Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Umbrella Man: Suspicious  (Read 20426 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #200 on: August 17, 2022, 03:18:53 AM »
Advertisement
I will. Right after I dine on the self-righteous indignation of cowardly clown-boys.

'dine on the self-righteous indignation'
_ LOL. That terminology in itself is self-righteous.
   Hahahahahahahaha!

Now, where does a foxhole atheist like you get to borrow Romans 2:1-5?
Although, plagiarism does suits you.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2022, 03:20:36 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #200 on: August 17, 2022, 03:18:53 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #201 on: August 17, 2022, 05:09:53 AM »
'dine on the self-righteous indignation'
_ LOL. That terminology in itself is self-righteous.
   Hahahahahahahaha!

Now, where does a foxhole atheist like you get to borrow Romans 2:1-5?
Although, plagiarism does suits you.

What are you babbling about now? I borrowed nothing of the kind.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #202 on: August 17, 2022, 10:47:41 AM »
What are you babbling about now? I borrowed nothing of the kind.

Hahahaha
Since when would you ever come up with a term like 'dine on the self-righteous indignation' on your own?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #202 on: August 17, 2022, 10:47:41 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #203 on: August 17, 2022, 01:18:13 PM »
Hahahaha
Since when would you ever come up with a term like 'dine on the self-righteous indignation' on your own?

Since when have you ever been right about anything?  Besides, there's nothing even remotely similar to that in the bible verses you cited.  Nice try though.  It's hilarious watching you try to be relevant, when you're not obsessively making and posting "clever" graphics that nobody ever responds to and derailing threads with your constant trolling.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2022, 02:04:34 PM by John Iacoletti »

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3725
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #204 on: August 17, 2022, 03:39:14 PM »

 The contradiction you always conveniently ignore----


So? Baker corrects a page so it matches his testimony months before. 
So? ?
So that "correction" probably indicates a cover up in order to match anything that shows that Oswald apparently did not haul ass down the staircase as theorized to indicate a lone assassin. SO...Baker was told to scratch it out. That written statement... also probably.. was entered into the records by accident.
And you just admitted it ???
Oswald was casually gulping a soda [doesn't matter Coke or Dr P] when he was confronted by Baker [wherever that was]

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #204 on: August 17, 2022, 03:39:14 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #205 on: August 17, 2022, 04:00:01 PM »
Since when have you ever been right about anything?  Besides, there's nothing even remotely similar to that in the bible verses you cited.  Nice try though.  It's hilarious watching you try to be relevant, when you're not obsessively making and posting "clever" graphics that nobody ever responds to and derailing threads with your constant trolling.

> Self righteous is what the Bible reference is all about
> I'm right about you being the biggest Oswald Arse Kisser ever
> Show us were my support of the WC is 'trolling'
> 'Nobody ever responds to'
    18,000 views and counting

All creative people are obsessive
« Last Edit: August 17, 2022, 04:03:08 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2277
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #206 on: August 17, 2022, 04:03:49 PM »
So? ?
So that "correction" probably indicates a cover up in order to match anything that shows that Oswald apparently did not haul ass down the staircase as theorized to indicate a lone assassin. SO...Baker was told to scratch it out. That written statement... also probably.. was entered into the records by accident.
And you just admitted it ???

Where did I say it was a "cover up"?

Let's see. A massive cover-up, per you, is being conducted and rather than rewrite the Baker statement and have him sign it again, they just enter the inflammatory document into the record. Your explanation is that the incriminating document was preserved "probably by accident."

What I think happened was that one of the FBI men filled out the statement and went to Baker, maybe when Baker was on duty and pressed for time, and got him to review it before signing. The agent was going by some speculative news report (not a "cover-up playbook") that Oswald had the Coke in hand. Roy Truly had a similar handwritten statement that he signed; the statements were simply used to support the WC finding that Oswald was in the second-floor lunchroom alone when encountered by Baker and Truly.

Quote
Oswald was casually gulping a soda [doesn't matter Coke or Dr P] when he was confronted by Baker [wherever that was]

Not what Truly and Baker testified to. Where they part of the "cover-up" and kept true to the "story" for their whole lives?
« Last Edit: August 17, 2022, 08:53:29 PM by Jerry Organ »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #206 on: August 17, 2022, 04:03:49 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #207 on: August 17, 2022, 07:04:01 PM »
You never stated a case.

The case states itself: You taking a knee at Oswald's grave.... that's it, thats the punch line