The Walker Case

[John Iacoletti]

This is another example of the naysayers apparently accepting information without authentication. Yet they submit (based on nothing but lame excuses and speculation) that the evidence against LHO wasn’t properly authenticated. 

There are no excuses or speculation involved. You can either authenticate the evidence or you cannot.

[Charles Collins]

There are no excuses or speculation involved. You can either authenticate the evidence or you cannot.

The lame excuses of it is possible it could have been planted or faked are exactly what is said.

[Jon Banks]

Except it isn’t. The “physical evidence” tells you nothing about anybody shooting Walker. The only basis for that is Marina’s claim about what Lee told her.

Maybe Charles meant "metaphysical evidence" 

[Charles Collins]

Except it isn’t. The “physical evidence” tells you nothing about anybody shooting Walker. The only basis for that is Marina’s claim about what Lee told her.

Another snip from the jury instructions:

There are two kinds of evidence: direct and circumstantial. Direct evidence is direct proof of a fact, such as testimony of an eyewitness. Circumstantial evi- dence is proof of facts from which you may infer or conclude that other facts exist.

[Charles Collins]

Are you aware that this is third-hand hearsay in an anonymously written letter?

Are you aware that Don McElroy said it was he and not Norvell who found and picked up the Walker bullet?

It is an official FBI report that the WC asked for, received, and accepted into the record.

[Jon Banks]

Again, Marina’s testimony definitely links LHO to the crime. The note, the photos, and the bullet recovered from Walker’s house are all highly probative evidence that links LHO to the crime. And the evidence all supports one another.

I'm content with viewing LHO as a potential suspect in the Walker shooting based on her testimony.

But I also stand by my view that there's no evidence that places Oswald at the scene of the crime on April 10th 1963 because there's no evidence.

[John Iacoletti]

There is no proof that Oswald wrote the letter?  It was found among his possessions. 

Wrong again, “Richard”. It was (supposedly) found in a Russian “book of helpful instructions” on Ruth Paine’s bookshelf.