Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Oswald Probably Did It  (Read 19625 times)

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3009
Re: Oswald Probably Did It
« Reply #60 on: March 08, 2018, 01:55:04 AM »

Better but still not entirely accurate. I edited my own post as well.


Better but still not entirely accurate = Not according to your wishes, right?

The fact remains that Bentley mentioned a credit card and a drivers license when he was asked what was in the wallet.

Why would he mention those items if they weren't really there? Did he just make it up?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3392
Re: Oswald Probably Did It
« Reply #61 on: March 08, 2018, 02:53:44 AM »
I am surprised that you got anyone to play your silly game.  Your motive is clear and we have seen this same ?black or white? logical fallacy repeatedly.  If one cannot show compelling evidence that someone other than Oswald did it, then Oswald did it, right?  WRONG!  It is not necessary to provide an alternate shooter to show that Oswald was not the shooter and the burden of proof that Oswald was the shooter rests on those arguing that he was.   Furthermore, since we both know the evidence, have made up our minds, and there is no possible way that either one of us could sway the other, your post is futile.

If one cannot show compelling evidence that someone other than Oswald did it, then Oswald did it, right?  WRONG!
>Show us where I claim that little gem.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3392
Re: Oswald Probably Did It
« Reply #62 on: March 08, 2018, 04:03:59 AM »
If one cannot show compelling evidence that someone other than Oswald did it, then Oswald did it, right?  WRONG!
>Show us where I ever claimed that little gem.

Offline Larry Baldwin

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: Oswald Probably Did It
« Reply #63 on: March 08, 2018, 01:58:33 PM »
If one cannot show compelling evidence that someone other than Oswald did it, then Oswald did it, right?  WRONG!
>Show us where I claim that little gem.

Why should I?  I asked a question.  But don't play stupid now, it is probably what you meant.  I am 100% certain of that (that you probably meant it).  ::)

Offline Wesley Johnson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Oswald Probably Did It
« Reply #64 on: March 08, 2018, 03:55:22 PM »
The point is no one is going to read run-on endless paragraphs. Learn to separate your thoughts.

I don't have to prove LHO's innocence. You have to prove his guilt. Well?


Funny. I looked at one of your posts and you ramble on forever. Learn to separate your thoughts. Actually since this is not a court of law, neither one of us is compelled to prove anything.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8325
Re: Oswald Probably Did It
« Reply #65 on: March 13, 2018, 04:56:04 PM »

Funny. I looked at one of your posts and you ramble on forever. Learn to separate your thoughts. Actually since this is not a court of law, neither one of us is compelled to prove anything.

True enough, but don't you feel like you need good reasons to believe the things you believe?

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3009
Re: Oswald Probably Did It
« Reply #66 on: March 13, 2018, 07:10:32 PM »

Funny. I looked at one of your posts and you ramble on forever. Learn to separate your thoughts. Actually since this is not a court of law, neither one of us is compelled to prove anything.

Actually since this is not a court of law, neither one of us is compelled to prove anything.

So true... as long as it is understood that all concerned are merely expressing opinions rather than making claims like;


I would love to have Oswald in the hot seat at court. At the end of it, I would pin the bag, the rifle, the revolver, the bullet, the fragments, the shell casings, the documents, proving Oswald's ownership of the weapons, and the eye witness testimonies, right to little old Oswaldovich's head. And after the defense, blew all the smoke and put up all the mirrors, the jury would see that they had zero, physical, or ballistic evidence to support their defense. It is hilarious.


Gee... Wesley, did you write that?

Btw.. Any idead why LNs are constantly asking for proof for just about everything?
« Last Edit: March 14, 2018, 01:14:04 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3392
Re: Oswald Probably Did It
« Reply #67 on: March 13, 2018, 09:48:41 PM »
Why should I?  I asked a question.  But don't play stupid now, it is probably what you meant.  I am 100% certain of that (that you probably meant it).  ::)

 ;)

Offline Wesley Johnson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Oswald Probably Did It
« Reply #68 on: March 14, 2018, 04:07:43 PM »
Sure. My thoughts are laid out in a readable fashion. I do NOT use ONE paragraph for all my thoughts.

If you are going to accuse someone of two murders then you are compelled to provide evidence supporting this contention, but you can't since NONE exists. You're sunk.

No Rob, not sunk at all. I don't have to prove anything. Talk about no evidence. I will ask you again, can you cite any physical, or ballistic evidence that points to anyone other than Oswald or a second shooter? I'll be waiting a long time. After all of these years all you guys have is rebuttal of the evidence that has been known for decades now. So, you have anything?

Offline Wesley Johnson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Oswald Probably Did It
« Reply #69 on: March 14, 2018, 04:10:06 PM »
True enough, but don't you feel like you need good reasons to believe the things you believe?


And what is your reason for never believing anything?

 

Mobile View