Umbrella Man: Suspicious

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Umbrella Man: Suspicious  (Read 6198 times)

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3711
  • Skeptic
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #140 on: August 10, 2022, 12:05:20 AM »
The Loons think it inconceivable that a conservative protestor living in Dallas at that time would be so extreme to show up with an umbrella to tie Kennedy to "appeasement" of international Communism.

"By early 1963, Dallas was the most singular city in America-it had become, without question, the roiling headquarters for the angry, absolutist resistance to John F. Kennedy and his administration.

A confederacy of like-minded men had coalesced in Dallas: the anti-Catholic leader of the largest Baptist congregation in America, the far-right media magnate who published the state's leading newspaper, the most ideologically extreme member of Congress, and the wealthiest man in the world-oilman H.L. Hunt. Together they formed the most vitriolic anti-Kennedy movement in the nation. And they began to attract others who were even more extreme to the city."

The American Prospect ( Link )

On the day of the assassination, there were the "Wanted for Treason" posters and newspaper ad. There was the "Impreach Earl Warren" billboard and Edwin Walker. The whole city probably thought all Easterners and West Coasters drank baby blood, lived in mansions and had Guatemalan illegals working free as house staff.
The Loons huh? Well that leaves me out because I have been posting this very idea since I joined up here.
H L Hunt...hated Kennedy
His pals LBJ, J E Hoover, Earl Cabell, Henry Wade [and certain Dallas Police did too]
The crime bosses hated JFK, certain in military, CIA, anti-Castro Cubans, also.
They were the stew that produced the ambush. If you believe Witt then see where he testified that the shots went off like a string of firecrackers.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #140 on: August 10, 2022, 12:05:20 AM »

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1919
  • Halifax - Canada
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #141 on: August 10, 2022, 12:25:48 AM »
The Loons huh? Well that leaves me out because I have been posting this very idea since I joined up here.

I take it, then, that you're OK with "a conservative protestor living in Dallas at that time would be so extreme to show up with an umbrella to tie Kennedy to "appeasement" of international Communism." Or do you find that inconceivable like the Loons?

Quote
H L Hunt...hated Kennedy
His pals LBJ, J E Hoover, Earl Cabell, Henry Wade [and certain Dallas Police did too]
The crime bosses hated JFK, certain in military, CIA, anti-Castro Cubans, also.
They were the stew that produced the ambush. If you believe Witt then see where he testified that the shots went off like a string of firecrackers.

"Ambush?" Doesn't that make you a mind-made-up Conspiracy Theorist? I don't know what, if any, LN evidence you've given fair consideration.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #141 on: August 10, 2022, 12:25:48 AM »

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3711
  • Skeptic
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #142 on: August 10, 2022, 05:01:34 AM »
 

"Ambush?" Doesn't that make you a mind-made-up Conspiracy Theorist? I don't know what, if any, LN evidence you've given fair consideration.
Ambush--- an act or instance of lying concealed so as to attack by surprise; an act or instance of attacking unexpectedly from a concealed position. 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #142 on: August 10, 2022, 05:01:34 AM »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6402
  • 'Pristine'..yeah, sure
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #143 on: August 10, 2022, 02:38:15 PM »
Ambush, as in 'surprise attack' is the word I introduced to describe Oswald's actions regarding Kennedy and Tippit.
I also used 'in cold blood' (without feeling or mercy; ruthlessly) especially regarding Tippit

Stay tuned for further
word-nourishment, kiddies



 ;) ;) ;)
« Last Edit: August 10, 2022, 02:38:51 PM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #143 on: August 10, 2022, 02:38:15 PM »

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3711
  • Skeptic
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #144 on: August 10, 2022, 04:10:38 PM »
Ambush, as in 'surprise attack' is the word I introduced ... actions regarding Kennedy and Tippit...Stay tuned for further
word-nourishment.
Mr Chapman usurps all and claims the original formulation of the word ambush re Nov 22  ::)
Actually...Officer Tippit was not ambushed per se. No one was hiding behind a tree or bush.
The policeman [according to Ms Markham] was in full view of his assailant.
Further...according to her testimony....Officer Tippit probably knew his attacker.
We can most likely get more word nourishment from a pencil eraser.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #144 on: August 10, 2022, 04:10:38 PM »

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3509
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #145 on: August 10, 2022, 05:56:36 PM »
Mr Chapman usurps all and claims the original formulation of the word ambush re Nov 22  ::)
Actually...Officer Tippit was not ambushed per se. No one was hiding behind a tree or bush.
The policeman [according to Ms Markham] was in full view of his assailant.
Further...according to her testimony....Officer Tippit probably knew his attacker.
We can most likely get more word nourishment from a pencil eraser.

The irony of this line of logic.  It also means that Oswald was not hiding when he murdered Tippit.  He did it in plain sight in the presence of numerous witnesses who confirmed that he was the person who pulled the trigger.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #145 on: August 10, 2022, 05:56:36 PM »

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9803
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #146 on: August 10, 2022, 07:01:18 PM »
The usual “Richard Smith”  BS:

There weren’t “numerous witnesses” who saw anybody pull a trigger.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #146 on: August 10, 2022, 07:01:18 PM »

Online Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7180
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #147 on: August 10, 2022, 07:11:18 PM »
The usual “Richard Smith”  BS:

There weren’t “numerous witnesses” who saw anybody pull a trigger.

Mr "Smith" never lets the facts stand in his way....

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #147 on: August 10, 2022, 07:11:18 PM »

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3711
  • Skeptic
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #148 on: August 11, 2022, 07:27:39 PM »
Back to the Umbrella Man...First to last visible frame of the umbrella by the road sign.
Appears to rise straight up unhindered.....



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #148 on: August 11, 2022, 07:27:39 PM »

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3509
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #149 on: August 11, 2022, 07:57:11 PM »
Mr "Smith" never lets the facts stand in his way....

Witness hears a BANG from a gunshot - witness looks toward the sound of the gunshot and sees LHO standing there with a gun in his hand.  No other person with a gun is visible in the vicinity of the shooting.  What logical inference can be drawn for this situation here on planet Earth?  And, of course, a witness did literally see him pull the trigger.   It's a slam dunk of guilt.  If there were any doubt, Oswald is arrested a short distance away after resisting arrest.  He has a gun and the same two brand of ammo in his possession as were used to kill Tippit.  What are the odds?  LHO looks exactly like the killer.  He is in both the building from which JFK is assassinated and street that Tippit is murdered.  He has the same ammo as the Tippit killer.  He is acting so suspiciously that he draws the attention of a random citizen.  But he there is doubt according to our contrarians because multiple witnesses didn't see him "pull the trigger."  They just saw him at the murder scene with his gun drawn.  LOL.  That comes as great news for John Wilkes Booth.

 

Mobile View