Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Bogus evidence of bogus evidence.....  (Read 8469 times)

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Bogus evidence of bogus evidence.....
« on: July 05, 2022, 08:07:29 AM »
Advertisement
 The Hunt letter revisited


Of course it is probably a copy of a 21st generation copy.
  ...a note supposedly written by Oswald and addressed to a "Mr. Hunt" that surfaced during the HSCA investigation. It supposedly ties Oswald to either CIA agent E. Howard Hunt or to Texas oilman H.L. Hunt. The HSCA gave the document to its panel of handwriting experts and their report is regarded as very skeptical. In 1999, the note was revealed to be a Soviet forgery in a book by KGB defector Vasili Mitrokhin. Here is the section of the book that describes the KGB’s involvement with Kennedy assassination disinformation....  https://www.jfk-online.com/mitrokhin.html
 
Why would the KGB forge a kakamimi note like this...not even specifying what "Mr Hunt" was the recipient?

Quote
The implication, clearly, was that Oswald wanted to meet Hunt before going ahead with the assassination.
That implication was oh so clear to master Warren apologist John C McAdams but remains rather murky to me.
I mean which side of the political spectrum was Oswald suppose to be on anyway?
He goes [supposedly] after Gen Walker [a righty]...after JFK [supposedly] [a lefty]             
 The FBI seemed to have no problem ascribing who "Mr Hunt" is-------
 
 The apparent origin of the letter was traced to John W. Curington who was a confident and attorney of record to H L Hunt.

Quote
Authenticity of Letter By EARL GOLZ
   
The FBI cannot determine whether
Lee Harvey Oswald .wrote a letter to a
“Mr. Hunt” two weeks before the assas-
sination of President John F. Kennedy,
a U.S. Justice Department source said
Tuesday.

Three handwriting experts commis-
sioned by The News concluded last
week the letter is “the authentic writ-
ing of Lee Harvey Oswald and was writ-
ten by him.”

The FBI said without the original let-
ter it would be "almost impossible to
certify whether it is genuihe or not,"
the Justice Department source said.

***"And they' (FBI) said^that Oswald
has a childlike handwriting and it's
easily forged,” the source said, "so they
just can't tell.”


The FBI declined to directly com-
ment on the letter's authenticity. In
(964, the FBI repeatedly identified
handwriting on documents as Oswald's
during the Warren Commission inves-
tigation. The agency also determined
in several cases that year that signa-
tures of cranks on guest books around
the country were not Oswald's.

When told of the FBI’s reaction to
the "Mr. Hunt" letter, one of the three
band writing analysts. Mary C. Harri-
son of Richardson, said she didn’t
"know what they mean” by labeling
the script "childlike." ,

"If they (FBI) know anything at all
about handwriting, they can tell that
(he same party wrote that letter,” Mrs.
Harrison said. “There is just no doubt
in my mind. And 1 can prove it by
breaking it down stroke by stroke."
She said handwriting experts "go to
court often on Xerox copies ... I
would go to court on it (Oswald letter)
any day."
Mrs. Harrison and the other two
handwriting analysts who examined
the letter, Mary I. Duncan of Toronto,
Canada, and Allan R. Keown of El Paso,
are among about 100 certified members
of one of the most respected handwrit-
ing organizations in the western hemi-
sphere, the Independent Association of
Questioned Document Examiners.
The terse note, dated Nov. 8, 1963,^
was addressed to "Dear Mr. Hunt" and
signed by "Lee Harvey Oswald." It
asked for "information concerning my
position ... I am suggesting that we
discuss the matter fully before any
steps are taken by me or anyone else.”

Oswald's wife testified before the
Warren Commission, which apparently
didn’t know of the existence of the let-
ter, that Oswald on Nov. 8, 1963, failed
to pay a visit to her, as scheduled, at
the Irving home where she was thep
living.

Oswald told his wife he failed to
show up because "there was another
job open, more interesting work . . .
related to photography," according to
Mrs. Marina Oswald’s testimony before
the Warren Commission in 1964. At the
time he was working at the Texas State
Book Depository Building, from where
the Warren Commission concluded he
triggered the rifle that killed Kennedy.         

Neither the FBI, the HSCA, Penn Jones or Earl Golz attributes the origin of the note to anyone.
If it was Curington...he should have been charged concerning---withholding information from the Federal Government.
***Notice the really funny part?----
The FBI considered Oswald's handwriting too 'childlike' and easy to forge....
 ...but the order forms for weapons allegedly written by him were definitely in his handwriting according to the Report ::) 

JFK Assassination Forum

Bogus evidence of bogus evidence.....
« on: July 05, 2022, 08:07:29 AM »


Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3792
Re: Bogus evidence of bogus evidence.....
« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2022, 02:40:04 PM »
This reminds me of the time when, as kids, we tried to sell some fake Beatles members signatures to the Beatles crazed girl down the street… :D

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Re: Bogus evidence of bogus evidence.....
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2022, 04:59:19 PM »
This reminds me of the time when, as kids, we tried to sell some fake Beatles members signatures to the Beatles crazed girl down the street… :D
Perhaps revealing your questionable scruples there?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bogus evidence of bogus evidence.....
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2022, 04:59:19 PM »


Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3792
Re: Bogus evidence of bogus evidence.....
« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2022, 05:15:15 PM »
Perhaps revealing your questionable scruples there?


Buh, buh, buh, bad to the bone….   8)

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Re: Bogus evidence of bogus evidence.....
« Reply #4 on: July 07, 2022, 12:33:27 AM »
Another find on the McAdams page---
 
Quote
Citizens for Truth in the Kennedy Assassination (CTKA) in 1994 published a document (a police report), supposedly detailing an altercation between Jack Ruby and Lee Oswald at Mrs. Bledsoe’s boarding house. (Why were they fighting? Weren’t they coconspirators?). "A CTKA Story?" is researcher David Perry’s analysis of the document, showing it to be an obvious fake. Since Perry’s article was written, the hoaxers who wrote it have come forward and admitted the forgery. Yet CTKA, Jim Marrs, and Jack White all accepted the document as authentic.
I never heard of this before. Any links to this alleged document were 404'd long ago. So who were these 'hoaxers'?
And how does this prove that Oswald was the assassin?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bogus evidence of bogus evidence.....
« Reply #4 on: July 07, 2022, 12:33:27 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Bogus evidence of bogus evidence.....
« Reply #5 on: July 07, 2022, 12:55:14 AM »

Buh, buh, buh, bad to the bone….   8)

Needs a kind of staccato treatment

>Buhbuhbuhbuhbuhbaaaaaad-to-the-bone

or use hyphens
>Buh-buh-buh-buh-buh-baaaaaad-to-the-bone
« Last Edit: July 07, 2022, 01:00:52 AM by Bill Chapman »

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3792
Re: Bogus evidence of bogus evidence.....
« Reply #6 on: July 07, 2022, 01:13:14 AM »
Needs a kind of staccato treatment

>Buhbuhbuhbuhbuhbaaaaaad-to-the-bone

or use hyphens
>Buh-buh-buh-buh-buh-baaaaaad-to-the-bone


👍

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Re: Bogus evidence of bogus evidence.....
« Reply #7 on: July 07, 2022, 02:47:48 AM »
Needs a kind of staccato treatment
And you need mental health treatment [long overdue]
Then you trolls can go 'bone' each other.
You're letting your panties show on a public forum.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bogus evidence of bogus evidence.....
« Reply #7 on: July 07, 2022, 02:47:48 AM »