Strange, strange find in Moorman Photo...

[Jake Maxwell]

        You've got to hand it to Jack... he really gets around!
     But yes... you have the general idea!

     I do think the corroboration among these three - films and photo - should give
     pause for consideration that someone was behind the fence during Kennedy’s assassination...

These images from three different sources seem to corroborate one another... and suggest a second gunman.... This evidence needs to be examined more closely...

[Richard Smith]

Is there a full moon?  You couldn't see Joseph Stalin riding an elephant in those blurry images.  Anyone who has ever been to Dealey Plaza knows there was no shooter behind that fence.  It appears to give seclusion to a shooter from the Elm St. perspective that is always shown by CTers, but the backside of that fence is open to half of Dallas.  Wide open.   The notion that an assassin would choose that location to stand with his rifle awaiting JFK, shoot him, and then somehow escape is ludicrous. 

[Zeon Mason]

There were lots of cars parked behind that fence which a shooter could have remained hidden  in or blocked by until the last minute.

The shooter might of worn a camouflage hat?

[Richard Smith]

There were lots of cars parked behind that fence which a shooter could have remained hidden  in or blocked by until the last minute.

The shooter might of worn a camouflage hat?

He might also have dressed like the Easter bunny and hopped away to freedom.  Or been teleported by Capt. Kirk to the Starship Enterprise.  Have you ever been to that location?  It is wide open.  You could see a shooter standing there from five miles away.

[Zeon Mason]

Yes, Richard, it’s “open” except when there LOTS of cars lined up in rows which DO allow for cover as there were on Nov 22/63.

There’s the observation by Lee Bowers that he saw 2 men kind of loitering around behind that fence so, it’s so improbable that one of them could have been a gunman.

It’s the “HAT” that’s questionable because Bowers didn’t describe either man wearing at har (as far as I remember).

There also that unidentified man was seen flashing a secret service badge by some witnesses whom the SS cannot account for as they did not have Ann SS agents assigned that area of the GK.

[Zeon Mason]

Sorry, that was some bad typing there and it’s not because I’m drunk, rather it’s because I’m gettin old and this smart phone keyboard is
is TOO $&@ small.

[Steve Barber]

Yes, Richard, it’s “open” except when there LOTS of cars lined up in rows which DO allow for cover as there were on Nov 22/63.

There’s the observation by Lee Bowers that he saw 2 men kind of loitering around behind that fence so, it’s so improbable that one of them could have been a gunman.

It’s the “HAT” that’s questionable because Bowers didn’t describe either man wearing at har (as far as I remember).

There also that unidentified man was seen flashing a secret service badge by some witnesses whom the SS cannot account for as they did not have Ann SS agents assigned that area of the GK.

  Lee Bowers didn't see two men "behind" the fence, looking at it from Elm Street.  Read this:  Mark Lane fooled everyone into believing Bowers saw two men "loitering around" between the fence and himself in the RR tower.  Not true.  Read Bowers entire interview of Bowers, and notice that Lane conveniently left out certain portions of Bowers' interview to falsely present his "case" for conspiracy.  Notice that Bowers says that one of the two men from time to time "walked back and forth and disappeared behind a wooden fence".  Behind in Bowers' sight means these men were on the side of the fence that faces Elm Street! 

 Source (Below): Wisconsin Historical
Society, USMss, 117AN
“Rush to Judgment” Box 60,
Folder 1 Page 4 of 13