U.S. And International Politics

[Royell Storing]

My guess is that they know the total registered number of voters and they estimate how many of those will vote based on past experience.  That provides a benchmark figure on the estimated total vote count to be used to determine the percentage of total votes counted.  I don't think the 54% counted necessarily means that 80% of those were mail in votes.  In all likelihood, the votes cast in person at the polls are tabulated much faster meaning they provide a much higher percentage of the initial vote count.   The reason the republicans always get off to a great start is because they get higher margins at the polls, then dems make up ground as the mail in votes are s-l-o-w-l-y counted. 

It doesn't seem like voters at the polls would be statistically any different than voters who mail in their votes but the latter always goes much more heavily dem.   What we need is a national voting holiday that ends early voting and requires everyone to show up at the polls.  That is how elections were conducted for centuries with no issues or delays.  Even before computers.  If they want Americans to have confidence in election results, require people to vote in person and provide ID.  The votes can then be counted within hours.

   There is NO "ESTIMATE" placed alongside the "% Counted" numbers released by the State Of California. The "% Counted" is a Hard Number just like the running Vote Totals for each candidate.
  Calif claims that 80% of VOTES are RECEIVED BY MAIL. This means the total votes for PRATT and HILTON on election night were 80% MAIL IN BALLOTS. Hilton was leading and Pratt running 2nd on Election night with 80% of their vote totals that night being RECEIVED BY MAIL. Now, all the sudden the MAIL IN BALLOTS are seeing them losing better than 2-1? This defies the election day math. And there was OVER 50% counted on Election DAY. This is flat out Election Fraud, and the basic math supports that claim.

[Tom Graves]

There is NO "ESTIMATE" placed alongside the "% Counted" numbers released by the State Of California. The "% Counted" is a Hard Number just like the running Vote Totals for each candidate. Calif claims that 80% of VOTES are RECEIVED BY MAIL. This means the total votes for PRATT and HILTON on election night were 80% MAIL IN BALLOTS. Hilton was leading and Pratt running 2nd on Election night with 80% of their vote totals that night being RECEIVED BY MAIL. Now, all the sudden the MAIL IN BALLOTS are seeing them losing better than 2-1? This defies the election day math. And there was OVER 50% counted on Election DAY. This is flat out Election Fraud, and the basic math supports that claim.

Dear Royell,

Maybe you're just a fascist and you project your character faults onto people who aren't fascists?

-- Tom

[Royell Storing]

Dear Royell,

Maybe you're just a fascist and you project your character faults onto people who aren't fascists?

-- Tom

   The above is Non-Responsive. (1) Calif claims that 80% of ALL BALLOTS CAST are done by mail. You have to KNOW the TOTAL BALLOTS CAST to arrive at a "% Counted" figure. (2) With 80% of the ballots arriving by mail, means that the ballots counted on Elect Day were 80% mail in ballots. And the votes counted on election day showed Hilton winning and Pratt running #2. In no single district statewide, or county inside the city of LA, were Hilton or Pratt losing by anything close to a 2-1 margin. This includes LA County. After election day, the ballots THEN being counted are consistently showing both Hilton and Pratt losing by better than a 2-1 margin. The Mail In ballots  counted on Election Day CLASH with the Mail In ballots being counted after election day. And the "% Counted" on election day was OVER 50% in both the Calif Gov and LA Mayor races. This is a rigged election. The basic math proves it. 

[Lance Payette]

   The above is Non-Responsive. (1) Calif claims that 80% of ALL BALLOTS CAST are done by mail. You have to KNOW the TOTAL BALLOTS CAST to arrive at a "% Counted" figure. (2) With 80% of the ballots arriving by mail, means that the ballots counted on Elect Day were 80% mail in ballots. And the votes counted on election day showed Hilton winning and Pratt running #2. In no single district statewide, or county inside the city of LA, were Hilton or Pratt losing by anything close to a 2-1 margin. This includes LA County. After election day, the ballots THEN being counted are consistently showing both Hilton and Pratt losing by better than a 2-1 margin. The Mail In ballots  counted on Election Day CLASH with the Mail In ballots being counted after election day. And the "% Counted" on election day was OVER 50% in both the Calif Gov and LA Mayor races. This is a rigged election. The basic math proves it.

But Mr. One Glove Bogus Haygood Imposter Getaway Car Huge Gates Guy, did you not read kindly and rational Mr. Payette's post that California explains that your Mysterious One Glove Imposter Percentage is, in fact, merely an estimate based on the number of ballots processed so far vis-a-vis the projected total number of votes cast? Have the Huge Gates of your mind closed on all rationality, has your reading comprehension vanished in the Getaway Car, or what? Kindly and rational Mr. Payette is unable to fathom your confusion.

Easy there, Mr. Bogus One Glove Imposter Haygood Getaway Car Huge Gates Guy. The California voter materials make clear that the percentage you find so suspicious is simply an estimate based on the number of ballots processed so far vis-a-vis the projected total number of votes cast.  When a huge state has 80% mail-in votes and will count ballots that arrive up to a week later, the system is going to appear inefficient and suspicious even when it's not. Chris Cuomo on NewsNation had an excellent segment on this. Despite all the outrcry, the number of mail-in ballots that are actually fraudulent is 0.00006% - roughly 6 in 10,000,000.

[Zeon Mason]

They follow Stalins Marxist creed in California: it does not matter how many voters there are or who they are , whether they are legal citizens or illegal aliens, or dead people or dogs and cats. The only important thing is to make sure that the votes are being counted by Marxist Democrats.

[Royell Storing]

They follow Stalins Marxist creed in California: it does not matter how many voters there are or who they are , whether they are legal citizens or illegal aliens, or dead people or dogs and cats. The only important thing is to make sure that the votes are being counted by Marxist Democrats.

   Yes, you have the Stalin philosophy correct. And Calif reflects this. The only Joe 6 Packs still living inside Calif, are those that can Not afford to relocate. These people are trapped inside a modern day plantation.

[John Corbett]

In Kalifornia, elections aren't decided by the people who cast the votes. They are decided by the people who count the votes.