, but the New York standards only require five identifying marks to exclude all other firearms in the world. The FBI experts therefore state that it very likely came from that rifle. Combine the probabilities of all the evidence (as a jury is required to do). LHO’s confession, the note, Marina’s testimony, the bullet, the photos of Walker’s house, etc.  There is no reasonable doubt (aka: evidence that LHO was not at the scene). And a jury is required to make their conclusions based on the evidence, they are not allowed to consider conjecture. The verdict should be guilty without question.