Oswald Probably Did It

[John Iacoletti]

I didn't know this was a job Tim. Do they get paid? Where do I sign up? It's just a fun hobby for me Tim. I have been studying the assassination for decades now.

Is that where you learned that Charles Givens was short?

[John Iacoletti]

And in view of the fact that you seem to dispute every bit of evidence against Oswald it would take a small army to coordinate and plant all of this tainted evidence.

You're assuming that this evidence you keeps claiming there is (but won't actually list) actually incriminates Oswald.

[John Iacoletti]

Btw where did you get the notion that I dispute every bit of evidence when I have accepted the BY photos as authentic. You seem to be all the place with wild claims....why is that?

Because he's lazy.  It's a lot easier to argue ridiculous strawmen then to deal with what you actually say.

[Alice Thorton]

Actually, I have been doing extensive research into this and I wasn't a believer in it a first but now I am. Take a look at this website.

 http://spartacus-educational.com/JFKwallaceM.htm

[Tim Nickerson]

Actually, I have been doing extensive research into this and I wasn't a believer in it a first but now I am. Take a look at this website.

 http://spartacus-educational.com/JFKwallaceM.htm

Alice, I must point out to you that the Education site is a very poor source for obtaining accurate information from. About six or seven years ago, I helped my youngest daughter with a school project. I forget if it was on Booker T Washington or George Washington Carver. It may have been both. Anyway, she used the Education site as a source. It turned out the information she used from there was horribly inaccurate. Consider yourself warned.

[Alice Thorton]

Thank you for notifying me of that source. But I have found this source as well where it talks about Attorney Craig Zirbel opinion on Johnson's motive, opportunity, and means. If you have any other websites talking about Johnson's involvement please link away.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/21/jfk-conspiracy-theorist-points-finger-at-lbj/3660765/

[Tim Nickerson]

Thank you for notifying me of that source. But I have found this source as well where it talks about Attorney Craig Zirbel opinion on Johnson's motive, opportunity, and means. If you have any other websites talking about Johnson's involvement please link away.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/21/jfk-conspiracy-theorist-points-finger-at-lbj/3660765/

Zirbel is welcome to his opinion but I more interested in facts than opinion.

[John Mytton]

Thanks Tim.  Finally, an LNer who understands burden of proof.

Sorry Iacoletti but we aren't in court, you aren't Oswald's defence Lawyer, you aren't a Judge and as this websites Forum title says we are here to determine who assassinated JFK therefore it's real simple, if you suggest there was a conspiracy to kill JFK then it's up to you to provide evidence to support a conspiracy.

Iacoletti's fantasy.


Iacoletti's reality




JohnM

[Zeon Wasinsky]

Santa Claus probably does have an elf factory at North pole.

[John Iacoletti]

Sorry Iacoletti but we aren't in court, you aren't Oswald's defence Lawyer, you aren't a Judge and as this websites Forum title says we are here to determine who assassinated JFK therefore it's real simple, if you suggest there was a conspiracy to kill JFK then it's up to you to provide evidence to support a conspiracy.

And Mytton does not understand burden of proof.  It has nothing to do with a courtroom.  I didn't suggest there was a conspiracy.  You however claim that Oswald killed JFK.  It's up to you to provide evidence for your claim instead of demanding that people prove you wrong.