Hoover’s effort to “convince the public that Oswald” was lone assassin…

[Jake Maxwell]

These two memos are evidence that top US officials were in collusion to cover-up evidence in the president’s assassination... apprarently discussing their plan only two days after the assassination...

Let’s allow that to sink in...
Top government officials planning to cover-up evidence from the public regarding the president’s assassination... so that one man alone would be their “posthumous” patsy... and then they would seal up most evidence from being examined for decades following...

It is unlikely that Hoover and Katzenbach were planning to cover-up evidence to avert any confrontation with Cuba or Russia... and much, much more likely that they were planning a cover-up to protect themselves... and to protect those Jackie and Robert are said to have believed killed JFK... his “domestic enemies.”

They killed the president... they killed Oswald and framed him “posthumously”... they covered-up the evidence to show Oswald as the lone assassin... most likely to protect themselves from reprisals... and they’ve kept documents classified for decades... far beyond any reasonable time frame that might create an international crisis...

This is the most likely scenario, in my opinion... these two were in on a huge plot to assassinate our president... and the cover-up was only for the sake of self-protection...

[John Iacoletti]

There were legitimate reasons to convince the public of Oswald's guilt.  First, LHO was the assassin.  The evidence is overwhelming.

Once again, “Richard” illustrates how easily overwhelmed he is.

Thank goodness the authorities responsible for the investigation of this matter promptly uncovered and disclosed the truth.

LOL

[Jerry Freeman]

Once again, “Richard” illustrates how easily overwhelmed he is.

We have heard about preaching to the choir.
In that guys case folks...you are preaching to the dead.

[Richard Smith]

There were legitimate reasons to convince the public of Oswald's guilt.

Cool, will you tell us this time?

First, LHO was the assassin.

Any clown can accuse somebody of something, so?

The evidence is overwhelming underwhelming.

Error fixed.

Even after nearly 60 years there is no credible evidence of the involvement of anyone else Oswald.

Error fixed.

Second, given Oswald's bizarre political background, there was a legitimate concern that some nutty conspiracy theory might have prompted WWIII by falsely convincing the public that the Russians or Cubans were behind the assassination.

"Background" -- LOL

Thank goodness the authorities responsible for the investigation of this matter promptly uncovered and disclosed the truth.

Correction: 888 pages of lies and deception.

Remember the Maine!  Bring on WWIII because some commie nut killed the president.  LOL.  Thankfully the United States had responsible leaders at that time to avoid being pressured into war by crazy conspiracy theorists. 

[Martin Weidmann]

Remember the Maine!  Bring on WWIII because some commie nut killed the president.  LOL.  Thankfully the United States had responsible leaders at that time to avoid being pressured into war by crazy conspiracy theorists.

Name the "crazy conspiracy theorists" who were pressuring for war?

And while you're at it, why don't you tell us precisely, how those "responsible leaders" of the US would get the country into WWIII because of the murder of Kennedy, regardless whether a lone nut or a conspiracy was behind it?

[Richard Smith]

Name the "crazy conspiracy theorists" who were pressuring for war?

And while you're at it, why don't you tell us precisely, how those "responsible leaders" of the US would get the country into WWIII because of the murder of Kennedy, regardless whether a lone nut or a conspiracy was behind it?

It seems obvious.  If the public were convinced that the Russians or Cubans were behind the assassination of the US President, that would be deemed an act of war.  Necessitating a military response.  In fact, some CTers alleged the involvement of Russia/Cuba was actually covered up and the blame placed solely on LHO to avoid a war.  Any CTer (such as Mark Lane) who was attempting to convince the public of a fake conspiracy risked causing WWIII. 

[Jerry Freeman]

It seems obvious. If the public were convinced that the Russians or Cubans were behind the assassination of the US President, that would be deemed an act of war.  Necessitating a military response.  In fact, some CTers alleged the involvement of Russia/Cuba was actually covered up and the blame placed solely on LHO to avoid a war.  Any CTer (such as Mark Lane) who was attempting to convince the public of a fake conspiracy risked causing WWIII.

What have you been smoking now?
The topic based on that cornjecture should then be--- 'Hoover's effort to convince the public that Cuba or the Soviets were not involved'
Your spookulations permeates the entire forum.
     
         

It seems obvious.

What is obvious to you is comical to everyone else here with any inkling of skepticism.