Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Are these two photos legit?  (Read 18286 times)

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3701
Re: Are these two photos legit?
« Reply #104 on: February 27, 2022, 04:53:49 PM »
Advertisement
Captain Fritz wore glasses. In a much clearer version of that scene neither detective is wearing glasses. I've believed those two were Sims and Boyd (not sure which is which). BTW, this scene is 5-10 minutes before the SN photos were taken between 13:15-13:20.


Thanks James, this illustrates that Mooney’s idea that Fritz was the first one to pick up the shells could have easily just been a mistaken assumption. Sims wore a hat similar to Fritz’s. And looking from a standing position towards a kneeling detective, it’s a good possibility that (just like Dan) Mooney could have mistaken his identity.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Are these two photos legit?
« Reply #104 on: February 27, 2022, 04:53:49 PM »


Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3091
Re: Are these two photos legit?
« Reply #105 on: February 27, 2022, 05:40:00 PM »
Exactly.  The use of imprecise language by witnesses to recall events from their memory is then subject to the pedantic review of others with 60 years of hindsight seeking to confirm their subjective interpretations of those events.  What, for example, constitutes the "sniper's nest" is not necessary the same for everyone.  It could, for example, encompass the entirety of the 6th floor.

Really Richard?
I've subjected the memory of the eight officers who place the lunch remains where the SN is (3 of them specifically placing the remains on top of the SN), to some kind of "pedantic review".
Well, I challenged Charles to analyse my interpretation of the officers statements so he could clarify where I was going wrong.
Instead of taking up that challenge he just slid away in a cloud of denial, hiding behind the same empty, toothless generalisations you specialise in (re: the post I'm responding to)

So I throw the gauntlet down to you to take on the challenge.
In Reply #98 I present my interpretations of the statements made by eight officers regarding the location of the lunch remains.
Highlight where I've subjected these statements to a "pedantic review" or STFU.

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 955
Re: Are these two photos legit?
« Reply #106 on: February 27, 2022, 05:59:32 PM »
Really Richard?
I've subjected the memory of the eight officers who place the lunch remains where the SN is (3 of them specifically placing the remains on top of the SN), to some kind of "pedantic review".
Well, I challenged Charles to analyse my interpretation of the officers statements so he could clarify where I was going wrong.
Instead of taking up that challenge he just slid away in a cloud of denial, hiding behind the same empty, toothless generalisations you specialise in (re: the post I'm responding to)

So I throw the gauntlet down to you to take on the challenge.
In Reply #98 I present my interpretations of the statements made by eight officers regarding the location of the lunch remains.
Highlight where I've subjected these statements to a "pedantic review" or STFU.

There was more than one spot where chicken bones were located. Alyea suggests the media influenced the officers to have claimed to have seen them.

Montgomery and Shelley's explanation of seeing and having knowledge of multiple people having been eating chicken on the 6th floor that morning explains the two different locations of chicken bones as reported by the detectives and news people.



Mr. BALL. Now, was there some more chicken some place there also?
Mr. MONTGOMERY. Yes--there would be some more chicken over here around where the hulls were found.


Bill Shelley noticed someone eating chicken up on the 6th floot way before the assassination. He thought it was from Givens. Givens denies it but no one ever sees Givens eat his lunch and he doesn't even know where he ate it.

Maybe this is not true.
Mr. BELIN. I want to backtrack a minute before we come to the shots. When did you eat lunch?
Mr. GIVENS. When did I eat lunch? I ate lunch after. Lets see, no; I ate lunch before I went up there, because I stood outside and ate my sandwich standing out there.


Mr. BALL - Now, did you find any chicken bones up there or see any?
Mr. SHELLEY - Yes, I went up later on that day; I believe after we had gotten back from City Hall with someone, I don't remember who it was, one of the officers and they got them.
Mr. BALL - They did what?
Mr. SHELLEY - They got the bones.
Mr. BALL - Where were they?
Mr. SHELLEY - They were on the third--yeah, it would be the third window from the southeast corner.
Mr. BALL - And were they in a sack?
Mr. SHELLEY - Laying on a sack.
Mr. BALL - Laying on a sack?
Mr. SHELLEY - Yes, sir; with a coke bottle sitting in the window.

Mr. BALL - Did you see any other chicken bones anyplace around there?
Mr. SHELLEY - No, sir; that's all.
Mr. BALL - That's the only ones?
Mr. SHELLEY - That's all.
Mr. BALL - Did you see anybody eating fried chicken on that floor that morning?
Mr. SHELLEY - At one time I think I said I did but Charles Givens was the guy that was eating and he was further on over toward the west side and he was eating a sandwich so he says.

Mr. BALL - Now you say that you thought that you had seen someone had eaten fried chicken that morning?
Mr. SHELLEY - I thought I had; those colored boys are always eating chicken.
Mr. BALL - Do you think you did or do you know?
Mr. SHELLEY - I asked Charles Givens whether it was him that was eating and he said it was a sandwich.
Mr. BALL - Was that before you went down for lunch?
Mr. SHELLEY - Yes, sir; it was pretty early in the morning, about 9:30.
Mr. BALL - Where was it?
Mr. SHELLEY - It was two-thirds across the building toward the west because I didn't put plywood over there and he didn't get too far from where we were actually working.

========================

Tom Alyea:
"..... these officers heard the report, that stemmed from WFAA-TV's incorrect announcement that the chicken bones were found on the 6th floor. This officer or officers perhaps used this information to formulate their presence at the scene."


Alyea makes this statement for an entirely different reason, but it explains why Mooney would claim to have seen the chicken bones where he said he did. The thing he fails to see, or mention is the sack or pop bottle. From where he was standing while securing the snipers nest he most likely never seen the bones over by the other set of windows to the West.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Are these two photos legit?
« Reply #106 on: February 27, 2022, 05:59:32 PM »


Offline James Hackerott

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 349
Re: Are these two photos legit?
« Reply #107 on: February 27, 2022, 06:10:28 PM »
Over the last several days I modeled CE510 in 3D to timestamp the image from information provided by faint shadows on the floor. The vertical window pane divider (muntin) of the western window casts a shadow intersecting a deep floor gouge-seen as white in CE510 from reflection of the flash. That deep gouge is still present in Sixth Floor Museum’s sniper’s nest exhibit. I was present last November 22 taking many photos trying time Alyea’s filming of the sniper’s rest boxes. Only by chance, I caught that muntin shadow at the same floor gouge at 13:17. 



Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3701
Re: Are these two photos legit?
« Reply #108 on: February 27, 2022, 07:34:41 PM »
Over the last several days I modeled CE510 in 3D to timestamp the image from information provided by faint shadows on the floor. The vertical window pane divider (muntin) of the western window casts a shadow intersecting a deep floor gouge-seen as white in CE510 from reflection of the flash. That deep gouge is still present in Sixth Floor Museum’s sniper’s nest exhibit. I was present last November 22 taking many photos trying time Alyea’s filming of the sniper’s rest boxes. Only by chance, I caught that muntin shadow at the same floor gouge at 13:17. 




Nice work James! Thanks! This puts the claim by Alyea that the shells were staged 30-minutes later than this squarely where it belongs. In the trash heap along with any credibility one might want to give his ridiculous later day stories.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Are these two photos legit?
« Reply #108 on: February 27, 2022, 07:34:41 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Are these two photos legit?
« Reply #109 on: March 04, 2022, 11:33:37 PM »
The passage you have chosen to highlight Montgomery's uncertainty actually reveals a witness who has answered clearly and who is then harassed into uncertainty. It shows what a farce the questioning was.

 Thumb1:

...and they did this repeatedly.  They did it to Tomlinson.  They did it to Frazier.  They did it to Dougherty.

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3091
Re: Are these two photos legit?
« Reply #110 on: September 19, 2022, 12:02:56 AM »
Bumped regarding the "From the outside looking in..." thread

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Are these two photos legit?
« Reply #110 on: September 19, 2022, 12:02:56 AM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Are these two photos legit?
« Reply #111 on: September 19, 2022, 04:10:48 PM »
I’m sure this has been discussed before...
If these two photos are legit, how are the different “sniper nest" box setups explained?

AND if the president is going by, why would anyone take a picture of these two guys on the fifth floor?
Who took both photos?


Screen-Shot-2022-02-08-at-9-07-19-PM" border="0

Screen-Shot-2022-02-08-at-9-07-19-PM" border="0

The color photo on the left was taken by an James Powell who worked in Army intelligence ( he was possibly affiliated with General Walker)

The official timeline for this photo was about 30 seconds after the photo on the right which was taken by Tom Dillard DURING the shooting.   The official lie is that the box on the sill was moved after Powell's photo and before Dillard's photo...

Those lawyers on LBJ's Special Select Blue Ribbon Committee  weren't so stupid as to actually believe that BS, but they presented it to the gullible pissants ( as LBJ referred to us) 

If one studies the shadows in uncropped copies of these two photo it's obvious that James Powell snapped his photo several minutes before Tom Dillard took his photo.

The reason the window sill box is positioned differently in the photos is because whoever was behind that window when the first photo was taken ( Powell photo) bumped the box after Powell took the photo and there fore it was positioned differently when Dillard took his photo several minutes later.

Screen-Shot-2022-02-08-at-9-07-19-PM" border="0