Is the amount of effort to link Oswald to Hidell believable?

[John Mytton]

and the usual impotent attempt to shift the burden to try to salvage a failed argument.

No, the thread in which you have decided to participate is asking a clear concise question "Is the amount of effort to link Oswald to Hidell believable?" and instead of answering my innocent question it is you who is "shifting the burden" away from any reasonable reply. But keep running and thus positively reinforce my basic premise that linking Oswald's usage of the Hidell ID required an unrealistic mountain of forgery, planting evidence in obscure places and a stack of lies.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

No, the thread in which you have decided to participate is asking a clear concise question "Is the amount of effort to link Oswald to Hidell believable?" and instead of answering my innocent question it is you who is "shifting the burden" away from any reasonable reply.

It’s one of your usual loaded questions. As I pointed out ages ago, you have failed to show that Oswald ever used Hidell as an alias for himself. You just assumed that he did, and then invented a massive conspiracy as the only alternative. The only “effort” required is for somebody like you to write up a paragraph containing a fallacious argument.

[John Mytton]

It’s one of your usual loaded questions. As I pointed out ages ago, you have failed to show that Oswald ever used Hidell as an alias for himself. You just assumed that he did, and then invented a massive conspiracy as the only alternative. The only “effort” required is for somebody like you to write up a paragraph containing a fallacious argument.

and then invented a massive conspiracy as the only alternative.

Thanks John, that's it in a nutshell. I asked for you and any other member, to essentially provide an alternative to a conspiracy and so far you and team conspiracy are failing miserably.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

“Failing” defined as not fitting your false dichotomy?

The alternative is that Hidell was not Lee Oswald. No massive conspiracy necessary. Particularly when there is very little reason to assume that Hidell was Lee Oswald.

[John Mytton]

The alternative is that Hidell was not Lee Oswald. No massive conspiracy necessary. Particularly when there is very little reason to assume that Hidell was Lee Oswald.

Oh, so there was another "Hidell" who wrote with the same style and structure as Oswald and had his mail directed to Oswald's PO BOX?
And also ordered rifles to Oswald's PO Box
And also ordered revolvers to Oswald's PO Box
And also had Identification made up with Oswald's photo
And also made Oswald carry the Hidell ID
And also stored the negatives that created the Hidell ID in the Paine garage
And also made Law enforcement lie to say Oswald admitted carrying the Hidell ID

And logically by extension, since nothing needed altering or planting, this means that the Hidell rifle order for C2766 was legitimate and was sent to Oswald's PO Box!




Btw I can now understand why you kept this fanciful revelation safely hidden away. HILARIOUS!

JohnhM

[John Iacoletti]

Oh, so there was another "Hidell" who wrote with the same style and structure as Oswald and had his mail directed to Oswald's PO BOX?
And also ordered rifles to Oswald's PO Box
And also ordered revolvers to Oswald's PO Box
And also had Identification made up with Oswald's photo
And also made Oswald carry the Hidell ID
And also stored the negatives that created the Hidell ID in the Paine garage
And also made Law enforcement lie to say Oswald admitted carrying the Hidell ID

Yawn, another strawman.

Stop this desperate shifting the burden act. You can either prove Oswald used Hidell as an alias for himself or you cannot. And you cannot. Nobody has to prove your silly made-up vast conspiracy in order for you to be wrong.

And logically by extension, since nothing needed altering or planting, this means that the Hidell rifle order for C2766 was legitimate and was sent to Oswald's PO Box!

You wouldn’t know “logic” if it bit you in the azz. And you still have no evidence that C2766 or any other rifle was “sent to Oswald’s PO box”.

[John Mytton]

Stop this desperate shifting the burden act.

Sorry John, but you not me made the following poorly thought out claim and now after I pointed out the massive flaws in your logic, you are back pedalling real fast.

The alternative is that Hidell was not Lee Oswald.

Any more bright ideas? LOL!!!

JohnM